Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:40 am
Little Darlin wrote:Rich,
You can get Closing night from Mahola over in the Trade Section...the link to his shop is on there. No sign of Huntsville yet though.
Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:03 am
Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:41 am
thenexte wrote:Mike S wrote:thenexte wrote:So is this really more complete than the previous boots and from a better audio source? Can someone can confirm this?
As I wrote previously:-
The upcoming Madison production is stated to be taken directly from the original two reels of tape that were used to record this show and therefore promises to be complete.
Previous issues of this show were incomplete because no-one seemed to have access to both reels. The most recent re-issue of this show last year was simply a cut and paste excercise which was consequently still incomplete. Now for the first time, you will get to hear the complete show, including the ending which has never been heard anywhere before!
The sound is also improved, making this the best sounding release of this great show.
I'm not interested in the marketing pitch, I would like to hear from people that have actually compared the Madison release with the previous boots. More specifically what are the tracks that are new to this release and have never been released before? Anybody?
Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:43 am
Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:46 am
londonflash wrote:Can't wait to get this one!
Looking forward to your review, Mike.
Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:39 pm
Mike S wrote:If you had followed this thread carefully you would have noticed that I have completed a review of this release which will be added to this site shortly. From this, careful deduction would suggest that I had actually heard this CD and was not simply quoting a 'marketing pitch.' Therefore my view was an informed one, particularly with regard to sound quality.
Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:53 pm
Rob wrote:Mike S wrote:If you had followed this thread carefully you would have noticed that I have completed a review of this release which will be added to this site shortly. From this, careful deduction would suggest that I had actually heard this CD and was not simply quoting a 'marketing pitch.' Therefore my view was an informed one, particularly with regard to sound quality.
You mean to tell me that you actually listen to these CD's before you review them? I just thought you were good! Anyone could do it that way, Mike.
Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:58 pm
Fri Jun 22, 2007 2:00 pm
Fri Jun 22, 2007 2:50 pm
Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:42 pm
Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:43 pm
Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:58 pm
Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:27 pm
Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:01 pm
BIGREDG wrote:Hey Mike, you should do a full review for the board
Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:23 pm
Mike S wrote:thenexte wrote:Mike S wrote:thenexte wrote:So is this really more complete than the previous boots and from a better audio source? Can someone can confirm this?
As I wrote previously:-
The upcoming Madison production is stated to be taken directly from the original two reels of tape that were used to record this show and therefore promises to be complete.
Previous issues of this show were incomplete because no-one seemed to have access to both reels. The most recent re-issue of this show last year was simply a cut and paste excercise which was consequently still incomplete. Now for the first time, you will get to hear the complete show, including the ending which has never been heard anywhere before!
The sound is also improved, making this the best sounding release of this great show.
I'm not interested in the marketing pitch, I would like to hear from people that have actually compared the Madison release with the previous boots. More specifically what are the tracks that are new to this release and have never been released before? Anybody?
You asked for confirmation regarding extra tracks and sound quality. If you had followed this thread carefully you would have noticed that I have completed a review of this release which will be added to this site shortly. From this, careful deduction would suggest that I had actually heard this CD and was not simply quoting a 'marketing pitch.' Therefore my view was an informed one, particularly with regard to sound quality.
Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:28 pm
thenexte wrote:Mike, no offense, but certainly there is a difference in saying:
a) "The upcoming Madison production is stated to be taken directly from the original two reels of tape that were used to record this show and therefore promises to be complete."
and
b) "I have verified that the just released Madison production is taken directly from the original two reels of tape that were used to record this show and therefore is complete."
The former one is a forward looking statement, which is a statement that cannot sustain itself as merely a historical fact. The latter one is a statement that verifies that fact. Definitely your review (which was not available at the time I posted this) makes this more clear, so thanks for clarifying that.
Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:31 pm
kuenzer wrote: How can a mere listener be sure that nothing is cleverly edited out?
Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:38 pm
BIGREDG wrote:kuenzer wrote: How can a mere listener be sure that nothing is cleverly edited out?
Or indeed cleverly edited in??
Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:44 pm
Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:57 pm
BIGREDG wrote:Clever after the fact ??
Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:01 pm
kuenzer wrote:BIGREDG wrote:Clever after the fact ??
So a Monday morning quaterback is clever after the fact?
kuenzer wrote: After a little research I found now: to paper/smooth over the cracks.
Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:06 pm
BIGREDG wrote:kuenzer wrote: After a little research I found now: to paper/smooth over the cracks.[/size]
Ah, another quaint English turn of phrase, but is this really what you meant?
Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:10 pm
Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:28 pm
Mike, no offense, but certainly there is a difference in saying:
a) "The upcoming Madison production is stated to be taken directly from the original two reels of tape that were used to record this show and therefore promises to be complete."
and
b) "I have verified that the just released Madison production is taken directly from the original two reels of tape that were used to record this show and therefore is complete."
The former one is a forward looking statement, which is a statement that cannot sustain itself as merely a historical fact. The latter one is a statement that verifies that fact.
Definitely your review (which was not available at the time I posted this) makes this more clear, so thanks for clarifying that.
Hosted by ElviCities