Tue Nov 29, 2011 3:53 am
Sun Dec 04, 2011 9:13 pm
Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:58 am
Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:45 pm
poormadpeter wrote:It is, without doubt, a phenomenal record. It's particular strange to think that You'll Never Walk Alone is probably the weakest track on the album, and yet still very few artists in the world would struggle to ever record anything of that greatness. Old Man River is, indeed, remarkable - perhaps only ever beaten by the rendition for the 1967 TV special with Ella and Jobim, which I think just clinches it when comparing Sinatra's performances of that song. Soliloquy and I have Dreamed are so very special. Much of this album also saw its way into Sinatra's live performances: I Have Dreamed, My Heart Stood Still, Bewitched, Soliloquy, Old Man River and even Lost In The Stars in the 1980s.
Despite the praise, it's not an album I return to as often as some of the other lesser efforts in Sinatra's catalogue. Like the equally-good September of my Years, it requires a certain mood to be able to appreciate it, with neither album at all suitable for background music. This and SOMY are albums which demand 100% attention from the listener - and there is nothing wrong with that whent he music is this good - but more often than not we don't listen to music in that way these days.
Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:00 am
Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:51 am
Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:27 am
Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:31 am
greystoke wrote:I can't recall whether the stunning reissue of The Concert Sinatra was discussed on another post once this thread had ran its brief course, but after finding myself - once again - engrossed in this album, I thought it warranted another mention. The new remix/remaster revealing depths, detail and facets in both Nelson's arrangements and Sinatra's voice that haven't been this appreciable since the original recording sessions.
What has been done with The Concert Sinatra, almost fifty years after being recorded, is nothing short of outstanding -- the restoration, remastering and remixing of the original master tapes proving so costly that such was done at a certain loss, with the quality and integrity of the final product being paramount regardless of spending.
Most highly recommended!
Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:50 am
Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:27 pm
greystoke wrote:Thanks, Doc. The Concert Sinatra was released in May of 1963 and first charted on June 2nd. It spent 35 weeks on Billboard's album chart, peaking at No. 6. In the UK, it first charted on July 27th and peaked at No. 8 during an 18 week stay.
Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:37 pm
greystoke wrote:Opening with Rodgers and Hammerstein's I Have Dreamed, the mood is firmly set, with the most lush strings and broadly spacious sound that Sinatra laps up with a vocal so delicious that one cannot help become wholly immersed.
Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:36 am
Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:13 am
George Smith wrote:greystoke wrote:Opening with Rodgers and Hammerstein's I Have Dreamed, the mood is firmly set, with the most lush strings and broadly spacious sound that Sinatra laps up with a vocal so delicious that one cannot help become wholly immersed.
'I Have Dreamed' is perfection: one of the great hidden gems from the Sinatra catalogue.
Some good discussions here gentlemen, thank you.
Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:51 am
poormadpeter wrote:The record was released in late May. Confirmed in the three-volume sessionography/discography Sinatrafile by Sinatra expert John Ridgeway.
Thu Jul 12, 2012 3:04 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:poormadpeter wrote:The record was released in late May. Confirmed in the three-volume sessionography/discography Sinatrafile by Sinatra expert John Ridgeway.
"Late May"?
How odd Reprise didn't place a Billboard ad until almost a month later, and the weekly held off reviewing the new Reprise LP for over a month. I guess this new label had no interest in selling new product by its #1 artist.
"Confirmed"?
Fans here are well aware of the fallibility of the JAT Presley sessionography/discography books. Now, since none of us have this Sinatra tome, please share what source this "expert" references, instead of a pair of sentences anyone could have written.
In lieu of any other valid information, I'll stick to the contemporaneous material I posted above as overwhelming evidence of an early-to-mid-June release.
Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:50 pm
.
Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:52 pm
Mike Windgren wrote:Hi there!!![]()
![]()
.
Frank Sinatra is my 2º music passion.
poormadpeter, please let me know where I can get this Sinatrafiles books. I can´t find them anywhere. Thank you!. Bye for now
.
Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:24 pm
poormadpeter wrote:If ...
Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:35 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:poormadpeter wrote:If ...
It seems you reference a book you yourself do not possess. Thanks for sharing.
People may make up their own minds on the release date:
- Contemporaneous articles and ads from the #1 music weekly
- Secondhand declarations from a book no one owns
The choice is pretty clear.
Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:43 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:poormadpeter wrote:If ...
It seems you reference a book you yourself do not possess. Thanks for sharing.
People may make up their own minds on the release date:
- Contemporaneous articles and ads from the #1 music weekly
- Secondhand declarations from a book no one owns
The choice is pretty clear.
Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:47 pm
greystoke wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote:poormadpeter wrote:If ...
It seems you reference a book you yourself do not possess. Thanks for sharing.
People may make up their own minds on the release date:
- Contemporaneous articles and ads from the #1 music weekly
- Secondhand declarations from a book no one owns
The choice is pretty clear.
Or we could just read the back cover of the Warner Bros./Reprise CD release that says "LP originally released May, 1963."
Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:39 am
poormadpeter wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote:poormadpeter wrote:If ...
It seems you reference a book you yourself do not possess. Thanks for sharing.
People may make up their own minds on the release date:
- Contemporaneous articles and ads from the #1 music weekly
- Secondhand declarations from a book no one owns
The choice is pretty clear.
I never said I don't possess it?
drjohncarpenter wrote:Fans here are well aware of the fallibility of the JAT Presley sessionography/discography books. Now, since none of us have this Sinatra tome, please share what source this "expert" references, instead of a pair of sentences anyone could have written.
Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:55 am
greystoke wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote:poormadpeter wrote:If ...
It seems you reference a book you yourself do not possess. Thanks for sharing.
People may make up their own minds on the release date:
- Contemporaneous articles and ads from the #1 music weekly
- Secondhand declarations from a book no one owns
The choice is pretty clear.
Or we could just read the back cover of the Warner Bros./Reprise CD release that says "LP originally released May, 1963."
Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:29 am
drjohncarpenter wrote:greystoke wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote:poormadpeter wrote:If ...
It seems you reference a book you yourself do not possess. Thanks for sharing.
People may make up their own minds on the release date:
- Contemporaneous articles and ads from the #1 music weekly
- Secondhand declarations from a book no one owns
The choice is pretty clear.
Or we could just read the back cover of the Warner Bros./Reprise CD release that says "LP originally released May, 1963."
Yes! How easy was that?
You are certainly knowledgeable enough to well know that major label CD reissues are not infallible. So to suggest this statement is definitive is a bit cavalier. Think of the miscues we know from following Elvis CDs on RCA, BMG, Sony or FTD.
I'm a stickler for facts and historical accuracy. This topic cited no chronology of any kind until my input. Additional research I've posted here strongly implies a June release.
Reprise had been sold to Warner Brothers just prior to the releases seen in the above June 1963 ad, and the label was all about getting better numbers at retail than what had gone down since 1960. So a May 1963 release would strongly imply May 1963 publicity and push from the Reprise sales department. But I could find none.
If anyone -- besides me -- is able to produce something credible and definitive to support an earlier release date, bring it on.
Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:31 am
drjohncarpenter wrote:greystoke wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote:poormadpeter wrote:If ...
It seems you reference a book you yourself do not possess. Thanks for sharing.
People may make up their own minds on the release date:
- Contemporaneous articles and ads from the #1 music weekly
- Secondhand declarations from a book no one owns
The choice is pretty clear.
Or we could just read the back cover of the Warner Bros./Reprise CD release that says "LP originally released May, 1963."
Yes! How easy was that?
You are certainly knowledgeable enough to well know that major label CD reissues are not infallible. So to suggest this statement is definitive is a bit cavalier. Think of the miscues we know from following Elvis CDs on RCA, BMG, Sony or FTD.
I'm a stickler for facts and historical accuracy. This topic cited no chronology of any kind until my input. Additional research I've posted here strongly implies a June release.
Reprise had been sold to Warner Brothers just prior to the releases seen in the above June 1963 ad, and the label was all about getting better numbers at retail than what had gone down since 1960. So a May 1963 release would strongly imply May 1963 publicity and push from the Reprise sales department. But I could find none.
If anyone -- besides me -- is able to produce something credible and definitive to support an earlier release date, bring it on.
Hosted by ElviCities