Sun May 27, 2007 1:39 am
Thanks..my singing does not include you now..Mike S wrote:Juan Luis wrote:Whats the friggin fuss about an album that never was?
Just a guess, but I reckon this comes about through having few friends and far too much time on your hands.
However, as has already been pointed out, this thread serves a very useful purpose for insomniacs.
Sun May 27, 2007 1:41 am
Daryl wrote:Hello,
I wrote:How do you know for sure that the "Standing Room Only" LP would have used the Feb./Mar. '72 material?
Matthew wrote:However, there is more evidence that Standing Room Only would have contained said Feb/March material than there is that it would have contained April material.
What more evidence that "Standing Room Only" was the Feb./Mar. '72 material? A compilation CD. You recently seemed to have a problem with Gerry not answering your question. So answer my question:
How do you know for sure that the "Standing Room Only" LP would have used the Feb./Mar. '72 material?
Sun May 27, 2007 1:42 am
Sun May 27, 2007 1:45 am
Juan Luis wrote:where is my Hound Dog?!
Sun May 27, 2007 1:48 am
Daryl wrote:How do you know for sure that the "Standing Room Only" LP would have used the Feb./Mar. '72 material?
Sun May 27, 2007 1:55 am
Matthew wrote:Juan Luis wrote:where is my Hound Dog?!
I'm pretty certain the album was scrapped due to the lack of a decent rendition of Hound Dog
Sun May 27, 2007 2:00 am
Is that a possibility or the mock session was just that. A mock (without quotes) to have EP on tour film have a stopover and be "caught" on film recording future hits?drjohncarpenter wrote:
When MGM's cameras filmed a "mock" session at RCA's Hollywood studios on March 30, the brief number of songs chosen was in part due to the hybrid nature of the intended album
Sun May 27, 2007 2:01 am
Juan Luis wrote:Matthew wrote:Juan Luis wrote:where is my Hound Dog?!
I'm pretty certain the album was scrapped due to the lack of a decent rendition of Hound DogI have been recognized!!
Sun May 27, 2007 2:07 am
Sun May 27, 2007 2:08 am
That would be great if seen only as how HD "progressed" but the funky intro was better performed and recorded at MSG. Subjective but trying to get away with my assertiveness as much as I can!Matthew wrote:Juan Luis wrote:Matthew wrote:Juan Luis wrote:where is my Hound Dog?!
I'm pretty certain the album was scrapped due to the lack of a decent rendition of Hound DogI have been recognized!!
Actually a more plausable structure for Standing Room Only was to be a retrospective on the developement of Hound Dog over the years. The progression from the original recording to the current stage version. Side A was said to contain:
Hound Dog '56 master
Hound Dog '56 Ed Sullivan Show
Hound Dog '68 Special
Hound Dog '69 live complete with intro monologue
Hound Dog '72 live with funky intro.
However the prospect of a 9 minute side caused the powers that be to re-plan their intentions and hence the mock up track listing for Standing Room Only mentioned above.
How do I know this? Well it just makes sense doesn't it?! And that ladies and gentlemen is all I need.
Sun May 27, 2007 2:17 am
Sun May 27, 2007 2:28 am
Sun May 27, 2007 2:36 am
Sun May 27, 2007 8:04 am
Daryl wrote:Doc, that's Peter Guralnick's writing, again speculative.
Sun May 27, 2007 8:20 am
People on this MB have a choice -- buy the poop you're selling, or give more weight to Matthew and my input. Guess who they'll choose, Daryl?
Sun May 27, 2007 11:01 am
You can't stop me. You can only hope to contain me.
Sun May 27, 2007 11:12 am
Sun May 27, 2007 12:08 pm
Daryl wrote:Hello,
Where exactly has anyone written that the "Standing Room Only" LP was to consist of the Feb. '72 masters and the March '72 studio recordings? How do you know for sure that the "Standing Room Only" LP would have used the Feb./Mar. '72 material?
Daryl
Sun May 27, 2007 1:24 pm
Sun May 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Sun May 27, 2007 1:47 pm
Sun May 27, 2007 1:56 pm
He was just there...Union related something..not particular of interest to me..but Joe was in a lot of sessions as guitar etc..but no ..he was no musician that participated.Steve_M wrote:What instrument was "Joseph Esposito" playing ?
Sun May 27, 2007 2:04 pm
On what book is that photocopy I posted?Mike S wrote:Alright, you win.
If we're going to finally resolve this dispute, we need to try a different tack. It seems to me that the main problem we are experiencing is that we're dealing with previously published material which inevitably lends itself to be challenged and dismissed as a matter of course.
What we need is someone with exclusive access to previously unknown sources / material which will settle this vitally important matter once and for all.
They helped us before on the 'Aloha thread,' we need them even more here--Delboy and Liverbobs where are you?
Sun May 27, 2007 2:09 pm
Sun May 27, 2007 2:27 pm
Mike S wrote:And so it continues....
Daryl's proud boast:You can't stop me. You can only hope to contain me.
proves true.
A bit like Bindweed really and with similar results.
Hosted by ElviCities