Thu Jun 23, 2005 5:56 am
Thu Jun 23, 2005 4:10 pm
Sat Jun 25, 2005 5:36 am
Sat Jun 25, 2005 5:39 am
Sat Jun 25, 2005 6:09 am
Kylan wrote:Quasar, after having browsed your posts since you've been on the board, i must say im terribly touched by your deep feelings and affection for Elvis.
Sat Jun 25, 2005 8:00 am
I don't consider myself a "fan" since it is short for "fanatic" which defines a person marked or motivated by an extreme, unreasoning enthusiasm
Sat Jun 25, 2005 8:02 am
Sat Jun 25, 2005 8:37 am
Sat Jun 25, 2005 8:40 am
ColinB wrote:Oh, I reckon the meaning of the word has evolved a bit since it was first coined.
These days, to be a 'fan' of an artist simply means that you enjoy their work above that of others.
Sat Jun 25, 2005 8:41 am
Kylan wrote:I don't sit and analyze what a word in the dictionary means. I just enjoy Elvis Presley and what he means to me.
Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:43 pm
quasar3 wrote:I'm sure many here have seen this letter, (what penmanship), but some may not have.
For discussion: Why do you think it was so important to him to take such a position, and to fancy himself integrating as an accepted member of the non-Establishment? Communist brainwashing techniques?
Sat Jun 25, 2005 3:59 pm
Sun Jun 26, 2005 12:21 am
quasar3 wrote:As much as EP was alleged to have been a "searcher" and a reader,
Sun Jun 26, 2005 12:25 am
carolynlm wrote:quasar,
You are wrong to assume that every post on this board is a favourable comment made toward Elvis. We have quite a number of disagreements over Elvis and his contribution to the music world. That's what makes this board as interesting as it is. But we are all here for the one reason, and that is because we still love the man, and the music he has made, even when we are aware that he was just a normal human being, like most of us. If by being interested in not only the lifestyle Elvis had, and having the ability to literally pull apart every note he had ever sung, is being fanatical, then so be it, but don't condemn those on the board for having this ability. Are you the type of person who thinks of the glass as half empty? Do you purposely try to put a negative aspect on everything? Elvis didn't have the education that we have had, but he was forever (and this is a proven fact) trying to improve his knowledge about things. He was forever asking questions. He was confident enough to actually write a letter to his President, and see it through by requesting a meeting. AND GETTING IT.....this act in itself still astounds me......don't tell me Elvis was not an intelligent man, there are people out there who have degrees in everything from political science to ......whatever.....but couldn't tell you how to put 3 musical notes together......I certainly can't and I consider myself to be of average intelligence........so his penmanship....handwriting wasn't great, have you ever tried to read a doctors prescription......??????
or their notes made in hospital records? If you would ever take the time to study 'handwriting' you will find that most genius' had the same type of handwriting......as I have said in a previous thread, sometimes some of us judge Elvis by todays standards, and that's a big mistake.
Sun Jun 26, 2005 12:37 am
Melanie wrote: What's so strange knowing about communist techniques? Even I do, because I have a keen interest in history.
Sun Jun 26, 2005 12:46 am
carolynlm wrote:quasar,
You are wrong to assume that every post on this board is a favourable comment made toward Elvis.
Do you purposely try to put a negative aspect on everything?
He was confident enough to actually write a letter to his President, and see it through by requesting a meeting. AND GETTING IT.....this act in itself still astounds me......
don't tell me Elvis was not an intelligent man, there are people out there who have degrees in everything from political science to ......whatever.....but couldn't tell you how to put 3 musical notes together......I certainly can't and I consider myself to be of average intelligence........
. . . sometimes some of us judge Elvis by todays standards, and that's a big mistake.
Sun Jun 26, 2005 12:58 am
quasar3 wrote:carolynlm wrote:quasar,
You are wrong to assume that every post on this board is a favourable comment made toward Elvis.
Then you shouldn't mind my comments at all.Do you purposely try to put a negative aspect on everything?
Nothing much about his lifestyle or the later music was positive, and no one would agree with that more than EP himself.He was confident enough to actually write a letter to his President, and see it through by requesting a meeting. AND GETTING IT.....this act in itself still astounds me......
If that astounds you, your standards must not be very high. A great many people met Nixon, myself included. So what. (Btw, his visit was viewed as a joke by the insiders at the WH.)don't tell me Elvis was not an intelligent man, there are people out there who have degrees in everything from political science to ......whatever.....but couldn't tell you how to put 3 musical notes together......I certainly can't and I consider myself to be of average intelligence........
His musical knowledge was extremely limited.
He was a searcher and loved to read, but he was never able to expand outside the limited scope of his southern Baptist, flag-loving mentality.
Had he listened to those few who tried, he'd have accomplished great things, considering his potential.. . . sometimes some of us judge Elvis by todays standards, and that's a big mistake.
It has nothing to do with today's standards - it's all about the facts back then, and who knows truth from fiction.
It's pretty simple, if you know what you're talking about.
Sun Jun 26, 2005 12:59 am
Melanie wrote:Penmanship isn't an issue as long as nobody gets hurt.
I don't see any hypocrisy in wanting to fight illegal drugs.
The White House staff didn't think he was a hypocrite or a dumb hillbilly.
What's so strange knowing about communist techniques?
I doubt Nixon followed up on anything Elvis said, some people read way too much into this meeting.
Jerry Schilling talks about that day . . .
Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:06 am
drjohncarpenter wrote:For discussion: why have you chosen to embrace the spirit of Albert Goldman with the majority of your postings on this messageboard?
Quit wasting your time -- and ours.
DJC
Sun Jun 26, 2005 2:47 am
quasar3 wrote:A great many people met Nixon, myself included.
Sun Jun 26, 2005 4:15 am
Net wrote:So now you're alleging you met Nixon too?
Sun Jun 26, 2005 4:42 am
Kylan wrote:he accomplished more and made more people happy in one hr of his 42 yrs of his life then you will if you lived 100 times over. You seem to have alot of time on your hands so go find yourself an enjoyable hobby and have a good time, and peddle ur contemptable crap somewhere else. Its not wanted here obviously if you have any observational skills.
Sun Jun 26, 2005 4:46 am
Net wrote:quasar3 wrote:As much as EP was alleged to have been a "searcher" and a reader,
Do you also "allege" that he was a singer?
Sun Jun 26, 2005 6:05 am
Sun Jun 26, 2005 6:24 am
carolynlm wrote:You seem to have nothing but utter contempt for Elvis.
I do know that most of the people of the US hold their Presidents in the highest regard, . . .
I sincerely hope that this persona you have shown to us is not your true self, how could someone go through their lives with such a chip on their shoulder?
Hosted by ElviCities