GLAISTER wrote:'Kismet' is pleasant enough, but the world is not a better place because Elvis recorded it.
Unlike 'Hound Dog'.
Totally agree
.
Moderators: FECC-Moderator, Moderator5, Moderator3, Site Mechanic
GLAISTER wrote:'Kismet' is pleasant enough, but the world is not a better place because Elvis recorded it.
Unlike 'Hound Dog'.
Just like Elvis!Josee wrote: I've always had a preference for ballads.
Yes!Josee wrote:I like "Kismet", too. Especially the way he sings "we've met". It's on my Elvis favourite ballads list. I became a fan in 1958 after seeing "Jailhouse Rock", but being a female, I've always had a preference for ballads.
jurasic1968 wrote:OK, what's your opinion about the LP Harum Scarum? How do you place it in the legacy of Elvis Presley?
Don't feed the troll JL, not worth it.Juan Luis wrote:You like to put thoughts words in my mouth. It is all in the title. Any love? And I go further if you feel the "need"... Where do I state that this is top shelf song. Just highlighting a little nugget I like. And obviously what irks you and the others is that I am not alone on this. And there is NOTHING you can do about it.fn2drive wrote:You have almost a fetish in higlighting the most appalling recordings and labeling them underrated. This soundtrack is utter garbage and the nadir of Elvis soundtrack recordings. We get it-Elvis cut it so it is fantastic. I'm sure you must deep down believe that Elvis version of Old MacDonald brings something to the table-that ending mulligan stew how cool is that? As i noted in your thread of the pedestrian Girls Girls Girls title track, no one objects to you loving the most mediocre and poorest recordings of Elvis career. There are many i love. I just never pretend these are legacy recordings-they arent.
Ha! Was Elvis the William Shatner of Rock n Roll, or was William Shatner the Elvis of intergalactic space adventure?!GERRY wrote:Love it, love this soundtrack. Another thumbs up. Oh btw love reading these topics.
Footnote Elvis Star Trek sideburns and Star Trek was popular then:- coincidence? I place a bet that Elvis loved star trek.
He is not trolling, just pointing out the errors in JLs post. Obviously you can't tell the difference between trolling and someone saying facts.TINML wrote:Don't feed the troll JL, not worth it.Juan Luis wrote:You like to put thoughts words in my mouth. It is all in the title. Any love? And I go further if you feel the "need"... Where do I state that this is top shelf song. Just highlighting a little nugget I like. And obviously what irks you and the others is that I am not alone on this. And there is NOTHING you can do about it.fn2drive wrote:You have almost a fetish in higlighting the most appalling recordings and labeling them underrated. This soundtrack is utter garbage and the nadir of Elvis soundtrack recordings. We get it-Elvis cut it so it is fantastic. I'm sure you must deep down believe that Elvis version of Old MacDonald brings something to the table-that ending mulligan stew how cool is that? As i noted in your thread of the pedestrian Girls Girls Girls title track, no one objects to you loving the most mediocre and poorest recordings of Elvis career. There are many i love. I just never pretend these are legacy recordings-they arent.
Indeed. It's not exactly in the same bracket as "Loving You", "Elvis Is Back" or "From Elvis In Memphis". The way some people on this thread react you'd think that they think "Harum Scarum" is the greatest LP ever...jurasic1968 wrote:I'm not his yes man, like you sad very "polite". It's just a fact that this LP was one of the worst Elvis Presley ever recorded.
Ugh another brown-noser, what is this roll call?Davelee wrote:He is not trolling, just pointing out the errors in JLs post. Obviously you can't tell the difference between trolling and someone saying facts.TINML wrote:Don't feed the troll JL, not worth it.Juan Luis wrote:You like to put thoughts words in my mouth. It is all in the title. Any love? And I go further if you feel the "need"... Where do I state that this is top shelf song. Just highlighting a little nugget I like. And obviously what irks you and the others is that I am not alone on this. And there is NOTHING you can do about it.fn2drive wrote:You have almost a fetish in higlighting the most appalling recordings and labeling them underrated. This soundtrack is utter garbage and the nadir of Elvis soundtrack recordings. We get it-Elvis cut it so it is fantastic. I'm sure you must deep down believe that Elvis version of Old MacDonald brings something to the table-that ending mulligan stew how cool is that? As i noted in your thread of the pedestrian Girls Girls Girls title track, no one objects to you loving the most mediocre and poorest recordings of Elvis career. There are many i love. I just never pretend these are legacy recordings-they arent.
Wow!! That's a clever answer This should be the all time top ten original post. Well done...TINML wrote:Ugh another brown-noser, what is this roll call?Davelee wrote:He is not trolling, just pointing out the errors in JLs post. Obviously you can't tell the difference between trolling and someone saying facts.TINML wrote:Don't feed the troll JL, not worth it.Juan Luis wrote:You like to put thoughts words in my mouth. It is all in the title. Any love? And I go further if you feel the "need"... Where do I state that this is top shelf song. Just highlighting a little nugget I like. And obviously what irks you and the others is that I am not alone on this. And there is NOTHING you can do about it.fn2drive wrote:You have almost a fetish in higlighting the most appalling recordings and labeling them underrated. This soundtrack is utter garbage and the nadir of Elvis soundtrack recordings. We get it-Elvis cut it so it is fantastic. I'm sure you must deep down believe that Elvis version of Old MacDonald brings something to the table-that ending mulligan stew how cool is that? As i noted in your thread of the pedestrian Girls Girls Girls title track, no one objects to you loving the most mediocre and poorest recordings of Elvis career. There are many i love. I just never pretend these are legacy recordings-they arent.
Well at least it WAS clever, compared to what you do on this forum, you know parroting whatever HE says.Davelee wrote:Wow!! That's a clever answer This should be the all time top ten original post. Well done...TINML wrote:Ugh another brown-noser, what is this roll call?Davelee wrote:He is not trolling, just pointing out the errors in JLs post. Obviously you can't tell the difference between trolling and someone saying facts.TINML wrote:Don't feed the troll JL, not worth it.Juan Luis wrote:You like to put thoughts words in my mouth. It is all in the title. Any love? And I go further if you feel the "need"... Where do I state that this is top shelf song. Just highlighting a little nugget I like. And obviously what irks you and the others is that I am not alone on this. And there is NOTHING you can do about it.fn2drive wrote:You have almost a fetish in higlighting the most appalling recordings and labeling them underrated. This soundtrack is utter garbage and the nadir of Elvis soundtrack recordings. We get it-Elvis cut it so it is fantastic. I'm sure you must deep down believe that Elvis version of Old MacDonald brings something to the table-that ending mulligan stew how cool is that? As i noted in your thread of the pedestrian Girls Girls Girls title track, no one objects to you loving the most mediocre and poorest recordings of Elvis career. There are many i love. I just never pretend these are legacy recordings-they arent.
The trolls are the little tentacles of the big octopus! And enjoying every moment the thread is crapped. That won't stop me!TINML wrote:Well at least it WAS clever, compared to what you do on this forum, you know parroting whatever HE says.Davelee wrote:Wow!! That's a clever answer This should be the all time top ten original post. Well done...TINML wrote:Ugh another brown-noser, what is this roll call?Davelee wrote:He is not trolling, just pointing out the errors in JLs post. Obviously you can't tell the difference between trolling and someone saying facts.TINML wrote:Don't feed the troll JL, not worth it.Juan Luis wrote:You like to put thoughts words in my mouth. It is all in the title. Any love? And I go further if you feel the "need"... Where do I state that this is top shelf song. Just highlighting a little nugget I like. And obviously what irks you and the others is that I am not alone on this. And there is NOTHING you can do about it.fn2drive wrote:You have almost a fetish in higlighting the most appalling recordings and labeling them underrated. This soundtrack is utter garbage and the nadir of Elvis soundtrack recordings. We get it-Elvis cut it so it is fantastic. I'm sure you must deep down believe that Elvis version of Old MacDonald brings something to the table-that ending mulligan stew how cool is that? As i noted in your thread of the pedestrian Girls Girls Girls title track, no one objects to you loving the most mediocre and poorest recordings of Elvis career. There are many i love. I just never pretend these are legacy recordings-they arent.
I love posting them. And will continue...GERRY wrote:Love it, love this soundtrack. Another thumbs up. Oh btw love reading these topics.
Juan Luis wrote:I love posting them. And will continue...GERRY wrote:Love it, love this soundtrack. Another thumbs up. Oh btw love reading these topics.
Thank you.MikeFromHolland wrote:Juan Luis wrote:I love posting them. And will continue...GERRY wrote:Love it, love this soundtrack. Another thumbs up. Oh btw love reading these topics.
YES!!!
.
Yes but it did make the top 10 unlike From Elvis In Memphis which only went to number 13, so therefore,,,(just thought I'd beat someone to it)Davelee wrote:Indeed. It's not exactly in the same bracket as "Loving You", "Elvis Is Back" or "From Elvis In Memphis". The way some people on this thread react you'd think that they think "Harum Scarum" is the greatest LP ever...jurasic1968 wrote:I'm not his yes man, like you sad very "polite". It's just a fact that this LP was one of the worst Elvis Presley ever recorded.
ANOTHER classic untrue rude remark.... it never ends with people who have no intelligence to say something positive, other then to put people down who give an honest opinion. Just for the record: i'm no Yes man to anyone on this forum, I say what I believe in, despite what you and others think, though I do agree with a lot of what the Doc says but that doesn't make me a "Yes man". Though to be fair I could accuse you, Juan, Hard Rocker, Mikefromholland the same thing, yes men, considering you lot are always liking each other's posts.TINML wrote:Well at least it WAS clever, compared to what you do on this forum, you know parroting whatever HE says.Davelee wrote:Wow!! That's a clever answer This should be the all time top ten original post. Well done...TINML wrote:Ugh another brown-noser, what is this roll call?Davelee wrote:He is not trolling, just pointing out the errors in JLs post. Obviously you can't tell the difference between trolling and someone saying facts.TINML wrote:Don't feed the troll JL, not worth it.Juan Luis wrote:You like to put thoughts words in my mouth. It is all in the title. Any love? And I go further if you feel the "need"... Where do I state that this is top shelf song. Just highlighting a little nugget I like. And obviously what irks you and the others is that I am not alone on this. And there is NOTHING you can do about it.fn2drive wrote:You have almost a fetish in higlighting the most appalling recordings and labeling them underrated. This soundtrack is utter garbage and the nadir of Elvis soundtrack recordings. We get it-Elvis cut it so it is fantastic. I'm sure you must deep down believe that Elvis version of Old MacDonald brings something to the table-that ending mulligan stew how cool is that? As i noted in your thread of the pedestrian Girls Girls Girls title track, no one objects to you loving the most mediocre and poorest recordings of Elvis career. There are many i love. I just never pretend these are legacy recordings-they arent.