Post here your Elvis' pictures

We´re Presley fans - and we´re angry (mag article)

Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:55 pm

We´re Presley fans - and we´re angry
by Patricia Gayle Lash
Screen Album, May-July 1957
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: We´re Presley fans - and we´re angry (mag article)

Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:57 pm

And the last three pages...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: We´re Presley fans - and we´re angry (mag article)

Sun Feb 03, 2013 1:24 am

Again, a wonderful magazine...how i wish to go back in time to find all these magazines in the paper stands - reading today a magazine like this is like i'm there, in the middle of Presley controversy.
Thank you very much, what can i say, just...keep 'em coming, please :smt006

PS: do you have the back cover, too? Because on the lase page we can read "if this picture doesn't prove that Elvis looks like a Greek god, then look at the back cover of this magazine"

Re: We´re Presley fans - and we´re angry (mag article)

Sun Feb 03, 2013 1:54 am

hilton22000 wrote:PS: do you have the back cover, too? Because on the lase page we can read "if this picture doesn't prove that Elvis looks like a Greek god, then look at the back cover of this magazine"

Ah, yes. It´s this familiar photo. I didn´t want to post this, because the quality is bad as you can see. But here it is.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: We´re Presley fans - and we´re angry (mag article)

Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:19 am

Superb, as always, thank you.

Great images!

Re: We´re Presley fans - and we´re angry (mag article)

Sun Feb 03, 2013 3:15 am

You Rock the fool!
Reading these old mags are so nice!

Re: We´re Presley fans - and we´re angry (mag article)

Sun Feb 03, 2013 3:41 am

You are very welcome, George. And you, too, the person who has lost the letter "d" from his name. :D I appreciate your comments.

Re: We´re Presley fans - and we´re angry (mag article)

Sun Feb 03, 2013 3:54 am

hilton22000 wrote:Again, a wonderful magazine...how i wish to go back in time to find all these magazines in the paper stands - reading today a magazine like this is like i'm there, in the middle of Presley controversy.

This is just like I feel. My favourite Elvis period is 1968-72. I adore Elvis´ voice of the 1960-63 recordings. He sang like an angel. The 50´s have always been somewhat distant to me. I mean, I understand that was the time Elvis shook the world. I know how important and influential those recordings were. But I was not there. I was born in 1965. I have to rely on other persons telling how great Elvis was back then. And these 50s magazines are a great way to experience part of that. It really was a different world back then.

Re: We´re Presley fans - and we´re angry (mag article)

Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:22 am

Fun stuff! The piece is just something for the girls, but the photos are a treat.

First of all, who doesn't love seeing baby Princess Leia (AKA Carrie Fisher), born October 21, 1956, on the cover with mom Debbie?

And, even more exquisite, we have a previously-unknown live shot of Elvis, performing in Houston at the Sam Houston Coliseum on October 13, 1956!


561013_Houston TX_fixed.JPG


Wish we had the unedited image. Still, this IS rock 'n' roll!

Thanks, The fool.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by drjohncarpenter on Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

Re: We´re Presley fans - and we´re angry (mag article)

Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:42 am

Here's the unedited image, but, unfortunately, it's cropped.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: We´re Presley fans - and we´re angry (mag article)

Sun Feb 03, 2013 5:50 am

Awesome. Thanks again The fool!! ::rocks

Re: We´re Presley fans - and we´re angry (mag article)

Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:00 am

hilton22000 wrote:Here's the unedited image, but, unfortunately, it's cropped.


Thanks. The image in the magazine is reversed. Fixed that.