Sun Jan 06, 2013 6:39 pm
Sun Jan 06, 2013 7:58 pm


Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:13 pm
Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:41 pm
ChrisM wrote:Are threads about bunnies against the rules? Just wandering. I don't want to waste my time contributing information or asking questions about bunnies if it is just going to get deleted without reason or explanation.
If someone has the common courtesy to explain if bunnies (or any other topics) are against what appear to be the unwritten rules of this Forum, then I promise to refrain from any more bunny threads.
Chris
Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:42 pm
Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:45 pm
promiseland wrote:Instead of littering the forum with such sarcastic questions once again, as a courtesy why don't you PM Moderator1 or Moderator2 and ask.
Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:59 pm
ChrisM wrote:How about chocolate (excluding chocolate bunnies, obviously, as we have already established). Would a thread about chocolate get deleted without warning?
Sun Jan 06, 2013 9:56 pm
The Pirate wrote:ChrisM wrote:How about chocolate (excluding chocolate bunnies, obviously, as we have already established). Would a thread about chocolate get deleted without warning?
Depends on what you intend to use the chocolate for. Of course, if you really want to make sure that your posts don't get deleted, you could just head over to the "Alizee" thread and join the sad buggers there by attaching pictures of semi naked women to your comments. You could maybe spend the next few weeks pretending that you had a girlfriend, only to reveal at a later date that she was in fact somebody who used to live next door, and who is now a struggling actress who has appeared in a few films nobody has ever heard of.
Just a few pointers there to keep you going. Good luck.
Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:07 pm
poormadpeter wrote:Bearing that thread of semi-naked women in mind, do you think i'd get away with one of semi-naked men?
Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:10 pm
Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:58 pm
poormadpeter wrote:The Pirate wrote:ChrisM wrote:How about chocolate (excluding chocolate bunnies, obviously, as we have already established). Would a thread about chocolate get deleted without warning?
Depends on what you intend to use the chocolate for. Of course, if you really want to make sure that your posts don't get deleted, you could just head over to the "Alizee" thread and join the sad buggers there by attaching pictures of semi naked women to your comments. You could maybe spend the next few weeks pretending that you had a girlfriend, only to reveal at a later date that she was in fact somebody who used to live next door, and who is now a struggling actress who has appeared in a few films nobody has ever heard of.
Just a few pointers there to keep you going. Good luck.
Bearing that thread of semi-naked women in mind, do you think i'd get away with one of semi-naked men?
Mon Jan 07, 2013 12:25 am
poormadpeter wrote:The Pirate wrote:ChrisM wrote:How about chocolate (excluding chocolate bunnies, obviously, as we have already established). Would a thread about chocolate get deleted without warning?
Depends on what you intend to use the chocolate for. Of course, if you really want to make sure that your posts don't get deleted, you could just head over to the "Alizee" thread and join the sad buggers there by attaching pictures of semi naked women to your comments. You could maybe spend the next few weeks pretending that you had a girlfriend, only to reveal at a later date that she was in fact somebody who used to live next door, and who is now a struggling actress who has appeared in a few films nobody has ever heard of.
Just a few pointers there to keep you going. Good luck.
Bearing that thread of semi-naked women in mind, do you think i'd get away with one of semi-naked men?
Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:11 am
The Pirate wrote:ChrisM wrote:How about chocolate (excluding chocolate bunnies, obviously, as we have already established). Would a thread about chocolate get deleted without warning?
Depends on what you intend to use the chocolate for. Of course, if you really want to make sure that your posts don't get deleted, you could just head over to the "Alizee" thread and join the sad buggers there by attaching pictures of semi naked women to your comments. You could maybe spend the next few weeks pretending that you had a girlfriend, only to reveal at a later date that she was in fact somebody who used to live next door, and who is now a struggling actress who has appeared in a few films nobody has ever heard of.
Just a few pointers there to keep you going. Good luck.
Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:30 am
ChrisM wrote:Are threads about bunnies against the rules? Just wandering. I don't want to waste my time contributing information or asking questions about bunnies if it is just going to get deleted without reason or explanation.
If someone has the common courtesy to explain if bunnies (or any other topics) are against what appear to be the unwritten rules of this Forum, then I promise to refrain from any more bunny threads.
Chris
Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:32 am
The Pirate wrote:...you could just head over to the "Alizee" thread and join the sad buggers there by attaching pictures of semi naked women to your comments...
Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:56 am
Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:24 am
promiseland wrote:poormadpeter wrote:The Pirate wrote:ChrisM wrote:How about chocolate (excluding chocolate bunnies, obviously, as we have already established). Would a thread about chocolate get deleted without warning?
Depends on what you intend to use the chocolate for. Of course, if you really want to make sure that your posts don't get deleted, you could just head over to the "Alizee" thread and join the sad buggers there by attaching pictures of semi naked women to your comments. You could maybe spend the next few weeks pretending that you had a girlfriend, only to reveal at a later date that she was in fact somebody who used to live next door, and who is now a struggling actress who has appeared in a few films nobody has ever heard of.
Just a few pointers there to keep you going. Good luck.
Bearing that thread of semi-naked women in mind, do you think i'd get away with one of semi-naked men?
Does every topic you read have to be an excuse to exploit and advertise your sexuality here at FECC? You try to make it as if Colin has created a topic for lesbians. Please stop peter it's really getting old now.
Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:34 am
poormadpeter wrote:A little more additional information on those cinematic masterpieces!
2004 Barbershop 2: Back in Business Gina's Niece Credited as Lauren Keyana Palmer . BIT PART
2004 The Wool Cap Lou TV movie;Main role TV MOVIE SHOULD BE UNDER THE TV SECTION!
2005 Knights of the South Bronx Kenya Russell TV movie TV MOVIE SHOULD BE UNDER THE TV SECTION!
2006 Akeelah and the Bee Akeelah Anderson Lead role
2006 Madea's Family Reunion Nikki Grady Supporting role
2007 Cleaner Rose Cutler Supporting role LOST $15 MILLION AT THE BOX OFFICE
2007 Jump In! Mary Thomas TV movie; Main role TV MOVIE SHOULD BE UNDER THE TV SECTION!
2008 The Longshots Jasmine Plummer Main role [b]LOST APPROXIMATELY $10MILLION AT THE BOX OFFICE[/b]
2008 Unstable Fables: Tortoise vs. Hare Crystal Tortoise Voice STRAIGHT TO VIDEO RELEASE
2009 Shrink Jemma Supporting role GROSS WAS JUST $189,000 (NOT PROFIT, JUST $189,000!) AT THE USA BOX OFFICE, AND ONLY £409 (NO, I DIDN'T MISS ANY ZEROS OFF THAT NUMBER) AT THE UK BOX OFFICE
2012 Joyful Noise[20] Olivia Hill Main role
2012 Winx Club: The Secret of the Lost Kingdom Aisha Voice; Main role TV MOVIE SHOULD BE UNDER THE TV SECTION!
2012 Ice Age: Continental Drift Peaches Voice; Supporting role I THINK 21ST BILLED COUNTS AS BIT PART NOT SUPPORTING ROLE!
2012 Rags Kadee Worth TV movie; Lead role, Producer TV MOVIE SHOULD BE UNDER THE TV SECTION!
2012 Abducted: The Carlina White Story Carlina White TV movie; Lead role TV MOVIE SHOULD BE UNDER THE TV SECTION!
2013 Virgin Mary[11] Mary Main role
There, that's a more detailed picture of this lovely lady's cinematic efforts.
Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:48 am
promiseland wrote:poormadpeter wrote:A little more additional information on those cinematic masterpieces!
2004 Barbershop 2: Back in Business Gina's Niece Credited as Lauren Keyana Palmer . BIT PART
2004 The Wool Cap Lou TV movie;Main role TV MOVIE SHOULD BE UNDER THE TV SECTION!
2005 Knights of the South Bronx Kenya Russell TV movie TV MOVIE SHOULD BE UNDER THE TV SECTION!
2006 Akeelah and the Bee Akeelah Anderson Lead role
2006 Madea's Family Reunion Nikki Grady Supporting role
2007 Cleaner Rose Cutler Supporting role LOST $15 MILLION AT THE BOX OFFICE
2007 Jump In! Mary Thomas TV movie; Main role TV MOVIE SHOULD BE UNDER THE TV SECTION!
2008 The Longshots Jasmine Plummer Main role [b]LOST APPROXIMATELY $10MILLION AT THE BOX OFFICE[/b]
2008 Unstable Fables: Tortoise vs. Hare Crystal Tortoise Voice STRAIGHT TO VIDEO RELEASE
2009 Shrink Jemma Supporting role GROSS WAS JUST $189,000 (NOT PROFIT, JUST $189,000!) AT THE USA BOX OFFICE, AND ONLY £409 (NO, I DIDN'T MISS ANY ZEROS OFF THAT NUMBER) AT THE UK BOX OFFICE
2012 Joyful Noise[20] Olivia Hill Main role
2012 Winx Club: The Secret of the Lost Kingdom Aisha Voice; Main role TV MOVIE SHOULD BE UNDER THE TV SECTION!
2012 Ice Age: Continental Drift Peaches Voice; Supporting role I THINK 21ST BILLED COUNTS AS BIT PART NOT SUPPORTING ROLE!
2012 Rags Kadee Worth TV movie; Lead role, Producer TV MOVIE SHOULD BE UNDER THE TV SECTION!
2012 Abducted: The Carlina White Story Carlina White TV movie; Lead role TV MOVIE SHOULD BE UNDER THE TV SECTION!
2013 Virgin Mary[11] Mary Main role
There, that's a more detailed picture of this lovely lady's cinematic efforts.
Wow what an effort to degrade an actresses child career, boy you really are something poormadpeter !
Just to let you know her fist CD flopped But there will be a new this summer for you to analyze.
From 2004 at age 11 till now less than 10years as an African American child Actress, these are some accomplishments!
Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:18 am
Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:00 am
Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:20 am
TJ wrote:Not sure why there would be an issue with promiseland drawing attention to his friend. She might not be a huge star, but she's doing just fine when you consider how many in her profession struggle to get any work.
Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:57 am
Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:21 am
Jove wrote:If he is obsessed with Elvis, I don't see why he can't be "obsessed" with her.
Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:54 am
ChrisM wrote:Are threads about bunnies against the rules? Just wandering. I don't want to waste my time contributing information or asking questions about bunnies if it is just going to get deleted without reason or explanation.
If someone has the common courtesy to explain if bunnies (or any other topics) are against what appear to be the unwritten rules of this Forum, then I promise to refrain from any more bunny threads.
Chris
Hosted by ElviCities