Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:26 pm
Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:41 pm
Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:38 pm
Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:23 pm
brian wrote:With regards to pay per view that's not all the Rolling Stones cable providers charge that and make money off that as well.
pro wresting and boxing are higher than that on pay per view.
prices for concert tickets have been absolutely outrageous since the 90s but since people still buy them and it's where these performers make their money it's not going to stop.
It is a rip off.
If everyone would stop buying the tickets then the ticket prices would eventually be lowered.
Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:32 am
Bodie wrote:brian wrote:With regards to pay per view that's not all the Rolling Stones cable providers charge that and make money off that as well.
pro wresting and boxing are higher than that on pay per view.
prices for concert tickets have been absolutely outrageous since the 90s but since people still buy them and it's where these performers make their money it's not going to stop.
It is a rip off.
If everyone would stop buying the tickets then the ticket prices would eventually be lowered.
I just think as wealthy as the Rolling Stones are, there is no need to have this final concert as a pay-per-view event.
I would like to have seen this concert but to hell with paying 14.95 to see it.
This is what angers me with boxers, so many of them are greedy and want a slice of the pay-per-view takings.
They tried that with English Football but it didn't work.
Look at David Beckham, goes to the States cause he wants to promote football but i guess the $120million contract (or whatever it was) didn't have anything to do with it, if any country needed any help for its future success its his own country, England. Most overrated footballer the world has ever seen. He would do a commercial for just about anything if he was paid enough.
Fri Dec 07, 2012 9:15 am
Fri Dec 07, 2012 9:35 am
Bodie wrote:After the ridiculous high prices the Rolling Stones ask for their recent shows at the 02 Arena in London, i have just seen them plugging their final show on Sky where its being shown as a pay-per-view event for 14.95![]()
How much money can these aging rockers get before they are happy?
They made millions from this 50th anniversary tour so why don't they put this final event on Sky where fans and others interested in watching it don't have to spend a one-off payment just to see this show?
As great as they are, i've lost alot of respect for this band.
Fri Dec 07, 2012 9:23 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:Bodie wrote:After the ridiculous high prices the Rolling Stones ask for their recent shows at the 02 Arena in London, i have just seen them plugging their final show on Sky where its being shown as a pay-per-view event for 14.95![]()
How much money can these aging rockers get before they are happy?
They made millions from this 50th anniversary tour so why don't they put this final event on Sky where fans and others interested in watching it don't have to spend a one-off payment just to see this show?
As great as they are, i've lost alot of respect for this band.
As great as they were, you mean.
Sat Dec 08, 2012 1:21 am
Sat Dec 08, 2012 11:41 am
MB280E wrote:Is that £14.95 or $14.95? Not that great amount of money imo, but of course being a millionaire...
Sincerely MB280E
Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:19 pm
Bodie wrote:brian wrote:With regards to pay per view that's not all the Rolling Stones cable providers charge that and make money off that as well.
pro wresting and boxing are higher than that on pay per view.
prices for concert tickets have been absolutely outrageous since the 90s but since people still buy them and it's where these performers make their money it's not going to stop.
It is a rip off.
If everyone would stop buying the tickets then the ticket prices would eventually be lowered.
I just think as wealthy as the Rolling Stones are, there is no need to have this final concert as a pay-per-view event.
I would like to have seen this concert but to hell with paying 14.95 to see it.
This is what angers me with boxers, so many of them are greedy and want a slice of the pay-per-view takings.
They tried that with English Football but it didn't work.
Look at David Beckham, goes to the States cause he wants to promote football but i guess the $120million contract (or whatever it was) didn't have anything to do with it, if any country needed any help for its future success its his own country, England. Most overrated footballer the world has ever seen. He would do a commercial for just about anything if he was paid enough.
Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:53 pm
Mon Dec 17, 2012 9:02 pm
Hosted by ElviCities