MONEY HONEY

Anything about Elvis
More than 100 Million visitors can't be wrong

Moderators: FECC-Moderator, Moderator5, Moderator3, Site Mechanic


User avatar

drjohncarpenter
Posts: 109974
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Location: United States of America
Has thanked: 12389 times
Been thanked: 37835 times
Age: 90

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by drjohncarpenter »

MikeFromHolland wrote:I know you realize ...
You keep trolling with off-topic putdowns of my contributions, I'll keep pointing it out. The comments are unnecessary and unwelcome.

The ball is in your court.


.
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!


Hard Rocker

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by Hard Rocker »

A fantastic thread yet again, Mike. Clearly this piece took a lot of time and energy to put together and I thank you for your effort.




Chucky99
Posts: 990
Registered for: 9 years 11 months
Location: Romania
Has thanked: 138 times
Been thanked: 533 times
Age: 43

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by Chucky99 »

This song is just perfect...



User avatar

Topic author
MikeFromHolland
Posts: 7583
Registered for: 12 years 9 months
Has thanked: 2477 times
Been thanked: 6862 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by MikeFromHolland »

drjohncarpenter wrote:
I keep trolling with off-topic putdowns of anyones contributions, and you keep pointing it out to me. That's irritating. I like yes-men surrounding me much much more. My comments are unnecessary and unwelcome, I know, but when you point that out to me, I don't reconsider or appologise, I will just hit the "keep on trolling" button. Unfortunately you can't avoid my posts because I post on each and every thread on this board. I'm everywhere. Some of my followers say some are stalking me around on this board, but it's not true we all know that. You'll just find my (mostly unnecessary) posts everywhere. I will stay the Albert Goldman on this board. So I will keep on hammering that the movie years were no good, that the later years were no good, that Elvis himself most of the time was no good, except for nine years out of the 24, and that I know best. That's why I call myself a Doc. Which I'm clearly not.
Fixed. The ball is in your court, quack.

.


Mike

------
lay back,
take it easy
And try a smile...

.


Scarre
Posts: 5177
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Been thanked: 1378 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by Scarre »

jetblack wrote:
drjohncarpenter wrote:
TheKingisthething wrote:
jeanno wrote:Another 1956 classic. Elvis was at the top of his game as he recorded a classic over an already timeless recording.
It was also the perfect way to close that first album.

The 1956 TV performance oozes awesomeness too.
from 1954 to August 1956 he was at his greatest and most consistent in the studio... From the Seotember 1956 more dud recordings were made and released... among these: the Love Me Tender soundtrack, and some of the selections recorded for his second lp ...
Most of the 20th Century Fox "Love Me Tender" soundtrack is so-so, but Elvis' delivers everything with energy and style, so "dud" seems harsh. They are still better than what came out ten years later. Even the soundtrack work in 1957 and 1958 for Paramount and MGM had a handful of just OK tunes, but Presley is on fire with each master, so they remain listenable. This would not be the case later on.
Please define these handful of OK tunes from 'Loving You', 'Jailhouse Rock' and 'King Creole'.

Andy
:D



User avatar

Topic author
MikeFromHolland
Posts: 7583
Registered for: 12 years 9 months
Has thanked: 2477 times
Been thanked: 6862 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by MikeFromHolland »

Hard Rocker wrote:A fantastic thread yet again, Mike. Clearly this piece took a lot of time and energy to put together and I thank you for your effort.
Thank you, sir!

.


Mike

------
lay back,
take it easy
And try a smile...

.


Scarre
Posts: 5177
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Been thanked: 1378 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by Scarre »

Great song. One of the best from the 50`s. Well, the are quite alot of those "best from the 50`s"...




Davelee
Banned -- Same user as "mysterytrainrideson"
Banned -- Same user as "mysterytrainrideson"
Posts: 3027
Registered for: 9 years 8 months
Has thanked: 887 times
Been thanked: 622 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by Davelee »

MikeFromHolland wrote:
drjohncarpenter wrote:
I keep trolling with off-topic putdowns of anyones contributions, and you keep pointing it out to me. That's irritating. I like yes-men surrounding me much much more. My comments are unnecessary and unwelcome, I know, but when you point that out to me, I don't reconsider or appologise, I will just hit the "keep on trolling" button. Unfortunately you can't avoid my posts because I post on each and every thread on this board. I'm everywhere. Some of my followers say some are stalking me around on this board, but it's not true we all know that. You'll just find my (mostly unnecessary) posts everywhere. I will stay the Albert Goldman on this board. So I will keep on hammering that the movie years were no good, that the later years were no good, that Elvis himself most of the time was no good, except for nine years out of the 24, and that I know best. That's why I call myself a Doc. Which I'm clearly not.
Fixed. The ball is in your court, quack.

.
You ought to stop being stupid and childish Mike, you're getting very irritating and annoying to read you re childish posts.

You've got a good thing going on this forum with your own section, you don't want to spoil it over idiotic behaviour.



User avatar

jetblack
Posts: 4989
Registered for: 20 years 5 months
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, England
Has thanked: 6859 times
Been thanked: 6056 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by jetblack »

jetblack wrote:
drjohncarpenter wrote:
TheKingisthething wrote:
jeanno wrote:Another 1956 classic. Elvis was at the top of his game as he recorded a classic over an already timeless recording.
It was also the perfect way to close that first album.

The 1956 TV performance oozes awesomeness too.
from 1954 to August 1956 he was at his greatest and most consistent in the studio... From the Seotember 1956 more dud recordings were made and released... among these: the Love Me Tender soundtrack, and some of the selections recorded for his second lp ...
Most of the 20th Century Fox "Love Me Tender" soundtrack is so-so, but Elvis' delivers everything with energy and style, so "dud" seems harsh. They are still better than what came out ten years later. Even the soundtrack work in 1957 and 1958 for Paramount and MGM had a handful of just OK tunes, but Presley is on fire with each master, so they remain listenable. This would not be the case later on.
Please define these handful of OK tunes from 'Loving You', 'Jailhouse Rock' and 'King Creole'.

Andy

I thought so. Brushed aside like a true politician.

Andy


Elvis - King of the UK charts

User avatar

drjohncarpenter
Posts: 109974
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Location: United States of America
Has thanked: 12389 times
Been thanked: 37835 times
Age: 90

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by drjohncarpenter »

MikeFromHolland wrote:Fixed. The ball is in your court, quack.
Davelee wrote:You ought to stop being stupid and childish Mike, you're getting very irritating and annoying to read you re childish posts.

You've got a good thing going on this forum with your own section, you don't want to spoil it over idiotic behaviour.
Now he's name-calling. That's about right for a ten year-old.


jetblack wrote:I thought so. Brushed aside like a true politician.
You've proven many times you're not interested in my opinion, except to launch another series of put-downs. Good luck with that. :smt023


.
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!


ICanHelp
Posts: 1506
Registered for: 10 years 9 months
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 808 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by ICanHelp »

drjohncarpenter wrote:
MikeFromHolland wrote:Fixed. The ball is in your court, quack.
Davelee wrote:You ought to stop being stupid and childish Mike, you're getting very irritating and annoying to read you re childish posts.

You've got a good thing going on this forum with your own section, you don't want to spoil it over idiotic behaviour.
Now he's name-calling. That's about right for a ten year-old.

Unlike, of course, "stupid," childish" and "idiotic." Sheesh.




Hard Rocker

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by Hard Rocker »

drjohncarpenter wrote:
MikeFromHolland wrote:Fixed. The ball is in your court, quack.
Davelee wrote:You ought to stop being stupid and childish Mike, you're getting very irritating and annoying to read you re childish posts.

You've got a good thing going on this forum with your own section, you don't want to spoil it over idiotic behaviour.
Now he's name-calling. That's about right for a ten year-old.


jetblack wrote:I thought so. Brushed aside like a true politician.
You've proven many times you're not interested in my opinion, except to launch another series of put-downs. Good luck with that. :smt023
When it comes to name-calling and put-downs, a very close look in the mirror is required in your case. Never a day goes past when you're not on here squabbling with someone.

Mike started a fascinating topic here and actually thanked you for your initial contribution. It reflects extremely poorly upon you that you were unable to accept that generous gesture of goodwill and reciprocate in kind.



User avatar

Topic author
MikeFromHolland
Posts: 7583
Registered for: 12 years 9 months
Has thanked: 2477 times
Been thanked: 6862 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by MikeFromHolland »

Hard Rocker wrote:
drjohncarpenter wrote:

Now he's name-calling. That's about right for a ten year-old.

When it comes to name-calling and put-downs, a very close look in the mirror is required in your case. Never a day goes past when you're not on here squabbling with someone.
You both are right imo.

Hard Rocker because drjohncarpenter can indeed use a look in the mirror when it comes to name-calling and put-downs.

And drjohncarpenter because name-calling is about right for a ten year-old.


To clarify: I wasn't name-calling. I was sharing a well informed and accurate characterization of the person in question.
TOP DEFINITION
quack
A doctor of questionable ablitiy and reputation.
Source: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=quack

.


Mike

------
lay back,
take it easy
And try a smile...

.

User avatar

drjohncarpenter
Posts: 109974
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Location: United States of America
Has thanked: 12389 times
Been thanked: 37835 times
Age: 90

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by drjohncarpenter »

It's amazing, you even troll your OWN topics. Carry on ...


.
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!

User avatar

TheKingisthething
Posts: 535
Registered for: 10 years 9 months
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by TheKingisthething »

Hard Rocker wrote:A fantastic thread yet again, Mike. Clearly this piece took a lot of time and energy to put together and I thank you for your effort.

Indeed great!!! Tnx




Hard Rocker

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by Hard Rocker »

drjohncarpenter wrote:It's amazing, you even troll your OWN topics. Carry on ...
The only person doing any trolling here is you. Slide on.




Davelee
Banned -- Same user as "mysterytrainrideson"
Banned -- Same user as "mysterytrainrideson"
Posts: 3027
Registered for: 9 years 8 months
Has thanked: 887 times
Been thanked: 622 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by Davelee »

MikeFromHolland wrote:
Hard Rocker wrote:
drjohncarpenter wrote:

Now he's name-calling. That's about right for a ten year-old.

When it comes to name-calling and put-downs, a very close look in the mirror is required in your case. Never a day goes past when you're not on here squabbling with someone.
You both are right imo.

Hard Rocker because drjohncarpenter can indeed use a look in the mirror when it comes to name-calling and put-downs.

And drjohncarpenter because name-calling is about right for a ten year-old.


To clarify: I wasn't name-calling. I was sharing a well informed and accurate characterization of the person in question.
TOP DEFINITION
quack
A doctor of questionable ablitiy and reputation.
Source: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=quack

.
The Doc made a comment about the mediocre songs on the "Love Me Tender" soundtrack and that they were still
performed well purely because Elvis was at his best, but he said the same couldn't be said for Presley 10 yrs later because by that time Elvis had lost a lot of interest in recording so much mediocre work and the boredom can be clearly heard on the recordings, plus, the film's showed Elvis virtually sleepwalking through them - the evidence is all there to see and hear. Then you MikeFromHollabd came along and said that what the Doc said was totally unnecessary and accusing him of hammering on and being raison d' etre.

So, could you please tell us what was so unnecessary about the Doc's post? considering what he said is true




minkahed
Posts: 8958
Registered for: 21 years 8 months
Location: Roanoke, Virginia
Has thanked: 5467 times
Been thanked: 1934 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by minkahed »

Don't even insult ten year olds with these quack behavioral issues.


Image

I don't care what Ed Van Halen says about me--all's I know is that Howard Stern and Mr. Rogers like me just the way I friendly am! - David Lee Roth

User avatar

Topic author
MikeFromHolland
Posts: 7583
Registered for: 12 years 9 months
Has thanked: 2477 times
Been thanked: 6862 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by MikeFromHolland »

Davelee wrote:
MikeFromHolland wrote:
Hard Rocker wrote:
drjohncarpenter wrote:

Now he's name-calling. That's about right for a ten year-old.

When it comes to name-calling and put-downs, a very close look in the mirror is required in your case. Never a day goes past when you're not on here squabbling with someone.
You both are right imo.

Hard Rocker because drjohncarpenter can indeed use a look in the mirror when it comes to name-calling and put-downs.

And drjohncarpenter because name-calling is about right for a ten year-old.


To clarify: I wasn't name-calling. I was sharing a well informed and accurate characterization of the person in question.
TOP DEFINITION
quack
A doctor of questionable ablitiy and reputation.
Source: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=quack

.
The Doc made a comment about the mediocre songs on the "Love Me Tender" soundtrack and that they were still
performed well purely because Elvis was at his best, but he said the same couldn't be said for Presley 10 yrs later because by that time Elvis had lost a lot of interest in recording so much mediocre work and the boredom can be clearly heard on the recordings, plus, the film's showed Elvis virtually sleepwalking through them - the evidence is all there to see and hear. Then you MikeFromHollabd came along and said that what the Doc said was totally unnecessary and accusing him of hammering on and being raison d' etre.

So, could you please tell us what was so unnecessary about the Doc's post? considering what he said is true
First: learn some French. Second: read about systems thinking. Third: deepen yourself in the meaning of highlighted text (bold text f.i.). Fourth: don't meddle and do stay on topic please. Thank you.

.


Mike

------
lay back,
take it easy
And try a smile...

.


Davelee
Banned -- Same user as "mysterytrainrideson"
Banned -- Same user as "mysterytrainrideson"
Posts: 3027
Registered for: 9 years 8 months
Has thanked: 887 times
Been thanked: 622 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by Davelee »

MikeFromHolland wrote:
Davelee wrote:
MikeFromHolland wrote:
Hard Rocker wrote:
drjohncarpenter wrote:

Now he's name-calling. That's about right for a ten year-old.

When it comes to name-calling and put-downs, a very close look in the mirror is required in your case. Never a day goes past when you're not on here squabbling with someone.
You both are right imo.

Hard Rocker because drjohncarpenter can indeed use a look in the mirror when it comes to name-calling and put-downs.

And drjohncarpenter because name-calling is about right for a ten year-old.


To clarify: I wasn't name-calling. I was sharing a well informed and accurate characterization of the person in question.
TOP DEFINITION
quack
A doctor of questionable ablitiy and reputation.
Source: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=quack

.
The Doc made a comment about the mediocre songs on the "Love Me Tender" soundtrack and that they were still
performed well purely because Elvis was at his best, but he said the same couldn't be said for Presley 10 yrs later because by that time Elvis had lost a lot of interest in recording so much mediocre work and the boredom can be clearly heard on the recordings, plus, the film's showed Elvis virtually sleepwalking through them - the evidence is all there to see and hear. Then you MikeFromHollabd came along and said that what the Doc said was totally unnecessary and accusing him of hammering on and being raison d' etre.

So, could you please tell us what was so unnecessary about the Doc's post? considering what he said is true
First: learn some French. Second: read about systems thinking. Third: deepen yourself in the meaning of highlighted text (bold text f.i.). Fourth: don't meddle and do stay on topic please. Thank you.

.
You started the off-topic comment so you face the consequences. So please stay on-topic in the future instead of making derogatory comments on other people's information. Thank you.



User avatar

Topic author
MikeFromHolland
Posts: 7583
Registered for: 12 years 9 months
Has thanked: 2477 times
Been thanked: 6862 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by MikeFromHolland »

.

Again: don't meddle and do some homework. Thank you.

.


Mike

------
lay back,
take it easy
And try a smile...

.


Davelee
Banned -- Same user as "mysterytrainrideson"
Banned -- Same user as "mysterytrainrideson"
Posts: 3027
Registered for: 9 years 8 months
Has thanked: 887 times
Been thanked: 622 times

Re: MONEY HONEY

Post by Davelee »

MikeFromHolland wrote:.

Again: don't meddle and do some homework. Thank you.

.
Done my homework - do yours. :smt023