Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:40 pm
DEH wrote:Complaining does not Help. Not when its nitpicking.
Thu Nov 22, 2012 7:01 pm
Mike S wrote:DEH wrote:Complaining does not Help. Not when its nitpicking.
It's not nitpicking. There are fundamental flaws with the way the material has been presented in this set and unsurprisingly some people are not happy with that.
If you are happy with this set, then good for you. However there are others here who are disappointed that this material has not been presented in a better fashion and do not want to see these errors repeated on future releases. By registering their disatisfaction, their voice is being heard, simple as that.
Thu Nov 22, 2012 7:43 pm
Fri Nov 23, 2012 1:45 am
Jamie wrote:Fundamental flaws my a @"!
I have watched the DVD twice and know which songs have footage so I can use the song select if I wish. No big issue. The documentary is good, the press conference could be better but I still enjoyed it. Sony employed one of the highest rated producers around and I doubt that comes cheap. Check his history he is not some Coldplay guy but has a huge catalogue covering a wide range of artists including Dylan legacy releases. You may not like the presentation of the music but that doesn't mean it's fundamentally flawed. Many like it as is. This is a lovely well thought out package no doubt done on a tight budget. Oh and the booklet is lovely piece of work.
Just a thought but a wider dynamic range doesn't make an audiophile product. It's a good start but the mix can still be screwed up. Whilst I have always enjoyed the various versions of MSG it's because I love the show. Elvis sounds miles away and his voice thin when compared to the fuller vocals we now get.
Cheers Jamie
Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:04 am
a mess of polk salad wrote:Jamie wrote:Fundamental flaws my a @"!
I have watched the DVD twice and know which songs have footage so I can use the song select if I wish. No big issue. The documentary is good, the press conference could be better but I still enjoyed it. Sony employed one of the highest rated producers around and I doubt that comes cheap. Check his history he is not some Coldplay guy but has a huge catalogue covering a wide range of artists including Dylan legacy releases. You may not like the presentation of the music but that doesn't mean it's fundamentally flawed. Many like it as is. This is a lovely well thought out package no doubt done on a tight budget. Oh and the booklet is lovely piece of work.
Just a thought but a wider dynamic range doesn't make an audiophile product. It's a good start but the mix can still be screwed up. Whilst I have always enjoyed the various versions of MSG it's because I love the show. Elvis sounds miles away and his voice thin when compared to the fuller vocals we now get.
Cheers Jamie
Spot on!
Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:09 am
Jamie wrote:Just a thought but a wider dynamic range doesn't make an audiophile product.
Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:34 am
Matthew wrote:Jamie wrote:Just a thought but a wider dynamic range doesn't make an audiophile product.
Not on its own no. PFAP is a strange hybrid, we have a modern, compressed (almost restricted sounding) mix married with mastering from an engineer renowned for his audiophile aesthetics. In this case the result is far from audiophile philosophy.
On the other hand Vic Anesini's remastering of the original 1972 mix is excellent. Say what you will about the original mix - it is what it is, but the mix has been mastered without additional compression applied and with tasteful EQ.
As I listen to these shows I am coming to the conclusion that the drive to achieve a "in the 4th row" sound was better achieved by FTD's "Live On Stage In Memphis" release from 2004. The Prince mixes don't really achieve the same result - Elvis' vocal sound oddly detached from the rest of the sound elements, including the backing voices. The original mix finds Elvis' vocal track sitting with the rest of the band. Prince is not terrible, but it's not quite "right" either.
The original mix certainly has a dryer overall sound where as the new mix is slightly wetter - more reverb, but particularly on Elvis' vocal. Verdict is still out. One thing is for sure though, Jerry's all important bass solo in Polk Salad Annie has still never sounded better than on the original 1972 Madison Square Garden mix. Prince is far better than the likes of Afternoon and Live In Texas but still not quite as good as the punchy mixed to the front result of MSG.
Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:41 am
King Volcano wrote:Would you say the sort of tinny down the drain type sound from the 90s BMG CD is gone from the ES Legacy Matthew?
Fri Nov 23, 2012 8:33 am
Matthew wrote:Jamie wrote:Just a thought but a wider dynamic range doesn't make an audiophile product.
Not on its own no. PFAP is a strange hybrid, we have a modern, compressed (almost restricted sounding) mix married with mastering from an engineer renowned for his audiophile aesthetics. In this case the result is far from audiophile philosophy.
On the other hand Vic Anesini's remastering of the original 1972 mix is excellent. Say what you will about the original mix - it is what it is, but the mix has been mastered without additional compression applied and with tasteful EQ.
As I listen to these shows I am coming to the conclusion that the drive to achieve a "in the 4th row" sound was better achieved by FTD's "Live On Stage In Memphis" release from 2004. The Prince mixes don't really achieve the same result - Elvis' vocal sound oddly detached from the rest of the sound elements, including the backing voices. The original mix finds Elvis' vocal track sitting with the rest of the band. Prince is not terrible, but it's not quite "right" either.
The original mix certainly has a dryer overall sound where as the new mix is slightly wetter - more reverb, but particularly on Elvis' vocal. Verdict is still out. One thing is for sure though, Jerry's all important bass solo in Polk Salad Annie has still never sounded better than on the original 1972 Madison Square Garden mix. Prince is far better than the likes of Afternoon and Live In Texas but still not quite as good as the punchy mixed to the front result of MSG.
Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:12 am
Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:30 am
Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:33 am
Fri Nov 23, 2012 1:48 pm
Matthew wrote:PFAP is a strange hybrid, we have a modern, compressed (almost restricted sounding) mix married with mastering from an engineer renowned for his audiophile aesthetics. In this case the result is far from audiophile philosophy.
Matthew wrote:As I listen to these shows I am coming to the conclusion that the drive to achieve a "in the 4th row" sound was better achieved by FTD's "Live On Stage In Memphis" release from 2004.
Matthew wrote:Elvis' vocal sound oddly detached from the rest of the sound elements, including the backing voices....Prince is not terrible, but it's not quite "right" either....One thing is for sure though, Jerry's all important bass solo in Polk Salad Annie has still never sounded better than on the original 1972 Madison Square Garden mix. Prince is..... still not quite as good as the punchy mixed to the front result of MSG.
Fri Nov 23, 2012 5:39 pm
Fri Nov 23, 2012 5:45 pm
Fri Nov 23, 2012 5:55 pm
Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:12 pm
Brian Quinn wrote:Whilst I think that both afternoon and evening shows have been greatly improved I do feel that the opening of the afternoon show to be somewhat muted compared to AAITG. The crowd reaction seems to have been lost somewhat amongst the band/orchestra.
So far PFAP has appeared in the following Charts:
Dutch - 57
Austria - 62
UK - 74
USA - 187.
Brian
Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:18 pm
Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:09 pm
Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:15 pm
Johnny2523 wrote:Brian Quinn wrote:Whilst I think that both afternoon and evening shows have been greatly improved I do feel that the opening of the afternoon show to be somewhat muted compared to AAITG. The crowd reaction seems to have been lost somewhat amongst the band/orchestra.
So far PFAP has appeared in the following Charts:
Dutch - 57
Austria - 62
UK - 74
USA - 187.
Brian
those numbers are actually quite good for the first 2 weeks.
Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:37 pm
Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:50 pm
Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:54 pm
Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:47 pm
Matthew wrote:Aren't most music purchases made online these days?
Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:03 pm
Jamie wrote:Mike S wrote:DEH wrote:As for the sound, this new mix isn't for me as levels have been artificially raised making it sound muddy and constricted on a good hi-fi system. Admittedly I haven't tried it on my car stereo which may be less forgiving. It would be interesting to hear what Matthew and other sound enthusiasts have to say on this in due course.
I understand what you say about the sound as there isn't a wide spread of instruments/vocals across the soundstage. Brauer is also renouned for his use of compression which may explain the sense of the dynamics being restricted. However, having said that the remit was to put you in the fourth row of the Stadium and I think it achieves that brilliantly. It is an exciting sound and there is still enough clarity to follow JB's guitar, different drums, etc. There is plenty of bass and kick drums and Elvis vocals are crystal clear. It isn't a dry almost studio recording like the 72 Vegas releases for instance but if it was I think we would have lost the sense of occassion, excitement and passion. Ideally, the DVD could have carried a studio mix and concert mix but that's just a dream.
I would say it's like the Memphis 74 take on a mix which whilst not an audiophile recorording again really captures that sense of being there. I certainly don't think I will be playing the original CD's again as I really like the approach taken - Elvis vocals sound superb.
Hosted by ElviCities