Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:38 am
Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:48 am
Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:47 am
Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:13 am
shanebrown wrote:All in all, the album works.
shanebrown wrote:It's not the near masterwork of its predecessor ...
shanebrown wrote:Why Moody Blue was held back when it would have provided a slight bit of relief to the maudlin ballads is anyone's guess - and typical of how Presley's output was handled at the time.
Wed Jan 10, 2007 9:04 am
shanebrown wrote:I feel like I'm having an essay marked!
Wed Jan 10, 2007 12:52 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:shanebrown wrote:I feel like I'm having an essay marked!
If you want people to just say "great job!!" you should indicate that at the beginning of your post.
Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:45 pm
shanebrown wrote:But to the music...Ok. I will be honest, I am in the minority but I don't like Hurt. I can see that it is a good performance but it just does nothing for me personally.
shanebrown wrote:The Last Farewell. Why Elvis recorded this, I have no idea.
shanebrown wrote:For The Heart, like Hurt, is another of those songs I just don't get.
shanebrown wrote:Bitter They Are, the Harder They Fall reminds me of Honky Tonk Angel from promised land and is performed just as well. There is more room here for the vocals to breathe and, despite the rather strange wordless humming(?) by Elvis at the end of some lines, this seems to simply work. Presley is in great voice, reaching the high notes with ease and power without overpowering the delicate nature of the song.
shanebrown wrote:All in all, the album works.
Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:26 pm
shanebrown wrote:dont encourage him ...
Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:25 am
Kuenzer wrote:Trying to live up to his image by doing uptempo songs. Elvis doesn't sound very into it - same as with Fire Down Below.
Thu Jan 11, 2007 1:08 am
shanebrown wrote:your comments on THIS THREAD were perfectly legitimate ones but, if you wish for me to show you the respect that you deserve then I would suggest you treat others on the boards in a similar way.
shanebrown wrote:... someone who treats so many people (whether they be new to the boards or regulars) who are contributing just as interesting posts with derision, contempt and basically as if they are a piece of sh*t.
Thu Jan 11, 2007 1:40 am
shanebrown wrote:I have no intention of issuing an apology.
shanebrown wrote:your posts on the Suspicious Minds thread ... were well out of order ...
Thu Jan 11, 2007 1:55 am
shanebrown wrote:What's more if you want more evidence of your sacasm and attitude, perhaps your comment a few minutes ago on the My Boy thread regarding telling a twenty-three year old to " ask his school chums" over might be a good example.
Fri Jan 12, 2007 5:33 am
Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:59 pm
Sun Jan 14, 2007 12:48 pm
humourless
Sun Jan 14, 2007 12:49 pm
Respect is earned
Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:14 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:shanebrown wrote:What's more if you want more evidence of your sacasm and attitude, perhaps your comment a few minutes ago on the My Boy thread regarding telling a twenty-three year old to " ask his school chums" over might be a good example.
Sorry, try again -- the comment was "tongue-in-cheek," as Cryogenic clearly understood.
Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:48 pm
Cryogenic wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote:shanebrown wrote:What's more if you want more evidence of your sacasm and attitude, perhaps your comment a few minutes ago on the My Boy thread regarding telling a twenty-three year old to " ask his school chums" over might be a good example.
Sorry, try again -- the comment was "tongue-in-cheek," as Cryogenic clearly understood.
Absolutely.
shane: It can sting when The Doc counters your assertions, but he's usually correct, and always witty!
Hosted by ElviCities