I don't have that CD anymore - gave it away a number of years ago to a band buddy of mine. My opinion though is that the stereo mixes are original - at least for the album tracks. Only a number of '69 tracks were mixed afresh in the early 90s I believe - mainly some of the singles.Sebastian E wrote:Matthew, what is your opinion regarding the claim that remixes were used for the 60s box set? Can you compare the box set with the (1991?) release of FEIM (masterd by Dick Baxter)?
Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
Moderators: Moderator5, Moderator3, FECC-Moderator, Site Mechanic
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
-
- Posts: 525
- Registered for: 16 years 11 months
- Location: Germany
- Has thanked: 1037 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
I just compared them again and stand by my earlier claim that the mixes are identical.
frus75, thank you for that quote. IMO it does not say that everything beside the Elvis Is Back tracks was remixed for the box set.
frus75, thank you for that quote. IMO it does not say that everything beside the Elvis Is Back tracks was remixed for the box set.
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
To add some confusion to the mix the "Vic" version doesn't sync with the "Budd" version - although both feature that same restored full-fade.Matthew wrote:Mystery Train appears to be the same restored work that appeared on "Elvis at Sun", including the full fade from a lower generation tape mentioned here:
Sebastian Jeansson - elvisrecordings.comThe equally great new Sony transfer of the unprocessed, dynamic Mystery Train makes its debut here on 'Elvis at SUN'. The original, full-ending-to-the last-note version derived from lost Sun Tape Box #1 (that was reported to us by Sven Adamski in 1999) has been recovered from the best available source (tape copy with compression and severe generation loss) and matched with precision during the fade-out, using all the tricks in the book and for once stretching all the 'Elvis at SUN' restoration rules. The result of this impossible task is stunning considering the circumstances.
This would appear to give implication that Kevan Budd's work is certainly still being used - at least at a pre-mastering stage.
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
I think that's a wrong conclusion, if two digital transfers sync up then they are likely sourced from the same analog source (meaning they used the same tape for the analog-to-digital transfer), but certainly not from the same digital source, that doesn't make any sense. What is a digital source transfer anyways?Matthew wrote:This evening I have reviewed tracks 1 to 12 (ie. the original album tracks) from the Legacy Edition against 1999's "Suspicious Minds - The Memphis Anthology". Every single one of them stays in sync. On paper this tells me both releases from the same digital source transfers. Now, disclaimer: it should be noted they are not the same remasters, the Legacy set has better sonics.
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
I think you've misread what I've written. I'm saying that both releases use the same digital transfers. I do not believe tracks 1 to 12 have been re-transferred for the Legacy Edition - simply re-mastered from the 1993 digital transfers.thenexte wrote:I think that's a wrong conclusion, if two digital transfers sync up then they are likely sourced from the same analog source (meaning they used the same tape for the analog-to-digital transfer), but certainly not from the same digital source, that doesn't make any sense. What is a digital source transfer anyways?Matthew wrote:This evening I have reviewed tracks 1 to 12 (ie. the original album tracks) from the Legacy Edition against 1999's "Suspicious Minds - The Memphis Anthology". Every single one of them stays in sync. On paper this tells me both releases from the same digital source transfers. Now, disclaimer: it should be noted they are not the same remasters, the Legacy set has better sonics.
A tape player is mechanical, and needs to be calibrated. No two digital transfers from the same tape will be 100% identical. Sometimes the drift is little, sometimes its wider but it is what it is. A transfer made in 1993 will not sync in the digital realm with a transfer made in 2007, there will be variences.
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
Matthew wrote:I think you've misread what I've written. I'm saying that both releases use the same digital transfers. I do not believe tracks 1 to 12 have been re-transferred for the Legacy Edition - simply re-mastered from the 1993 digital transfers.thenexte wrote:I think that's a wrong conclusion, if two digital transfers sync up then they are likely sourced from the same analog source (meaning they used the same tape for the analog-to-digital transfer), but certainly not from the same digital source, that doesn't make any sense. What is a digital source transfer anyways?Matthew wrote:This evening I have reviewed tracks 1 to 12 (ie. the original album tracks) from the Legacy Edition against 1999's "Suspicious Minds - The Memphis Anthology". Every single one of them stays in sync. On paper this tells me both releases from the same digital source transfers. Now, disclaimer: it should be noted they are not the same remasters, the Legacy set has better sonics.
A tape player is mechanical, and needs to be calibrated. No two digital transfers from the same tape will be 100% identical. Sometimes the drift is little, sometimes its wider but it is what it is. A transfer made in 1993 will not sync in the digital realm with a transfer made in 2007, there will be variences.
http://www.elvisinfonet.com/interview_ernst_from_elvis_in_memphis.html
EIN: Who did the audio remastering on this new ‘From Elvis In Memphis’ and is the quality a real upgrade?
Ernst: Vic Anesini and you tell me if you think it sounds better. I do, but this is not necessarily something that the average consumer will notice.
EIN: Did you find better generation tapes, or a new Studio master?
Ernst: They were the same tapes. But better transfer and mastering. However this is also subjective.
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
I'm afraid the audio evidence - at least on paper - speaks for itself. I've done some digging looking for that IRSC report - my friend, you posted them here!thenexte wrote:Matthew wrote:I think you've misread what I've written. I'm saying that both releases use the same digital transfers. I do not believe tracks 1 to 12 have been re-transferred for the Legacy Edition - simply re-mastered from the 1993 digital transfers.
A tape player is mechanical, and needs to be calibrated. No two digital transfers from the same tape will be 100% identical. Sometimes the drift is little, sometimes its wider but it is what it is. A transfer made in 1993 will not sync in the digital realm with a transfer made in 2007, there will be variences.
http://www.elvisinfonet.com/interview_ernst_from_elvis_in_memphis.htmlEIN: Who did the audio remastering on this new ‘From Elvis In Memphis’ and is the quality a real upgrade?
Ernst: Vic Anesini and you tell me if you think it sounds better. I do, but this is not necessarily something that the average consumer will notice.
EIN: Did you find better generation tapes, or a new Studio master?
Ernst: They were the same tapes. But better transfer and mastering. However this is also subjective.
FULL DETAILS 'From Elvis In Memphis' 40th Anniv - 2 CD Set - page 6thenexte wrote:And here are the ISRC's. Strangely enough, the ISRC's of the original FEIM tracks (Disc 1, Tracks 1-12) are identical to the ISRCs these tracks had on the 60's box set, I can only hope the mastering will be not!
DISC 1:
01 USRC16908256
02 USRC16908257
03 USRC16903936
04 USRC16908258
05 USRC16903937
06 USRC16908259
07 USRC16908260
08 USRC16903938
09 USRC16908261
10 USRC16908262
11 USRC16903635
12 USRC16906016
13 USRC19306035
14 USRC19306033
15 USRC19306040
16 USRC19305712
DISC 2:
01 USRC19306028
02 USRC19306023
03 USRC19306037
04 USRC19306026
05 USRC19306038
06 USRC19306039
07 USRC19306032
08 USRC19306041
09 USRC19306025
10 USRC19306034
11 USRC16906016
12 USRC16903635
13 USRC19901938
14 USRC16901355
15 USRC16908462
16 USRC16908264
17 USRC16908282
18 USRC16903934
19 USRC19901933
20 USRC16908463
Based on my testing it would certainly appear to be the case that those first 12 tracks are old transfers BUT remastered in 2007 - the results are far superior to the 60s box.
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
Haha, no. Although hopefully 1969 tapes were used in the first place! No - the evidence appears to show that tracks 1 through 12 on "From Elvis in Memphis - Legacy Edition" (ie. 2007 restoration project masters used on the Mint set and likely the upcoming Complete Masters set) are in fact remastered from the 1993 (or earlier) digital transfers done for "From Nashville to Memphis - The Essential 60s Masters 1", rather than fresh digital transfers as implied by the various commentaries on this project.Claus wrote:How old? From 1969?
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
Then why don't they have "93" in the number like the Back In Memphis tracks?
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
Honestly? Couldn't say. All I know is that it was noted that the numbers are the same here as for the 60s Box and that based on loading rips of the same songs from each release and analysing them they appear to derive from the same original digital transfers.Claus wrote:Then why don't they have "93" in the number like the Back In Memphis tracks?
-
- Posts: 11660
- Registered for: 21 years 4 months
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
It's rather obvious that the first 12 tracks eg USRC16908256 are referencing the date of recording - 1969 - many years before the advent of digital
When you get to the point where you really understand your computer, it's probably obsolete
-
Topic author - Posts: 2554
- Registered for: 20 years 5 months
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
[This is a continuation of the thread's original post.]
Following is an analysis of songs on the Franklin Mint set that have been -- and have not been -- restored to "perfect" mono, both in the mono and stereo eras.
This analysis allows us to consider patterns in restoration work. It also provides a quick -- but far from 100 percent reliable -- check of masters during the stereo era for which mono masters might have been selected.
These songs are sorted according to their placement on the Complete Masters set.
Songs from the mono era that are in "perfect" mono
Disc 1
_Harbor Lights
_I Love You Because
_That’s All Right
_Blue Moon
_I’ll Never Let You Go
_I Don’t Care If the Sun Don’t Shine
_Just Because
_Good Rockin’ Tonight
_Baby Let’s Play House
_I’m Left, You’re Right, She’s Gone
_I Forgot to Remember to Forget
_Mystery Train
_Trying to Get to You
_I Got a Woman
_Heartbreak Hotel
_Money Honey
_I’m Counting on You
_I Was the One
Disc 2
_Blue Suede Shoes
_My Baby Left Me
_One-Sided Love Affair
_So Glad You’re Mine
_I’m Gonna Sit Right Down and Cry (Over You)
_Tutti Frutti
_Lawdy, Miss Clawdy
_Shake, Rattle and Roll
_I Want You, I Need You, I Love You
_Hound Dog
_Don’t Be Cruel
_Any Way You Want Me (That’s How I Will Be)
_We’re Gonna Move
_Love Me Tender
_Poor Boy
_Let Me
_Love Me
_How Do You Think I Feel
_How’s the World Treating You
_When My Blue Moon Turns to Gold Again
_Long Tall Sally
_Old Shep
_Paralyzed
_Anyplace Is Paradise
_Ready Teddy
_First in Line
_Rip It Up
Disc 3
_(Let Me Be Your) Teddy Bear
_Don’t Leave Me Now
_I Beg of You
_One Night
_Jailhouse Rock
_Young and Beautiful
_I Want to Be Free
_(You’re So Square) Baby I Don’t Care
Disc 4
_Treat Me Nice
_Blue Christmas
_My Wish Came True
_White Christmas
_Here Comes Santa Claus (Right Down Santa Claus Lane)
_Silent Night
_Don’t
_O Little Town of Bethlehem
_Santa Bring My Baby Back (to Me)
_Santa Claus Is Back in Town
_I’ll Be Home for Christmas
_Hard Headed Woman
_Trouble
_New Orleans
_Crawfish
_Dixieland Rock
_Lover Doll, undubbed master (EP version) [also Lover Doll (LP version) on Disc 28]
_Don’t Ask Me Why
_As Long as I Have You
_King Creole
_Young Dreams
_Steadfast, Loyal and True
_Doncha Think It’s Time (single master) [also Doncha Think It’s Time (LP master) on Disc 28]
_Your Cheatin’ Heart
_Wear My Ring Around Your Neck
_I Need Your Love Tonight
_A Big Hunk o’ Love
_Ain’t That Loving You Baby
_(Now and Then There’s) A Fool Such as I
_I Got Stung
Songs from the stereo era that are in “perfect” mono
Disc 7
_Follow That Dream
_What a Wonderful Life
_I’m Not the Marrying Kind
_Sound Advice
Disc 16
_Blue Christmas/One Night [from the 1968 Comeback Special]
_Tiger Man [from the 1968 Comeback Special]
_Medley: Lawdy, Miss Clawdy/Baby, What You Want Me to Do ... [from the 1968 Comeback Special]
Songs from the mono era that are not in "perfect" mono
Disc 1
_Blue Moon of Kentucky
_Milkcow Blues Boogie
_You’re a Heartbreaker
Disc 2
_Playing for Keeps
Disc 3
_I Believe
_Tell Me Why
_Got a Lot o’ Livin’ to Do
_All Shook Up
_Mean Woman Blues
_(There’ll Be) Peace in the Valley (for Me)
_That’s When Your Heartaches Begin
_Take My Hand, Precious Lord
_Party
_Lonesome Cowboy
_Hot Dog
_It Is No Secret (What God Can Do)
_Blueberry Hill
_Have I Told You Lately That I Love You
_Is It So Strange
_True Love
_I Need You So
_Loving You
_When It Rains, It Really Pours
_Don’t Leave Me Now
Songs that are not available on the Franklin Mint set to analyze
Disc 1
_Tomorrow Night
_I’m Left, You’re Right, She’s Gone (slow version)
_When It Rains, It Really Pours (Sun version)
Disc 4
_Danny
_____________________________________
For reference points, here are the songs from the mono era that are not in "perfect" mono that, in my judgment, are the closest and one of the farthest from mono.
Closest: Hot Dog
One of the farthest: (It Is No Secret) What God Can Do.
These clips allow us to listen to just that part of the music that is different between the two channels. The more you hear, the more information there is that is not in mono. Thus, all tracks in the collection that are in "perfect" mono are silent when examined in this way.
Following is an analysis of songs on the Franklin Mint set that have been -- and have not been -- restored to "perfect" mono, both in the mono and stereo eras.
This analysis allows us to consider patterns in restoration work. It also provides a quick -- but far from 100 percent reliable -- check of masters during the stereo era for which mono masters might have been selected.
These songs are sorted according to their placement on the Complete Masters set.
Songs from the mono era that are in "perfect" mono
Disc 1
_Harbor Lights
_I Love You Because
_That’s All Right
_Blue Moon
_I’ll Never Let You Go
_I Don’t Care If the Sun Don’t Shine
_Just Because
_Good Rockin’ Tonight
_Baby Let’s Play House
_I’m Left, You’re Right, She’s Gone
_I Forgot to Remember to Forget
_Mystery Train
_Trying to Get to You
_I Got a Woman
_Heartbreak Hotel
_Money Honey
_I’m Counting on You
_I Was the One
Disc 2
_Blue Suede Shoes
_My Baby Left Me
_One-Sided Love Affair
_So Glad You’re Mine
_I’m Gonna Sit Right Down and Cry (Over You)
_Tutti Frutti
_Lawdy, Miss Clawdy
_Shake, Rattle and Roll
_I Want You, I Need You, I Love You
_Hound Dog
_Don’t Be Cruel
_Any Way You Want Me (That’s How I Will Be)
_We’re Gonna Move
_Love Me Tender
_Poor Boy
_Let Me
_Love Me
_How Do You Think I Feel
_How’s the World Treating You
_When My Blue Moon Turns to Gold Again
_Long Tall Sally
_Old Shep
_Paralyzed
_Anyplace Is Paradise
_Ready Teddy
_First in Line
_Rip It Up
Disc 3
_(Let Me Be Your) Teddy Bear
_Don’t Leave Me Now
_I Beg of You
_One Night
_Jailhouse Rock
_Young and Beautiful
_I Want to Be Free
_(You’re So Square) Baby I Don’t Care
Disc 4
_Treat Me Nice
_Blue Christmas
_My Wish Came True
_White Christmas
_Here Comes Santa Claus (Right Down Santa Claus Lane)
_Silent Night
_Don’t
_O Little Town of Bethlehem
_Santa Bring My Baby Back (to Me)
_Santa Claus Is Back in Town
_I’ll Be Home for Christmas
_Hard Headed Woman
_Trouble
_New Orleans
_Crawfish
_Dixieland Rock
_Lover Doll, undubbed master (EP version) [also Lover Doll (LP version) on Disc 28]
_Don’t Ask Me Why
_As Long as I Have You
_King Creole
_Young Dreams
_Steadfast, Loyal and True
_Doncha Think It’s Time (single master) [also Doncha Think It’s Time (LP master) on Disc 28]
_Your Cheatin’ Heart
_Wear My Ring Around Your Neck
_I Need Your Love Tonight
_A Big Hunk o’ Love
_Ain’t That Loving You Baby
_(Now and Then There’s) A Fool Such as I
_I Got Stung
Songs from the stereo era that are in “perfect” mono
Disc 7
_Follow That Dream
_What a Wonderful Life
_I’m Not the Marrying Kind
_Sound Advice
Disc 16
_Blue Christmas/One Night [from the 1968 Comeback Special]
_Tiger Man [from the 1968 Comeback Special]
_Medley: Lawdy, Miss Clawdy/Baby, What You Want Me to Do ... [from the 1968 Comeback Special]
Songs from the mono era that are not in "perfect" mono
Disc 1
_Blue Moon of Kentucky
_Milkcow Blues Boogie
_You’re a Heartbreaker
Disc 2
_Playing for Keeps
Disc 3
_I Believe
_Tell Me Why
_Got a Lot o’ Livin’ to Do
_All Shook Up
_Mean Woman Blues
_(There’ll Be) Peace in the Valley (for Me)
_That’s When Your Heartaches Begin
_Take My Hand, Precious Lord
_Party
_Lonesome Cowboy
_Hot Dog
_It Is No Secret (What God Can Do)
_Blueberry Hill
_Have I Told You Lately That I Love You
_Is It So Strange
_True Love
_I Need You So
_Loving You
_When It Rains, It Really Pours
_Don’t Leave Me Now
Songs that are not available on the Franklin Mint set to analyze
Disc 1
_Tomorrow Night
_I’m Left, You’re Right, She’s Gone (slow version)
_When It Rains, It Really Pours (Sun version)
Disc 4
_Danny
_____________________________________
For reference points, here are the songs from the mono era that are not in "perfect" mono that, in my judgment, are the closest and one of the farthest from mono.
Closest: Hot Dog
One of the farthest: (It Is No Secret) What God Can Do.
These clips allow us to listen to just that part of the music that is different between the two channels. The more you hear, the more information there is that is not in mono. Thus, all tracks in the collection that are in "perfect" mono are silent when examined in this way.
Last edited by elvissessions on Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:51 am, edited 5 times in total.
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
Most mono cds released in the cd era are not in "perfect" mono. It just that a stereo head was used during the transfer and that the tape was slightly out of alignment. When this happens, some engineers pick the best channel while others leave it as is. Unless the difference is huge between the two channels, it should not matter.
-
Topic author - Posts: 2554
- Registered for: 20 years 5 months
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
This is true.
However, as you can see from the listings, there are some interesting patterns and discrepancies that emerge.
That is what I'm trying to trace.
Your point is also why I included examples of how close it can be to mono and not be mono (Hot Dog) and how "far" the farthest apart are (It Is No Secret and, though not sampled here, Playing for Keeps). I hope what people can hear is that though a mono recording really should be in mono, the amount of out of sync information can range from extremely tiny to just tiny.
I'm too tired now to get into a lot of close examination, but I find it intriguing, for example, which Sun tracks have not been restored in exactly the same fashion. Also, the patches of songs that go one way or the other interest me.
How could this be useful?
Well, to begin with: Test the Budd masters. If there is a track here that is not true mono, and his version is. Then very quickly we're on to something.
How much that "something" matters is up to the individual, but as such things have been the subject of much speculation, this is a starting point.
However, as you can see from the listings, there are some interesting patterns and discrepancies that emerge.
That is what I'm trying to trace.
Your point is also why I included examples of how close it can be to mono and not be mono (Hot Dog) and how "far" the farthest apart are (It Is No Secret and, though not sampled here, Playing for Keeps). I hope what people can hear is that though a mono recording really should be in mono, the amount of out of sync information can range from extremely tiny to just tiny.
I'm too tired now to get into a lot of close examination, but I find it intriguing, for example, which Sun tracks have not been restored in exactly the same fashion. Also, the patches of songs that go one way or the other interest me.
How could this be useful?
Well, to begin with: Test the Budd masters. If there is a track here that is not true mono, and his version is. Then very quickly we're on to something.
How much that "something" matters is up to the individual, but as such things have been the subject of much speculation, this is a starting point.
Last edited by elvissessions on Fri Sep 10, 2010 7:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
Interesting. So what does this tell us? If we are working on the assumption "all tracks have been re-transferred from scratch (where a tape is available)" this would imply one of two things:
1) All mono 1-track tapes (or full-track tapes) have been played back on a stereo tape machine to transfer to digital. Then, in the "true mono" cases the mastering engineer has chosen one side of the transfer to remaster from. Those that display 2-track transfer remnants perhaps show transfers that are fine on both channels. If this is the case its a little frustrating as a mono head should really be used to transfer mono tapes.
2) Some tracks were transferred on a mono head and others on a stereo head. I don't find this likely unless the transfers originate from various time periods, by different engineers doing the work.
1) All mono 1-track tapes (or full-track tapes) have been played back on a stereo tape machine to transfer to digital. Then, in the "true mono" cases the mastering engineer has chosen one side of the transfer to remaster from. Those that display 2-track transfer remnants perhaps show transfers that are fine on both channels. If this is the case its a little frustrating as a mono head should really be used to transfer mono tapes.
2) Some tracks were transferred on a mono head and others on a stereo head. I don't find this likely unless the transfers originate from various time periods, by different engineers doing the work.
-
- Posts: 4343
- Registered for: 15 years 2 months
- Has thanked: 1164 times
- Been thanked: 990 times
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
Anybody seen the Sony produced "Advance Copy" of the Complete Masters set being shown on an unmentionable site ?
Looks good, and should be worth a few Bob should anybody get their hands on a copy !
Looks good, and should be worth a few Bob should anybody get their hands on a copy !
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/SJhDtch/ep.gif)
-
Topic author - Posts: 2554
- Registered for: 20 years 5 months
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
Oh, great ... now i get to try to figure out which unmentionable site that might be.
-
- Posts: 4343
- Registered for: 15 years 2 months
- Has thanked: 1164 times
- Been thanked: 990 times
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
elvissessions wrote:Oh, great ... now i get to try to figure out which unmentionable site that might be.
Think the first one that became unmentionable some years back.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
PS...Who are these "Special Advance Copies" made for and how would you get hold of one ?
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/SJhDtch/ep.gif)
-
- Posts: 11660
- Registered for: 21 years 4 months
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
Thanks for that alert.
Looks interesting
Looks interesting
When you get to the point where you really understand your computer, it's probably obsolete
-
- Posts: 4343
- Registered for: 15 years 2 months
- Has thanked: 1164 times
- Been thanked: 990 times
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
You're welcome, some might argue that the CD's will be better protected in the Advance Copy.
I'm not looking forward to sliding them in and out of the cardboard sleeves on the proper set.
I want one of those advance copies !![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
I'm not looking forward to sliding them in and out of the cardboard sleeves on the proper set.
I want one of those advance copies !
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/SJhDtch/ep.gif)
-
- Posts: 11660
- Registered for: 21 years 4 months
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
With such a pricey set....why they are not using jewel case is unfathomable
When you get to the point where you really understand your computer, it's probably obsolete
-
Topic author - Posts: 2554
- Registered for: 20 years 5 months
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
I wish it were practical to share all of these tracks because there are some interesting things that happen along the way.Interesting. So what does this tell us?
One that I'm thinking about right now is Milkcow Blues, which goes along in perfect mono -- not something that happens just by chance, really -- and then suddenly "slips" out of it. ... Now, what does that mean? A splice between versions? I don't know. Maybe nothing.
I'll try to post a sample of this example later tonight.
It's true a lot of these things don't really alter our lives significantly, but if it helps with the detective work on what's going on with the tracks, it can be fascinating.
-
- Posts: 9240
- Registered for: 21 years 4 months
- Location: España.
- Has thanked: 2360 times
- Been thanked: 4480 times
Re: Complete Masters compared/contrasted with Franklin Mint
Hi there!!
.
. Personally I don´t like the way the cd´s are going to be housed
. Bye for now
.
![Image](http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/4533/masterspromo1.jpg)
![Image](http://img816.imageshack.us/img816/7084/masterspromo2.jpg)
![Image](http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/4940/masterspromo4.jpg)
![Image](http://img835.imageshack.us/img835/3381/masterspromo5.jpg)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Here you are my friendelvissessions wrote:Oh, great ... now i get to try to figure out which unmentionable site that might be.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
![:smt006](./images/smilies/006.gif)
![Image](http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/4533/masterspromo1.jpg)
![Image](http://img816.imageshack.us/img816/7084/masterspromo2.jpg)
![Image](http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/4940/masterspromo4.jpg)
![Image](http://img835.imageshack.us/img835/3381/masterspromo5.jpg)
Maestro. Mike Windgren. Torero!!!!!!!!.
Always Trying To Make Peace <<--->> On FECC
Not The Best, Just The Coolest Guy Around!..
Viva el vino, viva el dinero, viva, viva el amor!!.
![Image](http://bestanimations.com/Flags/Europe/Western/Spain/spain-flag-waving-animated-gif-4.gif)
Always Trying To Make Peace <<--->> On FECC
Not The Best, Just The Coolest Guy Around!..
Viva el vino, viva el dinero, viva, viva el amor!!.
![Image](http://bestanimations.com/Flags/Europe/Western/Spain/spain-flag-waving-animated-gif-4.gif)
-
- Posts: 4343
- Registered for: 15 years 2 months
- Has thanked: 1164 times
- Been thanked: 990 times