Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:15 am
Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:19 am
Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:21 am
BIGREDG wrote:How could any decent person write such a question?
You completely fail to comprehend my reply and then have the gall to type crap like the above. Shame on you.
May 19, 2007
Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:27 am
Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:30 am
kuenzer wrote: Please ... stop ... you're hurting Elvis ... you're hurting the MB ... you're hurting America ... with your irrational rhetoric ... please ... stop ...
Oct 06, 2006
Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:31 am
Mike S wrote:Whoosh!
My point was to highlight your hypocrisy, not your opinion -- once was enough for that.
(18th Sept.'08)
Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:37 am
Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:38 am
BIGREDG wrote:kuenzer wrote: Please ... stop ... you're hurting Elvis ... you're hurting the MB ... you're hurting America ... with your irrational rhetoric ... please ... stop ...
Oct 06, 2006
<Aside: That is the classic one - was that me damaging America?>
Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:40 am
kuenzer wrote: That's a fact you can take to the bank.
Feb 25, 2009
Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:43 am
Mike S wrote:Oh come on, you're kidding right?
(3rd March '09)
Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:50 am
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:04 am
Mike S wrote:Do you have a mirror handy?
(11th March '09)
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:07 am
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:11 am
Mike S wrote:You wouldn't see the truth if it was shot by a particle beam directly into your eyes at point blank range.
(16th June '08)
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:17 am
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:21 am
BIGREDG wrote:
From your comments, you wouldn't know "the real world" if it were shot from a cannon and hit you squarely on the ass.
Why don't you try "Chat-Talk" for the fantasy world you seek? Buh-bye.
Sep 12, 2006
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:23 am
Mike S wrote:All of those comments are completely off-base. And the "high" quote is inaccurate, both in word and attribution.
If you are going to make a valid point, don't try to sell it with a bunch of deleted - see guidelines #2
(17th May '08)
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:27 am
Mike S wrote:All of those comments are completely off-base. And the "high" quote is inaccurate, both in word and attribution.
If you are going to make a valid point, don't try to sell it with a bunch of deleted - see guidelines #2
(17th May '08)
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:29 am
BIGREDG wrote:It's accurate, according to all current information. You really have English comprehension issues.
Jun 06, 2008
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:32 am
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:37 am
Mike S wrote:We need some banners on this topic, ASAP.
(3rd March '09)
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:39 am
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:44 am
Mike S wrote:Just making a point with gentle humour, I will look forward to your future posting.
(18th Nov '08)
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:48 am
Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:56 am
Mike S wrote:Your point here alludes us....
(24th April '08)
Hosted by ElviCities