Off Topic Messages

Re: Rolling Stone Stoned

Wed Jul 24, 2013 8:23 am

jak wrote:I was reading today about the Boston policeman who risked his job by releasing the photos of the capture.He released the photos due to his anger over the RS cover.I think that speaks volumes.

Amen!

Re: Rolling Stone Stoned

Wed Jul 24, 2013 11:59 pm

bray1977 wrote:
drjohncarpenter wrote:If people are moved to buy the issue based on that cover image, it seems a fairly safe bet they will read the "written word inside the magazine."

Food for thought.


Since many stores are removing it from their shelves in protest at the cover it seems a fairly safe bet that people will not have the opportunity to read it.

Food for thought.


Your plate is empty.

More food for thought: you are mistaken twice-over.

(1) Some stores in the Boston area are removing or not stocking the issue. Obviously, the First Amendment is ... malleable in Massachusetts.

(2) The article is available to anyone at the click of a link:

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev: Jahar's World | Culture News | Rolling Stone
http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/jahars-world-20130717

Read. Learn. Enjoy. ;-)

Re: Rolling Stone Stoned

Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:15 am

:wtf:
Last edited by Lonely Summer on Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Rolling Stone Stoned

Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:02 pm

People act as if this guy went to Rolling Stone and had a photoshoot done. If Charles Manson was on the cover would it make a difference?
IT'S ALL ABOUT $$$$$$$$$ TO SELL A MAGAZINE.

Just as the coffin photo of Elvis Presley was on the cover of the National Enquirer-- once again----> M-O-N-E-Y!