"So High"
Moderators: Moderator5, Moderator3, FECC-Moderator, Site Mechanic
-
Topic author
"So High"
Recorded May 27, 1966 at RCA Studio B Nashville, Tenn. Produced By Felton Jarvis with Jim Malloy behind the console.
Another Jubilee "Golden Gate Quartet" type Gospel traditional rouser from the Grammy winning "How Great Thou Art" album. Elvis wanted Jimmy Jones (bass singer of the Harmonizing Four Gospel group) to join the sessions but Tom Diskin couldn't get a hold of him according "A Life In Music" by Ernst Jorgensen. Excellent drumming by Buddy Harman with tambourine by DJ Fontana. Great interaction between Elvis and singers with hand-clapping. Just a beautiful Gospel performance! A great start of side 2 on the album!
.. Earlier version with different title.
.. This is the 45 RPM record Elvis heard and loved, in my opinion. Jimmy Jones and The Sensationals.
..
Another Jubilee "Golden Gate Quartet" type Gospel traditional rouser from the Grammy winning "How Great Thou Art" album. Elvis wanted Jimmy Jones (bass singer of the Harmonizing Four Gospel group) to join the sessions but Tom Diskin couldn't get a hold of him according "A Life In Music" by Ernst Jorgensen. Excellent drumming by Buddy Harman with tambourine by DJ Fontana. Great interaction between Elvis and singers with hand-clapping. Just a beautiful Gospel performance! A great start of side 2 on the album!
.. Earlier version with different title.
.. This is the 45 RPM record Elvis heard and loved, in my opinion. Jimmy Jones and The Sensationals.
..
-
- GodFather of FECC
- Posts: 7517
- Joined: 8 years 5 months
- Location: Playing in the street as the cold wind blows.
- Has thanked: 853 times
- Been thanked: 9975 times
Re: "So High"
Elvis nailed that tune.
This fan has never heard it done better.
This fan has never heard it done better.
The United States of America have had
forty-six Presidents, but only ONE King!
Thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen.
You're a beautiful audience.
-
Topic author
Re: "So High"
Neither has this one!Rob wrote:Elvis nailed that tune.
This fan has never heard it done better.
A very early version.
..
-
- Posts: 108723
- Joined: 21 years 4 months
- Location: United States of America
- Has thanked: 12008 times
- Been thanked: 36117 times
- Age: 89
Re: "So High"
It's a terrific recording, but the 1965 gospel single B-side by Jimmy Jones and The Sensationals is fantastic. Elvis' 1966 master is almost a straight copy, right down to the hand-claps and Jones' bass lead. Let's call it ... a successful homage.Rob wrote:Elvis nailed that tune.
This fan has never heard it done better.
..
Jimmy Jones and the Sensationals "So High" (Savoy 4234, June 1965)
Interesting, that Jones takes a songwriting credit on the tune, given it had been around for years:
On the RCA LP, we see Presley publishers ignored this credit, and treated the song like public domain material. The label reads "Arr. Elvis Presley." Hmm. I don't think Elvis worked on arranging that Savoy single. You gotta love the record business!
Another song from Presley's 1966 gospel sessions that likely was another Jimmy Jones homage was "Somebody Bigger Than You And I," which the singer issued on Savoy back in 1958. Elvis affects the very same bass tone on his lead vocal as heard on "So High."
Jimmy Jones And Chorus "Somebody Bigger Than You And I" (Savoy 1553, October 27, 1958)
At the time, this 1958 single was given a big push in Billboard:
Billboard - October 27, 1958
Jones was also a member of the Harmonizing Four, and his work with the quartet in 1957-1959 would influence at least four Elvis gospel recordings:
"All Things Are Possible" b/w "Farther Along" (Vee-Jay 845, May 1957)
"Where Could I Go But to the Lord" b/w "Motherless Child" (Vee-Jay 854, December 1957)
In any event, for Elvis, the "jubilee" gospel sound remained a lifelong favorite.
BONUS TRACK
Here's another stunning gospel single B-side by the group, with Jones to the fore:
..
Jimmy Jones and the Sensationals "Come On And Go With Me" (Savoy 4116, April 6, 1959)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
.
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!
-
- Posts: 4344
- Joined: 15 years 3 months
- Has thanked: 1165 times
- Been thanked: 992 times
Re: "So High"
You aint heard me sing it !Rob wrote:Elvis nailed that tune.
This fan has never heard it done better.
-
- Posts: 1893
- Joined: 21 years 4 months
- Has thanked: 1202 times
- Been thanked: 729 times
Re: "So High"
Good song!
Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk
Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk
"An artist like Elvis is actually pretending, when he’s home, to be normal. And when he goes out on stage at night is who he actually is." — Bruce Springsteen
-
- GodFather of FECC
- Posts: 7517
- Joined: 8 years 5 months
- Location: Playing in the street as the cold wind blows.
- Has thanked: 853 times
- Been thanked: 9975 times
Re: "So High"
Let's keep it that way if at all possible.Dan_T wrote:You aint heard me sing it !Rob wrote:Elvis nailed that tune.
This fan has never heard it done better.
Last edited by Rob on Fri May 13, 2016 2:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The United States of America have had
forty-six Presidents, but only ONE King!
Thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen.
You're a beautiful audience.
-
Topic author
-
- Posts: 12978
- Joined: 12 years
- Has thanked: 15469 times
- Been thanked: 2831 times
Re: "So High"
You missed it the date with only 25 month (June 1968 from May 1966). Not a big error, after all.
-
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: 8 years 8 months
- Location: CT
- Has thanked: 2349 times
- Been thanked: 975 times
Re: "So High"
I love this song. I love the one on the So High FTD where someone shouts "rolling!" to quiet everyone down before it starts.
The Jimmy Jones version is fantastic; first time I've heard that one.
The Jimmy Jones version is fantastic; first time I've heard that one.
-
- Posts: 108723
- Joined: 21 years 4 months
- Location: United States of America
- Has thanked: 12008 times
- Been thanked: 36117 times
- Age: 89
Re: "So High"
Hard Rocker wrote:A fantastic recording from 1966. The King had had enough. The Comeback was underway.
Oh, what difference does twenty-five months make anyway?jurasic1968 wrote:You missed it the date with only 25 month (June 1968 from May 1966). Not a big error, after all.
.
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!
-
Topic author
Re: "So High"
...or ten years (1954 to 1964) for that matter?drjohncarpenter wrote:Hard Rocker wrote:A fantastic recording from 1966. The King had had enough. The Comeback was underway.Oh, what difference does twenty-five months make anyway?jurasic1968 wrote:You missed it the date with only 25 month (June 1968 from May 1966). Not a big error, after all.
http://www.elvis-collectors.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=92904&start=150
-
- Posts: 4344
- Joined: 15 years 3 months
- Has thanked: 1165 times
- Been thanked: 992 times
Re: "So High"
Rob wrote:Let's keep it that was if at all possible.Dan_T wrote:You aint heard me sing it !Rob wrote:Elvis nailed that tune.
This fan has never heard it done better.
-
Topic author
Re: "So High"
Interesting that Chuck Willis takes a songwriting credit on See See Rider/C C Rider, given it had been around for years!drjohncarpenter wrote:
Interesting, that Jones takes a songwriting credit on the tune, given it had been around for years
And so they should ignore the credit, for it is false. He didn't write it. They treated it like public domain material because it WAS public domain material.On the RCA LP, we see Presley publishers ignored this credit, and treated the song like public domain material. The label reads "Arr. Elvis Presley." Hmm. I don't think Elvis worked on arranging that Savoy single. You gotta love the record business!
And Elvis's arrangement is different to Jones'. Firstly, Elvis's version has an instrumental introduction that Jones's did not have. Secondly the instrumentation is different, with the revival-style piano prominent in Elvis's performance. Thirdly, the tempo is quicker on Elvis's version. Fourthly, the vocal line is different in numerous places. Fifthly, there is the wonderful touch of having the soaring soprano voice as the song comes to a close. Who else would have thought of using a singer for just three or four seconds of music in order to get the sound HE wanted rather than just a "straight copy" of the version that influenced him? Finally, the rhythm used throughout the song uses a different figure to that on the previous recording.It's a terrific recording, but the 1965 gospel single B-side by Jimmy Jones and The Sensationals is fantastic. Elvis' 1966 master is almost a straight copy, right down to the hand-claps and Jones' bass lead. Let's call it ... a successful homage.
Six very good reasons why Elvis's is not "almost a straight copy," and is merely inspired or influenced by the earlier version. The arrangement credit to Elvis was perfectly valid and perfectly apt. It is the subtle things that make a difference in a recording - it's a shame you didn't hear them.
-
Topic author
Re: "So High"
Agree and second all six counts!poormadpeter2 wrote:Interesting that Chuck Willis takes a songwriting credit on See See Rider/C C Rider, given it had been around for years!drjohncarpenter wrote:
Interesting, that Jones takes a songwriting credit on the tune, given it had been around for years
And so they should ignore the credit, for it is false. He didn't write it. They treated it like public domain material because it WAS public domain material.On the RCA LP, we see Presley publishers ignored this credit, and treated the song like public domain material. The label reads "Arr. Elvis Presley." Hmm. I don't think Elvis worked on arranging that Savoy single. You gotta love the record business!
And Elvis's arrangement is different to Jones'. Firstly, Elvis's version has an instrumental introduction that Jones's did not have. Secondly the instrumentation is different, with the revival-style piano prominent in Elvis's performance. Thirdly, the tempo is quicker on Elvis's version. Fourthly, the vocal line is different in numerous places. Fifthly, there is the wonderful touch of having the soaring soprano voice as the song comes to a close. Who else would have thought of using a singer for just three or four seconds of music in order to get the sound HE wanted rather than just a "straight copy" of the version that influenced him? Finally, the rhythm used throughout the song uses a different figure to that on the previous recording.It's a terrific recording, but the 1965 gospel single B-side by Jimmy Jones and The Sensationals is fantastic. Elvis' 1966 master is almost a straight copy, right down to the hand-claps and Jones' bass lead. Let's call it ... a successful homage.
Six very good reasons why Elvis's is not "almost a straight copy," and is merely inspired or influenced by the earlier version. The arrangement credit to Elvis was perfectly valid and perfectly apt. It is the subtle things that make a difference in a recording - it's a shame you didn't hear them.
-
- Posts: 108723
- Joined: 21 years 4 months
- Location: United States of America
- Has thanked: 12008 times
- Been thanked: 36117 times
- Age: 89
Re: "So High"
So glad you again appreciate all the music, research, scans and information I brought to your latest topic.Juan Luis wrote:Agree and second all six counts!
Learning about Elvis is fun.
.
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!
-
Topic author
Re: "So High"
You mean your latest topic. I don't know why you repeated the Jimmy Jones record I had already posted on my OP. Anyway, who are you kidding?drjohncarpenter wrote:So glad you again appreciate all the music, research, scans and information I brought to your latest topic.Juan Luis wrote:Agree and second all six counts!
Learning about Elvis is fun.
-
- Posts: 108723
- Joined: 21 years 4 months
- Location: United States of America
- Has thanked: 12008 times
- Been thanked: 36117 times
- Age: 89
Re: "So High"
A lot of people associated with this forum wonder what has happened to you. Food for thought.Juan Luis wrote:You mean your latest topic. I don't know why you repeated the Jimmy Jones record I had already posted on my OP. Anyway, who are you kidding?drjohncarpenter wrote:So glad you again appreciate all the music, research, scans and information I brought to your latest topic.Juan Luis wrote:Agree and second all six counts!
Learning about Elvis is fun.
.
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!
-
Topic author
Re: "So High"
My intelligence, accusations of falsehoods, integrity, has been questioned by yourself and some of your sycophants (ironic no?). Food for thought indeed.drjohncarpenter wrote:A lot of people associated with this forum wonder what has happened to you. Food for thought.Juan Luis wrote:You mean your latest topic. I don't know why you repeated the Jimmy Jones record I had already posted on my OP. Anyway, who are you kidding?drjohncarpenter wrote:So glad you again appreciate all the music, research, scans and information I brought to your latest topic.Juan Luis wrote:Agree and second all six counts!
Learning about Elvis is fun.
Posting in a thread and expect appreciation when you do not show it yourself? How many threads ago did you state that you posted on my threads in spite of me, or words to that effect? And you use that "hypocrite" word quite a bit. Please...spare me.
-
- Posts: 5848
- Joined: 17 years 4 months
- Location: antarctica
- Has thanked: 499 times
- Been thanked: 3858 times
- Age: 100
Re: "So High"
Another version was recorded on 14-05-59 by LaVern Baker with Chuck Sagle Orchestra (Atlantic 2033).
colonel snow
colonel snow
-
- Posts: 5171
- Joined: 21 years 4 months
- Been thanked: 1377 times
-
- Posts: 7385
- Joined: 21 years 3 months
- Has thanked: 764 times
- Been thanked: 1410 times
-
- Posts: 108723
- Joined: 21 years 4 months
- Location: United States of America
- Has thanked: 12008 times
- Been thanked: 36117 times
- Age: 89
Re: "So High"
Sure, but it also matters that one is a 1965 original by Jimmy Jones and the Sensationals, the other a 1966 homage from Elvis. In retrospect it appears, looking again at the research I did for this topic, that the bass singer was a large influence on the Presley gospel sessions that year and beyond. Even though Jones lost out on royalties when RCA and management treated his Savoy single as if it was public domain material, nothing new for them, credit should always be given when due. So, fifty years later, here it is.Lonely Summer wrote:Elvis' version IS very close to the Jimmy Jones version, doesn't matter to me. They're both great recordings.
.
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!
-
Topic author
Re: "So High"
You can't lose out on royalties for something you didn't write. He didn't write it. It's like me putting out a single of London Bridge is Falling Down and claiming I wrote it. It might gain me some royalties, but it wouldn't be true!drjohncarpenter wrote:Sure, but it also matters that one is a 1965 original by Jimmy Jones and the Sensationals, the other a 1966 homage from Elvis. In retrospect it appears, looking again at the research I did for this topic, that the bass singer was a large influence on the Presley gospel sessions that year and beyond. Even though Jones lost out on royalties when RCA and management treated his Savoy single as if it was public domain material, nothing new for them, credit should always be given when due. So, fifty years later, here it is.Lonely Summer wrote:Elvis' version IS very close to the Jimmy Jones version, doesn't matter to me. They're both great recordings.
-
Topic author
Re: "So High"
Exactly. What Jimmy Jones did was take a public domain song put his spin on it, and then get composer credit. Royalties lost? It is a public domain traditional song. Not an ORIGINAL SONG by any means. If anything, Elvis' credits are honest.poormadpeter2 wrote:You can't lose out on royalties for something you didn't write. He didn't write it. It's like me putting out a single of London Bridge is Falling Down and claiming I wrote it. It might gain me some royalties, but it wouldn't be true!drjohncarpenter wrote:Sure, but it also matters that one is a 1965 original by Jimmy Jones and the Sensationals, the other a 1966 homage from Elvis. In retrospect it appears, looking again at the research I did for this topic, that the bass singer was a large influence on the Presley gospel sessions that year and beyond. Even though Jones lost out on royalties when RCA and management treated his Savoy single as if it was public domain material, nothing new for them, credit should always be given when due. So, fifty years later, here it is.Lonely Summer wrote:Elvis' version IS very close to the Jimmy Jones version, doesn't matter to me. They're both great recordings.