And if Elvis hadn't wanted her to move in, do you think a then 17 yr old girl could have forced him to? Of course not. He wanted her there. I believe he had a rather stupid notion in his head that with her being so young he could mould her into his perfect woman; a woman who would act, talk and even dress exactly how he wanted her to. The problem with that idea is that you can't create a new personality for someone. In time, their sense of individuality will creep through and upset the apple cart. For her part, like the majority of teenage girls on the planet in that period, she was totally blown away by Elvis. Of course she wanted to go and live with him. That hardly makes her some kind of cunning lolita. In fact, it makes her a perfectly normal teenage girl.Graceland Gardener wrote: The story goes Elvis asked/begged/charmed her parents to let her move in.
But was the moving to Memphis his idea? May have been HER idea. Or Parker's?
Equally you could say, look at the sales figures between 1967 and 1972 when they were married. Wow, a huge improvement and the man was back on track. So if your argument says that she was responsible for the downturn, was her influence such that she was responsible for the upturn too? No! Elvis' choices were his own. She had no impact on the films he made or songs he sang, so therefore no impact on his sales figures and chart positions. Besides, she was home in Memphis most of the time during the Hollywood period, so far from being the distraction that you make out. He had all the distractions he needed with a string of affairs with his leading ladies.Graceland Gardener wrote:
Her moving in with Elvis may not be a literal "jinx"![]()
but look at the '63-67 sales figures & chart positions =
she did not help his career. A jinx theory is plausible!
I do think it's feasible that the Colonel could have used the underage point to his advantage. I wouldn't put it past him. That said, she was 17 when she moved into Graceland, not 14, so it's hardly shocking.