Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:05 am
Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:09 am
Elvis' Babe wrote:
as for the beatles--nothing i said was false.
Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:14 am
Cryogenic wrote:Ah ... trust the wonderful Promocollector to spin everything out of context!
Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:16 am
Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:27 am
Elvis' Babe wrote:so all the guys with gray/white long beards and hippie wear that i went to go see lord of the rings with in OJAI, CALIFORNIA weren't hippies? lol. they still have teepee communities up there. my sister-in-law's mother used to live in a teepee. (i have slightly entertaining extended family.)
don't think for a second that the hippies just disappeared after the '60s.
Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:39 am
Promocollector wrote:Cryogenic wrote:Ah ... trust the wonderful Promocollector to spin everything out of context!
So i take it you agree then that the Beatles persuaded a generation to take drugs as has been claimed? Obviously you do!
carolynlm wrote:I might also be a good idea to keep a portion of your families history to yourself....I would be just a tad upset if my daughter were to spread out our dirty laundry on a public forum.
Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:45 am
Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:55 am
Elvis' Babe wrote:they also persuaded a legion to do drugs and stone out an entire generation..
Cryogenic wrote:The verb that Elvis' Babe used was "inspire"[d], not "persuade"[d]. There's a difference. Quite a big one.
Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:58 am
Promocollector wrote:Elvis' Babe wrote:they also persuaded a legion to do drugs and stone out an entire generation..Cryogenic wrote:The verb that Elvis' Babe used was "inspire"[d], not "persuade"[d]. There's a difference. Quite a big one.
There is a difference, but as i have quoted the word was persuade not inspire.![]()
![]()
Read and learn
Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:00 am
Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:08 am
PEP wrote:However, the Beatles are to blame if that's the right word
by default...because whatever they did in their personal lives
and in public, people in general who followed them
wanted to do exactly what they were doing....an
in return followed like sheep...
PEP
Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:14 am
Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:48 am
Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:48 am
Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:31 am
Elvis' Babe wrote:btw--elvis did not just mention the beatles in his letter. that is often ignored. he also mentioned jane fonda and the black panthers by name. neither were in the music industry, and neither were directly interfering with his career. which is why the beatles vs. elvis defense mechanism stuff doesn't work quite so much.
Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:36 am
Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:42 am
Elvis' Babe wrote:actually, i'm sorry, it was john lennon whom he mentioned specifically. he listed lennon in the bit with fonda and the panthers.
Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:52 am
Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:07 am
Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:00 am
Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:38 am
Elvis' Babe wrote:
as for promocollector--i'll take you on in egyptology any time.let's start with 'what was the narmer palate?' you don't like that one. how about 'which country was ramses II taken to to treat his remains for fungus, and he received a military salute at the airport?'... or how about 'what was the name of ramses II's first born son who is possibly the first born son in the exodus?'
or on another topic--name all 6 wives of henry VIII and his 3 children--give me the fates of all of them. give me the full birthname of mozart. give me the name of the chief executioner of the romanovs. how about the names of the family members in age-order and how old they were when each died, and who was present at the execution. what were beethoven's favorite foods? recite to me from memory, edgar allan poe's annabel lee.
or here's one that cryo probably would know: what kind of freighter is the millennium falcon?
i'm sure there are plenty of things i know that you don't and i am sure there are gobs of things you know that i don't. that doesn't make me stupid or you superior and vice versa.
but hey, if you want me to start the wacky trivia contest thread in off-topic, just ask.
if anything i was humble on my vague knowledge of specifics regarding elvis. and thank you n8 for being mature about this. it has been a big headache day today from things not having to do with here, so i'm off.
Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:32 am
Elvis' Babe wrote: ...... thank you n8 for being mature about this.
LittleDarlin wrote:N8 You are never gonna win this
Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:27 am
Elvis' Babe wrote:weird, because i swear i read something from the nixon meeting where lennon and fonda were specifically mentioned ... admittedly this has been at least a year since i looked at anything regarding this meeting--it has been at least that long since we've discussed it here.
Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:37 am
Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:38 am
drjohncarpenter wrote:Elvis' Babe wrote:weird, because i swear i read something from the nixon meeting where lennon and fonda were specifically mentioned ... admittedly this has been at least a year since i looked at anything regarding this meeting--it has been at least that long since we've discussed it here.
Less than a year, actually.
What is "weird" is someone who utters falsehoods, again and again and again, about the content of Elvis' letter to Nixon:
January 2006: Elvis, Tina (& Ike)
February 2006: Presidential visit
April 2006: Why The Attack On The Beatles, In His Letter To Nixon?!
Why? Far keener minds are welcome to unravel this mystery.
-----
It is quite easily accessible online:
Elvis Presley's Letter To President Richard Nixon
Hosted by ElviCities