Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:20 am










Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:50 am
Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:58 am
elvisfan_48079 wrote:Actually Doc, one chevron (stripe) indicates the rank of private E-2. If Elvis were a private 1st class (PFC) E-3 he would have one chevron with a rocker beneath it. Here are the ranks Elvis held during his military career;
E-1: private (often referred to as buck private)
E-2: private
E-3: private first class (PFC)
E-4: specialist 4th class (often referred to as spec4)
E-5: sargeant (often referred to as buck sargeant)
I'll leave it up to the more informed to provide the dates when he achieved each rank.
Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:59 am
. Bye for now
.Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:09 am
elvisfan_48079 wrote:Actually Doc, one chevron (stripe) indicates the rank of private E-2. If Elvis were a private 1st class (PFC) E-3 he would have one chevron with a rocker beneath it. Here are the ranks Elvis held during his military career;
E-1: private (often referred to as buck private)
E-2: private
E-3: private first class (PFC)
E-4: specialist 4th class (often referred to as spec4)
E-5: sargeant (often referred to as buck sargeant)
I'll leave it up to the more informed to provide the dates when he achieved each rank.
.Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:18 am
Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:28 am
Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:46 am
Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:48 am
Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:01 am
Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:08 am
THEMEMPHISFAN wrote:doc, Sorry, man. You haven't completely proven your theory. What you're saying doesn't totally add-up. LPM-1951 may have made its first appearance on Billboard in December of 1960, but it is still most likely that it was first released in 1958. Look at the assigned album numbers in chronological order. Why would the new cover version of Elvis' Christmas Album be issued in late 1960 with the #LPM-1951 ? It just wouldn't make since for that number to be a 1960 issue.
Look at these assigned mono album numbers. They're all in progressing numerical order as released over time:
1958 releases:
LPM-1707 ELVIS' GOLDEN RECORDS
LPM-1884 KING CREOLE
LPM-1951 ELVIS' CHRISTMAS ALBUM
1959 releases:
LPM-1990 FOR LP FANS ONLY
LPM-2011 A DATE WITH ELVIS
LPM-2075 50,000,000 ELVIS FANS CAN'T BE WRONG
1960 releases:
LPM-2231 ELVIS IS BACK!
LPM-2256 G.I. BLUES
LPM-2328 HIS HAND IN MINE
THEMEMPHISFAN
Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:41 am
THEMEMPHISFAN wrote:ekenee wrote: "My first thought was that too, but then I checked Tunzi's sessions III book on the matter.
It would seem this was the order.
1957- LOC-1035 Chrismas Album.
1958-LPM-1951 Christmas Album with same cover, but this time without the gatefold."
ekenee, Hold your horses. THIS is exactly what is printed in Tunzi's book on page 482:
1958
LPM-1951 ELVIS' CHRISTMAS ALBUM
(Reissue of LOC 1035 without gatefold cover and booklet of color photos. Selections are the same.)
It does not read "with same cover". Are you a politician in Washington, D.C.?!![]()
THEMEMPHISFAN
Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:05 pm
Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:12 pm
elvisfan_48079 wrote:Doc, I personally believe you have more than proven your premise given the information provided. I simply wanted to correct this error in your post ...
Mike Windgren wrote:Doc, as always your articles are very well researched, they are outstanding. Sorry, I can´t add anything else
. Thank you very much
. Bye for now
.
Frankie Teardrop wrote:In the Motown LP numbering order, MT-642 was issued in September 1968. MT-643 came out in February 1966. There are plenty of similar anomalies in catalogue numbers from other companies as well. They aren't fully accurate in terms of release order.
Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:16 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:
What makes this topic so interesting is how, for years, almost every discography placed EPA 4340 and LPM 1951 in 1958.
Whoops!
Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:20 pm
Hav-A-Tampa wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote:
What makes this topic so interesting is how, for years, almost every discography placed EPA 4340 and LPM 1951 in 1958.
Whoops!
Thanks doc, this is one of those topics that makes FECC the best site for true fans.
Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:32 pm
Mike Windgren wrote:Hi there!!![]()
![]()
elvisfan_48079 wrote:Actually Doc, one chevron (stripe) indicates the rank of private E-2. If Elvis were a private 1st class (PFC) E-3 he would have one chevron with a rocker beneath it. Here are the ranks Elvis held during his military career;
E-1: private (often referred to as buck private)
E-2: private
E-3: private first class (PFC)
E-4: specialist 4th class (often referred to as spec4)
E-5: sargeant (often referred to as buck sargeant)
I'll leave it up to the more informed to provide the dates when he achieved each rank.
I´m actually a NATO OR-7 or an U.S.A Senior Chief Petty Officer, so Sergeant Elvis Presley salute!. Bye for now
.
Mike Windgren.
Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:12 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:elvisfan_48079 wrote:Doc, I personally believe you have more than proven your premise given the information provided. I simply wanted to correct this error in your post ...
Thank you, and I have amended the reference.Mike Windgren wrote:Doc, as always your articles are very well researched, they are outstanding. Sorry, I can´t add anything else
. Thank you very much
. Bye for now
.
Thank you, Mike! It took a while to evaluate and compile.Frankie Teardrop wrote:In the Motown LP numbering order, MT-642 was issued in September 1968. MT-643 came out in February 1966. There are plenty of similar anomalies in catalogue numbers from other companies as well. They aren't fully accurate in terms of release order.
Correct.
What I did not include in the original post is that the original album was still being offered and sold in the holiday seasons after 1957, and is mentioned in concert with LPM 1951 (the reissue) during the 1960 holiday period.
Otherwise, the absence in 1958 of the new EP and LP reissue in any form is overwhelming evidence that they did not yet exist in the marketplace. The same rule applies in 1959, where one sees NO mention of the LP reissue anywhere, but does observe ads and reviews for the new EP.
What some do not understand is seasonal records have a necessarily limited shelf life, and any remaining stock is held over until the next year. In Elvis' case, these records were good sellers, and so the same titles were made available again and again either by overstock or new pressings. EPA 4108 is an example of a very successful release, returning to the charts and hitting #1 two years after it debuted.
What makes this topic so interesting is how, for years, almost every discography placed EPA 4340 and LPM 1951 in 1958.
Whoops!
Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:57 pm
Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:29 pm
Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:33 pm
THEMEMPHISFAN wrote:... for a supposed late in the year 1960 release, why in the world would RCA use all pre-1960 photos on the front and back of the LP?
Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:36 pm
Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:39 pm
painterboy wrote:Hello Doc,This is some info that I have.I hope it may be of some help.
The first appearance of LPM-1951 was in November 1959, featuring the back sleeve below.
Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:43 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:THEMEMPHISFAN wrote:... for a supposed late in the year 1960 release, why in the world would RCA use all pre-1960 photos on the front and back of the LP?
That question was answered in my original post.
---
Some continue to miss the core findings:
1) There is NO mention of the new EP until Christmas 1959
2) There is not a word printed about the LP reissue -- not just the charts, but ANYTHING, ads, previews, listings -- until Christmas 1960
Again, that's very strong supporting evidence for the correct release dates.
Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:52 pm
THEMEMPHISFAN wrote:... don't you think it was odd that all the photos used on LPM-1951 were pre-1960? Do you think it's possible that the re-issue was designed and made in '58 or '59, but not actually released until late 1960? (I think someone else already mentioned that possibility)
ekenee wrote:Wouldn't this information still be in RCA files?
Wouldn't Ernst if he had the time, could check on this?
If the 1960 date is correct, how would so many authors have the date set at 1958. Someone must have remembered back when they bought the album.
And if true, that would mean that the original LP would be on the shelves for the Christmas season 1958 and 1959 with no competition with itself and still not chart?
Hosted by ElviCities