A question about "Crawfish"

Anything about Elvis
More than 100 Million visitors can't be wrong

Moderators: FECC-Moderator, Moderator5, Moderator3, Site Mechanic


User avatar

Topic author
JimmyCool
Posts: 5817
Registered for: 17 years 1 month
Location: Viña del Mar, Chile
Mood:
Has thanked: 1020 times
Been thanked: 2259 times

A question about "Crawfish"

Post by JimmyCool »

I was listening to the version of "Crawfish" on the new FTD Book+CD of "King Creole" and I noticed that Kitty White's vocals are very low in the mix (and with a lot of echo too.)
I'm more familiar with the version on "The Complete '50s Masters," where her voice is way more upfront an with much less echo (if any.)
Now, I guess the FTD version is probably the original mix, but I'm not sure, since I got rid of my early "King Creole" CD (from 1988 I think it was) as soon as I got the '50s box in the late '90s.

Anyway, back to the question...
Listening to the FTD CD something caught my attention: We all know these sessions were recorded in binaural (second channel used for orchestra and overdubs or whatever) but, as far as I know, the only sources availables now are the mono masters (plus a few outtakes of some songs, "Crawfish" NOT included) and the acetate of the unedited master, then... how did they do different mixes of Kitty White's vocals with what's left? It's imposible having just mono masters... :-?

Image
Kitty White

AURAL EVIDENCE HERE:
http://www.elvis-collectors.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=55630&p=808317#p808317
Last edited by JimmyCool on Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.


Note: This post is intended solely for FECC forum readers. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this post is strictly prohibited.

User avatar

luckyjackson1
Posts: 9176
Registered for: 14 years 7 months
Location: Germany, pretty close to Bad Nauheim
Has thanked: 1855 times
Been thanked: 1183 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by luckyjackson1 »

Could it be they have both mono-tapes, the one with the original mix (Kitty White low in the mix with echo) AND the "dry" version?

IIRC they found tapes for the acetates they used on "Essential Elvis Volume 3 - Hits Like Never Before" in 1990?

That would explain the use of the "dry" version on the 50s Box set...

Pure speculation though!

I think you know this one, Jimmy, but let me post it here:

"The movie version contains extra vocals by Kitty White in the 2nd verse, that are not on the Unedited Master (as pressed on acetate) or the Record Version.
As these sessions were recorded in Binaural (2nd channel used for Orchestra, Overdubs etc.), it's possible that Kitty White's vocals were left out of the original unedited take AND Record Version, but kept in for the movie version. They're basically different mixes."


When the evening shadows fall
And you're wondering who to call
For a little company
There's always me


TONY
Posts: 5662
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Location: MIDDLESEX
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by TONY »

Also, the complete version was not included on the recent FTD. A bad oversight.




ritchie valens
Banned for Political Trolling
Banned for Political Trolling
Posts: 3520
Registered for: 19 years 10 months
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 53 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by ritchie valens »

wasnt the unedited master found on a reel?




TONY
Posts: 5662
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Location: MIDDLESEX
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by TONY »

ritchie valens wrote:wasnt the unedited master found on a reel?
Probably, but it's not found on FTD!



User avatar

drjohncarpenter
Posts: 109974
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Location: United States of America
Has thanked: 12389 times
Been thanked: 37835 times
Age: 90

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by drjohncarpenter »

JimmyCool wrote:I was listening to the version of "Crawfish" on the new FTD Book+CD of "King Creole" and I noticed that Kitty White's vocals are very low in the mix (and with a lot of echo too.)

I'm more familiar with the version on "The Complete '50s Masters," where her voice is way more upfront an with much less echo (if any.)

[snip]

... how did they do different mixes of Kitty White's vocals with what's left? It's impossible having just mono masters... :-?
Radio Recorders had binaural ("safety") capability, so the film master and the unedited acetate performance clearly derive from different mix-downs of the safety reels. The acetate is dryer, more raw than the film mix. Note that all acetates had to have been cut by Thorne Nogar at Radio Recorders.

1/15/58
Track F - T7 Crawfish (basic) 2:45


.
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!

User avatar

KingOfTheJungle
Posts: 2414
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by KingOfTheJungle »

It would seem that with "Crawfish", the binaural tapes were recorded so that the Elvis master track would be in mono on one channel, with the second channel being Kitty White's vocal track, since most of the difference in mix concerns only White's vocal.

I can think of 4 alternate mixes of Crawfish off the top of my head:
1)The album version, as heard on the Franklin Mint set.
2) The 50's box version- which may be the version from the 7" EP (I need to check)
3) The extended acetate with more Kitty White
4) The movie mix, which features White singing a duet with Elvis during the verses.

The fact that the basic tracks sounds essentially the same would suggest that White's vocal occupies it's own track (the way Elvis's does in 'Baby I Don't Care', so even if the binaural master is found we wouldn't get a "stereo" effect like we do on some of the Jailhouse sessions.


King Of The Jungle

User avatar

KingOfTheJungle
Posts: 2414
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by KingOfTheJungle »

Just checked the EP, it's the same as the echo drenched album master.


King Of The Jungle

User avatar

KiwiAlan
Posts: 11660
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by KiwiAlan »

There is no evidence anywhere that the King Creole sessions were recorded in binaural.....there was no need, the stereo requirement for sVistaVision was dropped by the time King Creole went into production.

The sessions were made and paid for by Paramount...not RCA.

The tape legend states recorded "two track"...don't be fooled by this. This is still mono recorded on both tracks running in the same direction. Some will remember David Bendeth when talking about the mono tracks restoration how the picked the best mono track from the two track tape.

Any back-up tapes would also be in mono.


When you get to the point where you really understand your computer, it's probably obsolete

User avatar

drjohncarpenter
Posts: 109974
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Location: United States of America
Has thanked: 12389 times
Been thanked: 37835 times
Age: 90

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by drjohncarpenter »

KiwiAlan wrote:There is no evidence anywhere that the King Creole sessions were recorded in binaural...
Ha ha ha!


.
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!


Matthew

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by Matthew »

KiwiAlan wrote:Some will remember David Bendeth when talking about the mono tracks restoration how the picked the best mono track from the two track tape.
I'm not so sure you're remembering this correctly. From my understand the tape is 1-track mono and at transfer was played back on a 2-track tape machine thus creating a digital 2-track transfer where one or t'other could be picked in case of drop-outs.



User avatar

Steve G
Posts: 379
Registered for: 16 years
Has thanked: 93 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by Steve G »

I love this song and Kitty's contribution to it.



User avatar

EPA4368
Posts: 4897
Registered for: 14 years 5 months
Has thanked: 1374 times
Been thanked: 673 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by EPA4368 »

..

This one uploaded by SophyaAgain August 27, 2010 is pretty good.

This is probably one of the best openings to an Elvis movie.



User avatar

Topic author
JimmyCool
Posts: 5817
Registered for: 17 years 1 month
Location: Viña del Mar, Chile
Mood:
Has thanked: 1020 times
Been thanked: 2259 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by JimmyCool »

luckyjackson1 wrote:Could it be they have both mono-tapes, the one with the original mix (Kitty White low in the mix with echo) AND the "dry" version?
Maybe this could be the case, but not having heard or read about it anywhere... I really don't know.
drjohncarpenter wrote:Radio Recorders had binaural ("safety") capability, so the film master and the unedited acetate performance clearly derive from different mix-downs of the safety reels. The acetate is dryer, more raw than the film mix. Note that all acetates had to have been cut by Thorne Nogar at Radio Recorders.

1/15/58
Track F - T7 Crawfish (basic) 2:45
I know that, the film master, the film version and the acetate have three different mixes (extra vocals by Kitty White on the second.)
But as far as we know, we only had the studio master and the acetate (unedited version.)

I made an A-B test of the version on "The Complete '50s Masters" and the "FTD" version and I noticed some things:
- The version on "The Complete '50s Masters" runs almost 0.5% too slow (0.46% to be exact) so I had to speeded it up a little.
- The version on "FTD" have a fade in and a fade out (the other version has a fade out too, but here it's more prominent.)
- The version on "FTD" has a lot of echo, specially on Kitty White's vocals and she's down in the mix. On the "Complete '50s Masters" her voice is upfront, same as Elvis, sounding like a duet.

I uploaded this sample, so you can hear the differences:
CRAWFISH
(Headphones are recommended)

Right Channel = "Crawfish" (The King Of Rock 'n' Roll - The Complete '50s Masters)
Left Channel = "Crawfish" (King Creole - FTD)

Interesting, huh? :wink:
Last edited by JimmyCool on Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:13 pm, edited 7 times in total.


Note: This post is intended solely for FECC forum readers. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this post is strictly prohibited.

User avatar

Deke Rivers II
Posts: 1180
Registered for: 20 years 8 months
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by Deke Rivers II »

Ernst has stated that the Master Tape to the Acetate Version of "Crawfish" was found and that he is waiting for the proper place to release it? I would have thought that this new FTD Book/cd would have been a great place but maybe it is being held for the Classic FTD version of the Soundtrack. Hopefully a few other surprises will be included.



User avatar

KiwiAlan
Posts: 11660
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by KiwiAlan »

I repeat there is no evidence of binaural recording.


When you get to the point where you really understand your computer, it's probably obsolete

User avatar

Topic author
JimmyCool
Posts: 5817
Registered for: 17 years 1 month
Location: Viña del Mar, Chile
Mood:
Has thanked: 1020 times
Been thanked: 2259 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by JimmyCool »

KiwiAlan wrote:I repeat there is no evidence of binaural recording.
WWE: Were the KING CREOLE sessions possibly recorded in BINAURAL?
Ernst Jorgensen: Yes, but no tapes are known to exist.

Source: World Wide Elvis
How could they mix Kitty White's vocals if not recorded in binaural?
See my post above and hear the sample. :)


Note: This post is intended solely for FECC forum readers. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this post is strictly prohibited.

User avatar

KiwiAlan
Posts: 11660
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by KiwiAlan »

JimmyCool wrote:
KiwiAlan wrote:I repeat there is no evidence of binaural recording.
WWE: Were the KING CREOLE sessions possibly recorded in BINAURAL?
Ernst Jorgensen: Yes, but no tapes are known to exist.

Source: World Wide Elvis

I disagree with Ernst on this................that's why no takes have ever surfaced.

Just like Elvis Christmas Album and Elvis.

There were two recording studios at Radio Recorders. One, the bigger one was, was equipped for binaural the smaller annex was not in 1958.

(Kitty Whites contribution was recorded at Paramount)


When you get to the point where you really understand your computer, it's probably obsolete

User avatar

luckyjackson1
Posts: 9176
Registered for: 14 years 7 months
Location: Germany, pretty close to Bad Nauheim
Has thanked: 1855 times
Been thanked: 1183 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by luckyjackson1 »

I'm not so sure you're remembering this correctly. From my understand the tape is 1-track mono and at transfer was played back on a 2-track tape machine thus creating a digital 2-track transfer where one or t'other could be picked in case of drop-outs.
Matthew, I recall hearing this too. This sounds likely. Or at least it's a good possibility.


When the evening shadows fall
And you're wondering who to call
For a little company
There's always me

User avatar

KiwiAlan
Posts: 11660
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by KiwiAlan »

But if you recorded a mono track onto a two track ...........wouldn't each of the two tracks sound the same as one another


When you get to the point where you really understand your computer, it's probably obsolete


Matthew

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by Matthew »

KiwiAlan wrote:But if you recorded a mono track onto a two track ...........wouldn't each of the two tracks sound the same as one another
Sure.



User avatar

Topic author
JimmyCool
Posts: 5817
Registered for: 17 years 1 month
Location: Viña del Mar, Chile
Mood:
Has thanked: 1020 times
Been thanked: 2259 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by JimmyCool »

JimmyCool wrote:
luckyjackson1 wrote:Could it be they have both mono-tapes, the one with the original mix (Kitty White low in the mix with echo) AND the "dry" version?
Maybe they did, but I haven't heard or read about it anywhere... so I don't know
drjohncarpenter wrote:Radio Recorders had binaural ("safety") capability, so the film master and the unedited acetate performance clearly derive from different mix-downs of the safety reels. The acetate is dryer, more raw than the film mix. Note that all acetates had to have been cut by Thorne Nogar at Radio Recorders.

1/15/58
Track F - T7 Crawfish (basic) 2:45
I know that, the film master, the film version and the acetate have three different mixes (extra vocals by Kitty White on the second.)
But as far as we know, we only had the studio master and the acetate (unedited version.)

I made an A-B test of the version on "The Complete '50s Masters" and the "FTD" version and I noticed some things:
- The version on "The Complete '50s Masters" runs almost 0.5% too slow (0.46% to be exact) so I had to speeded it up a little.
- The version on "FTD" have a fade in and a fade out (the other version has a fade out too, but here it's more prominent.)
- The version on "FTD" has a lot of echo, specially on Kitty White's vocals and she's down in the mix. On the "Complete '50s Masters" her voice is upfront, same as Elvis, sounding like a duet.

I uploaded this sample, so you can hear the differences:
CRAWFISH
(Headphones are recommended)

Right Channel = "Crawfish" (The King Of Rock 'n' Roll - The Complete '50s Masters)
Left Channel = "Crawfish" (King Creole - FTD)

Interesting, huh? :wink:
KiwiAlan wrote:(Kitty Whites contribution was recorded at Paramount)
Apparently ONLY the parts not featured on the unedited acetate... And, as far as I know, the only vocals overdubs done after the sessions were "Lover Doll" and "Steadfast, Loyal And True" done by the Jordanaires on June 19 and a few extra backings done on location (or maybe post-production.)
KiwiAlan wrote:But if you recorded a mono track onto a two track ...........wouldn't each of the two tracks sound the same as one another
That's my point... In the case of Kitty White's part, she apparently recorded her vocals of the master version on the same date as Elvis' (January 15,) so if it wasn't overdubed later (and I'm pretty sure it wasn't) then a binaural tape was needed to produce two different mixes of the same song!

So, as KingOfTheJungle pointed out earlier, we have 4 different versions of "Crawish":
1. Unedited master acetate.
2. King Creole (RCA LPM 1884 and FTD.)
3. The King Of Rock 'n' Roll - The Complete '50s Masters.
4. The movie version (unedited master + extra vocals by Kitty White on location... or maybe post-production.)

There's nothing weird with 1. and 4., but having the tapes lost/misplaced (mono or binaural), then 2. and 3. should have the SAME mix, instead of Kitthy more upfront or back in the mix...
Any more theories?
Last edited by JimmyCool on Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:13 pm, edited 4 times in total.


Note: This post is intended solely for FECC forum readers. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this post is strictly prohibited.

User avatar

luckyjackson1
Posts: 9176
Registered for: 14 years 7 months
Location: Germany, pretty close to Bad Nauheim
Has thanked: 1855 times
Been thanked: 1183 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by luckyjackson1 »

When I first heard the 50s box version I thought they simply "cleaned up" the acetate they used previously on Essential 3 and cut Kitty White's a-capella singing...

Hey, I was seventeen...! :oops: :D


When the evening shadows fall
And you're wondering who to call
For a little company
There's always me

User avatar

davide
Posts: 1745
Registered for: 21 years 8 months
Location: Brighton,Sussex,UK
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 1444 times

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by davide »

Image

Kiity White sang her movie vocal's on location in New Orleans

Davide



User avatar

drjohncarpenter
Posts: 109974
Registered for: 21 years 9 months
Location: United States of America
Has thanked: 12389 times
Been thanked: 37835 times
Age: 90

Re: A question about "Crawfish"

Post by drjohncarpenter »

KiwiAlan wrote:
JimmyCool wrote:
KiwiAlan wrote:I repeat there is no evidence of binaural recording.
WWE: Were the KING CREOLE sessions possibly recorded in BINAURAL?
Ernst Jorgensen: Yes, but no tapes are known to exist.

Source: World Wide Elvis

I disagree with Ernst on this................
Ha ha ha ha ha!

davide wrote:Image

Kiity White sang her movie vocal's on location in New Orleans
Thanks for posting the sheet from Thorne's mix-down to mono.

I'm pretty sure the Kitty White "Crawfish" vocal you reference is just the live segment from early March heard on location in the movie, not the studio master recorded in January.


.
Dr. John Carpenter, M.D.
Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!