Off Topic Messages

NY Post article on "Song Of The South" & other lost films

Sun Apr 07, 2013 4:32 pm

http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/e ... ertainment

Exclusively on Youtube

The only way to see some long-lost films, including Disney’s controversial ‘Song of the South,’ is to watch them online
By LOU LUMENICK
Last Updated: 6:40 AM, April 7, 2013
Posted: 11:23 PM, April 6, 2013

Disney’s “Song of the South’’ hasn’t been legally available in any form in the US since its last theatrical release in 1986, but you can find it with a few clicks of a (non-Mickey) mouse.

The racially controversial, part-animated 1946 musical that gave the world “Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah’’ has resided in its entirety on YouTube, apparently without protests from the Mouse House’s lawyers, since at least 2008.

Most classic-era movies on YouTube have long been in the public domain, but a much smaller number, like “Song of the South,’’ are still in copyright. Sometimes tangled rights issues block a video release — as is the case with the noir-inflected 1949 version of “The Great Gatsby’’ starring Alan Ladd, which briefly surfaced on TV around 1980 and has never been released by its owner Universal on video.

Alan Ladd and Betty Field in 1949’s “The Great Gatsby,” which has never been released on video.

There are no such legal obstacles with “Song of the South.” Cartoon segments from the film have been available on video from Disney since the 1980s. The studio is much more sensitive, though, about the live-action portions, which even back in the 1940s were criticized by the NAACP for “the impression it gives of an idyllic master-slave relationship” — though the happy, singing Uncle Remus (played by James Baskett, who won a special Oscar for “his able and heart-warming characterization”) is technically a sharecropper after the Civil War.

“I just felt there are elements to the film, while it was a relatively good film, that wouldn’t be in the best interest of our shareholders to bring it back, even though there would be some financial gain,” Disney CEO Robert Iger told shareholders in 2011. “I just don’t feel that it’s right for us to use company resources to make it available.’’

Some of those who have long lobbied for the film’s release believe that Disney, which used to zealously guard the film’s copyright, has quietly decided not to block efforts to distribute it on YouTube or through other channels.

“It’s curious,’’ says Christian Willis, who has exhaustively chronicled the film’s travails at songofthesouth.net for more than a decade. “They were really heavily enforcing [the copyright], and any clips they could find were being quickly pulled down from YouTube.

“People used to be prosecuted for selling bootlegs, but as far as I can tell that hasn’t happened since 2004,” Willis says. “You can find bootleg DVDs [mostly derived from licensed foreign laserdisc releases] on dozens of pages at eBay. Maybe it’s a way for Disney to ease pressure on them from people demanding to see it.”

Jim Korkis, an unofficial Disney historian who recently authored the book “Who’s Afraid of Song of the South?’’ theorizes the studio may be testing the waters for an eventual release by letting it circulate in bootleg form to gauge reaction (which has been mostly positive, though a significant number still regard it as racist).

“Disney has digitally transferred this title, and it could be made available on Blu-ray in the snap of a finger,’’ Korkis says. “But it’s a no-win situation for them. What makes ‘Song of the South’ different than [the racially problematic] ‘Birth of a Nation’ or ‘Gone With the Wind’ is that it’s primarily a children’s movie, and providing any amount of historical context isn’t going to help.’’

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BtjW7PW2z0

Meanwhile, even the upcoming release of a new version of “The Great Gatsby’’ starring Leonardo DiCaprio hasn’t spurred a home video release for the 1949 edition with Ladd, which has been sitting unchallenged on YouTube for at least the past couple of years.

Apparently the film’s owner, Universal Pictures, hasn’t been able to able to come to terms with F. Scott Fitzgerald’s heirs to renew the underlying literary rights to this film, which was acclaimed during a rare theatrical showing at the Noir City Film Festival last year in Los Angeles.

Another much sought-after title by classic-film fans, “Christmas Holiday’’ (1944), was uploaded to YouTube in December 2008.

Never shown on US TV, much less released on video here by Universal, this musical noir stars hugely popular singer-actress Deanna Durbin as a thinly disguised prostitute in New Orleans who has problems with her homicidal estranged husband (Gene Kelly).

The film’s credits are blue-chip — directed by esteemed noir master Robert Siodmak (“The Killers’’) from a script that Oscar winner Herman J. Mankiewicz (“Citizen Kane’’) adapted from a novel by Somerset Maugham (“The Letter’’).

Literary rights are likely the culprit — same as for “Once in a Lifetime’’ (1932). A hilarious version of a Broadway play by George S. Kaufman and Moss Hart whose portrayal of Hollywood’s panic at the coming of sound anticipates “Singin’ in the Rain,’’ it hasn’t been officially seen since its only TV airing on PBS in 1971. But you can find this gem on YouTube in its entirety.

Re: NY Post article on "Song Of The South" & other lost film

Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:30 pm

The New York Post really should get some info on a subject before they start writing about it. Firstly, none of the films listed above are "lost" or anything remotely resembling being "lost". "Lost films" simply don't exist any more, whereas these ones are caught up in some form of legal wrangles - possibly. Christmas Holiday has been available outside of America for years, and Song of the South had a video release outside of America. Therefore if film collectors in America really were seeking the films that much, they would get hold of those issues - and would probably already own the equipment to play them on. There are a vast amount of film classics that have never seen the light of day on DVD on either side of the Atlantic, so it seems odd that the article seemingly picks titles out of thin air (as it does with Christmas Holida and the even more obscure Once in a Lifetime) and not mention what are thought to be the three most requested movies not yet on DVD - Porgy and Bess, Show Boat and The Uninvited (the latter finally appeared in the UK last year, but no release in America yet).

It does seem, however,that studios are turning a blind eye to ebay bootlegs of films they never intend to release themselves - particularly silent films and early talkies that don't survive in prints of high enough quality to be released by the major studios. This has to be a good thing. I would never sugegst that bootleggers should issue films that would be issued eventually on the various Archive ranges, but films that never will be are finally getting available once again to those who care about them.

Re: NY Post article on "Song Of The South" & other lost film

Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:01 pm

Now Disney's going after bootleg copies of "Song Of The South":

http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/movies/di ... z2R6eYDHjb

Back on April 7, I wrote that the normally litigious Disney has apparently been ignoring copies of the controversial "Song of the South'' (1949) uploaded to YouTube since at least 2008. Now the Mouse House appears to have begun a crackdown on bootlegs of the film, which has never been legally available on video in the United States and hasn't been shown theatrically here since its 1986 reissue. A 2011 upload containing the entire movie in a single file -- formerly embedded in my article -- has been blocked by YouTube on copyright grounds at Disney's request. And most of the 2008 upload, in 10 parts, has also been blocked. But there are multiple versions of what appears to be the entire film still available to watch on YouTube as of this morning.

Amazon has removed all but one listing for bootlegs DVDs of "Song of the South'' -- derived like the YouTube uploads mostly from authorized Asian video releases -- from resellers. But a Google search still yields ads for three websites selling bootleg DVDs directly. It's anyone's guess exactly when Disney's lawyers started sending out cease and desist letters, and how aggressively this will be pursued.

By the way, the other four movies I listed in the April 7 piece -- "The Great Gatsby'' (1949), "Christmas Holiday'' (1944) and "Once in a Lifetime,'' all owned by Universal but not available on video in this country because of rights issues -- were still available for watching at YouTube as of this morning. Stay tuned.

Re: NY Post article on "Song Of The South" & other lost film

Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:51 pm

elvis4life wrote:Now Disney's going after bootleg copies of "Song Of The South":

http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/movies/di ... z2R6eYDHjb

Back on April 7, I wrote that the normally litigious Disney has apparently been ignoring copies of the controversial "Song of the South'' (1949) uploaded to YouTube since at least 2008. Now the Mouse House appears to have begun a crackdown on bootlegs of the film, which has never been legally available on video in the United States and hasn't been shown theatrically here since its 1986 reissue. A 2011 upload containing the entire movie in a single file -- formerly embedded in my article -- has been blocked by YouTube on copyright grounds at Disney's request. And most of the 2008 upload, in 10 parts, has also been blocked. But there are multiple versions of what appears to be the entire film still available to watch on YouTube as of this morning.

Amazon has removed all but one listing for bootlegs DVDs of "Song of the South'' -- derived like the YouTube uploads mostly from authorized Asian video releases -- from resellers. But a Google search still yields ads for three websites selling bootleg DVDs directly. It's anyone's guess exactly when Disney's lawyers started sending out cease and desist letters, and how aggressively this will be pursued.

By the way, the other four movies I listed in the April 7 piece -- "The Great Gatsby'' (1949), "Christmas Holiday'' (1944) and "Once in a Lifetime,'' all owned by Universal but not available on video in this country because of rights issues -- were still available for watching at YouTube as of this morning. Stay tuned.


What we don't know is whether Disney were already taking down videos of SOTS on youtube PRIOR to the first article. The likelihood is that, like most copyrighted video footage, the amount of time it lasts on youtube before being taken down is quite small, and that these actions were taking place long before the article was written.