Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:54 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:poormadpeter wrote:... it is no small wonder he is not held in such high regard artistically.
Those who do not hold Elvis' greatest achievements, and overall career, as one of the greatest of all time, are simply ignorant. Not too many artists change the world. He was one of them.
Tue Dec 25, 2012 4:09 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:Why in the world, with all the beautiful, unreleased Presley footage in existence, would EPE want to craft a project showing his downfall? How would it be sold to the public? It's depressing to consider such circumstances.
drjohncarpenter wrote: is delusional to think a re-edit with improved sound "would impress most people." Elvis' singing is uneven at best on the June tour, and his voice control is very poor overall. To be in strong voice a singer must be in good health.
drjohncarpenter wrote:Presley is in poor health..
drjohncarpenter wrote:... watching 35 years later will only give credence to "I Really Don't Want To Know" or "My Way."
drjohncarpenter wrote: ..if most of his set had been well-sung it would be overshadowed by his shocking appearance.
drjohncarpenter wrote:1977. Not a good year.
Tue Dec 25, 2012 6:52 pm
Johnny2523 wrote:Elvis can clearly be seen thinner than on Rapid City.... On footage as well as photo graphs on this show doc.
Elvis lost 18 lbs if i remember right.
Tue Dec 25, 2012 7:14 pm
Delboy wrote:Just played the CBS Elvis in Concert video for the first time in years; had to switch it off. It is seriously painful viewing. I know Elvis (and CP) were in financial trouble but how they thought this would get them back on track is beyond me. Hard work. If you think having this in Blue-Ray or surround sound etc will improve it you are delusional I think a dose of the 68 special is in order.
Tue Dec 25, 2012 9:53 pm
Tue Dec 25, 2012 10:04 pm
stevelecher wrote:What is remarkable about Unchained Melody in this special is he gets through it, not that it's particularly good. Most non fans upon hearing this are not impressed with it and think it's pretty awful. Hurt come off quite a bit better. If this was ever released it wouldn't impress people, it would make them sad.
Tue Dec 25, 2012 10:08 pm
stevelecher wrote:What is remarkable about Unchained Melody in this special is he gets through it, not that it's particularly good. Most non fans upon hearing this are not impressed with it and think it's pretty awful. Hurt come off quite a bit better. If this was ever released it wouldn't impress people, it would make them sad.
Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:59 am
Liverbobs wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote:poormadpeter wrote:... it is no small wonder he is not held in such high regard artistically.
Those who do not hold Elvis' greatest achievements, and overall career, as one of the greatest of all time, are simply ignorant. Not too many artists change the world. He was one of them.
One of the best response posts I've seen on here! well said Doc.
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:04 am
FredAistair wrote:stevelecher wrote:What is remarkable about Unchained Melody in this special is he gets through it, not that it's particularly good. Most non fans upon hearing this are not impressed with it and think it's pretty awful. Hurt come off quite a bit better. If this was ever released it wouldn't impress people, it would make them sad.
No accounting for the variable views on Unchained Melody, personally I go with this one.
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/137 ... n-tonight/
"But oddly, the next track I'm likely to play is "Unchained Melody", the second to last cut on the set, recorded in 1977 during one of his final shows. As you can see from a stirring YouTube, Elvis during this period is bloated, caked in horrifying makeup, and drugged, a shell of a man only months away from death. But somehow, sitting down at the piano, he manages to wring something out of this song that no one else had imagined. It's garish, operatic, and morbid, and I feel a little guilty for how much I love it; Elvis failed in so many ways, but this was his one untouchable thing, and I love hearing him do it in spite of it all, speaking to the world in the one language he thoroughly mastered."
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:14 am
Xaykev wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote:Why in the world, with all the beautiful, unreleased Presley footage in existence, would EPE want to craft a project showing his downfall? How would it be sold to the public? It's depressing to consider such circumstances.
Because it is a very fascinating and interesting story. Are all the great documentaries fairytales?
Xaykev wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote: is delusional to think a re-edit with improved sound "would impress most people." Elvis' singing is uneven at best on the June tour, and his voice control is very poor overall. To be in strong voice a singer must be in good health.
You don't get it do you? The main key to how a EIC documentary should be made is to prove that despite a failing health, drug abuse etc..Elvis could still sing.
Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:47 am
Johnny2523 wrote:@Doc, This looks like a overweight, rapid city elvis to you??
Wed Dec 26, 2012 12:54 pm
Spanish_Eyes wrote:Johnny2523 wrote:@Doc, This looks like a overweight, rapid city elvis to you??
Isn't that second pic from 1974?
Wed Dec 26, 2012 7:05 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:Xaykev wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote:Why in the world, with all the beautiful, unreleased Presley footage in existence, would EPE want to craft a project showing his downfall? How would it be sold to the public? It's depressing to consider such circumstances.
Because it is a very fascinating and interesting story. Are all the great documentaries fairytales?
We're not talking about a documentary on the catastrophic Haiti earthquake in 2010, the subject is a singer who changed the world, brought joy to millions and was handsomer than ten movie stars.
The 1977 footage is depressing. Period. And there are hundreds of hours of film of Elvis in his prime that deserve release first.Xaykev wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote: is delusional to think a re-edit with improved sound "would impress most people." Elvis' singing is uneven at best on the June tour, and his voice control is very poor overall. To be in strong voice a singer must be in good health.
You don't get it do you? The main key to how a EIC documentary should be made is to prove that despite a failing health, drug abuse etc..Elvis could still sing.
Yes, in June 1977 Elvis could open his mouth and sound came out. But no matter how one reworks the existing 1977 materials, the quality of his vocals will be seen as substandard, and a reflection of his very poor health and appearance.
As I've said many times before, we do not honor the man and his legacy by deluding ourselves that he had no fallow periods. And the only way to justify an official release of the June 1977 CBS tapes is to pretend that it offers Elvis looking and sounding "good."
Let's not live in fantasy land. Elvis deserves better.
Wed Dec 26, 2012 8:20 pm
Wed Dec 26, 2012 8:57 pm
jurasic1968 wrote:A fan like myself likes Elvis anyway and the TV special can be realized on DVD(...)
Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:01 pm
JimmyCool wrote:I know this would probably do more bad than good to Elvis' image and legacy, but I would like to see it released on DVD someday soon (both shows and whatever else was recorded) as a limited edition just for us, (hardcore) fans.
After all, it's not like the average person hasn't seen it on YouTube already...
Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:50 pm
elvis-fan wrote:Johnny2523 wrote:Elvis can clearly be seen thinner than on Rapid City.... On footage as well as photo graphs on this show doc.
Elvis lost 18 lbs if i remember right.
I think you may be confusing Elvis' bloated face from the abuse of dilaudid (his appearance from June 18-21) vs. his appearance only a few days later during that tour once the swelling in his face had gone down... Regardless, on June 26 Elvis was obviously under the influence and it is clearly evident during this performance.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Thu Dec 27, 2012 10:10 pm
Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:52 am
Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:49 pm
stevelecher wrote:KHoots wrote:stevelecher wrote:poormadpeter wrote:He may not have been dying in the terminal illness sense, but it all amounts to pretty much the same thing, albeit at his own hands.
Thus my statement, he wasn't dying, he was killing himself. We do agree.
Educate me. Someone who is killing himself isn't dying? I believe that is exactly what someone who is killing themself is doing. If the body is beginning to shut down--however slowly or quickly, and particularly if it's by ones own hand--that equals dying. No?
Really KHoots? You can't see the difference? A man dying of cancer is dying. He's wasting away and there's nothing he can do to stop it. Elvis........kept up and increased his daily regimen of dangerous medications until one day his body and heart quit.....
Sat Dec 29, 2012 4:48 pm
Jokerlola wrote:elvis-fan wrote:Johnny2523 wrote:Elvis can clearly be seen thinner than on Rapid City.... On footage as well as photo graphs on this show doc.
Elvis lost 18 lbs if i remember right.
I think you may be confusing Elvis' bloated face from the abuse of dilaudid (his appearance from June 18-21) vs. his appearance only a few days later during that tour once the swelling in his face had gone down... Regardless, on June 26 Elvis was obviously under the influence and it is clearly evident during this performance.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Since when does Dilaudis cause bloated face.
Sat Dec 29, 2012 5:27 pm
dr borgo wrote:It is my understanding that most of the EIC special was footage taken from Rapid City SD and very little of the June 19th Omaha concert was used. I have watched both shows on You Tube and I think Elvis seemed to be in better spirits during the Omaha show than he did in Rapid City. Other than Charlie's mic being turned up way to loud amplifying his painfully off key vocals, the show itself seemed to move along a little better (for that tour at least). I suppose that was the main reason to cull most of that show from the final edit. In the backstage footage from Rapid City, Elvis looks like he is dreading the moment the curtain is pulled back for his stage entrance.
Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:25 am
elvisjock wrote:Jerry Hopkins erroneously reported that all performances save for My Way derived from Rapid City. My Way, in fact, was not performed in Omaha. It was in the Rapid City show.
Omaha footage contained in the final edit of the special includes parts of See See Rider and Can't Help Falling In Love, along with complete performances of Teddy Bear/Don't Be Cruel, How Great Thou Art and Early Morning Rain.
Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:43 pm
Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:54 pm
Wiebe wrote:I'm one of those diluted fans that's craving for an official DVD release of all the material. It's a true Elvis experience. Maybe they should just use the best of Omaha, because there are some weaker moments there. I have a friend that's not a fan. I left a copy of the DA Cincinatti 76 release in his car and he won't give it back. He prefers the 76/77 stuff over the overbearing 69/72 stuff( his words not mine) Most people I know that are not as emotionally involved with Elvis like most of us on here really don't get the drama. They think he looks okay in 77 and the singing is good. I think you can edit EIC SE into a positive special or a dramatic one like they did in 77.
Hosted by ElviCities