Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:59 am
woodleyjohn wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote:
I fully endorse Mike Sanders's (sic) discussion of my previously cited quandry (sic) , and virtually all of his critiques. Debate away!
Who is Mike Sanders?
Who is the Doc?
Sun Dec 03, 2006 3:17 am
Sun Dec 03, 2006 4:08 am
In show business, performers often perform under circumstances beyond their control or they have chaos going on at the time in their personal lives.
This should not be ammunition for a negative review.
Sun Dec 03, 2006 4:45 am
Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:39 am
As if to say you heard them, but weren't listening. Man, I am having a hard time getting my point across.
If you listen carefully he starts naming movie titles,(which are also songs) and he is surprised at each one he names he gets a huge applause. So he just keeps naming things to get a "reaction". I think it just amused him. You don't really think Elvis thought he made a movie called "return to sender"? Do You? These are the kind of negative assumptions I don't care for.
Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:59 am
Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:19 pm
Pseudonym wrote:I know M.Sanders & would like to say he is a nice guy (one of the good guys)... I have my suspicions on the Doc, but we must adhere to the rules of this MB & keep these "suspicions" to ourselves.
Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:35 pm
ekenee wrote:So you really think Elvis thought he made a movie called, "return to sender" as you state in your review? You are basically saying he was so out of it that he didn't know what he was saying.
This is plain ludicrous.
Sun Dec 03, 2006 6:28 pm
ekenee wrote:I bet there are about 10,000 people who were actually there that would agree with me on this one.
Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:03 pm
Deke Rivers II wrote:Maybe this performance doesn't appear as bad as it was touted but never the less Elvis had problems and was not on the top of his game.
Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:35 pm
Hosted by ElviCities