Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:18 pm
Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:25 pm
Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:07 am
Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:36 am
Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:37 am
Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:48 am
Robt wrote:Thanks Pete. Until you posted his Blue Xmas video I never even heard of him. He's good!
Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:59 am
Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:30 am
Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:49 am
poormadpeter wrote:If you are mad enough to do your Christmas shopping on the high street rather than via the internet, you will be bombarded with Christmas music through speakers everywhere. But over the last couple of years, an extra voice has been added to those seemingly played on repeat in each shop. Alongside Elvis, Dean Martin, Frank Sinatra, Nat King Cole, Bing Crosby, Perry Como and Andy Williams...is Michael Buble.
I admit that when I first heard Buble, he bored me. Sure, he had a nice voice and a cute smile, but the arrangements were literally the same ones that Sinatra, Darin and others had used decades before. Slowly but surely that changed, and Crazy Love was a marked improvement over his previous efforts. The arrangements were novel and/or exciting - and the intro to his version of Cry Me A River has been used so often that it is now instantly recognisable. What's more, the vocals were more self-assured with a move away from pure swing to a style that often attempts to add rockier elements into the mix as well.
Harry Connick Jr must have been seething. When Connick was sleep-walking his way through a couple of dull albums of easy listening standards, Buble came along and stole the act he had a decade earlier - taking old standards and rethinking them in often slightly-left field arrangements.
Buble's Christmas album is considerably more successful than any of Connick's three attempts at seasonal LPs - his first one caused my entire household to rename him Harry Chronic for a number of years, it was so bad. What has made Buble's become what appears to be an instant Yueltide classic is that it does just enough to make the songs Buble's without taking away the original intent of the material. It is, basically, a 1950s Christmas album made in 2011. The material is, for the most part, traditional fare and the opening It's Beginning to Look A Lot Like Christmas sets the scene well with its lush orchestration.
The album stands out when compared to recent yueltide offerings that should have hit the mark with their intended audiences - with Bieber's Christmas album released at the same time seeming remarkably vapid - simply because it harks back to the albums that we all have grown up with and pays tribute to them. White Christmas is based on the Drifters version (that Presley was inspired by) but then includes a hard-swinging instrumental section. Blue Christmas is the highlight and is transformed into a brilliant New Orleans jazz-styled romp that is an absolute blast - ironically Connick had used a similar arrangement for Cry Me A River on his Come By Me album a decade or so earlier. As with other Buble albums, he is better when handling swing material, with the pop-style material being rather forgettable in his hands. But, luckily, there are only a couple of these tracks on the album.
It seems ironic that, despite the majority of these arrangements being newly written for the album, Buble has never sounded more like Sinatra - particularly in tracks like It's Beginning to Look A Lot Like Christmas and I'll Be Home For Christmas, although Sinatra never did anything like the arrangement of Blue Christmas here. Buble can be more difficult to watch, with it sometimes being very awkward to ascertain whether he is being sincere, taking the p*ss or tipsy. He seems at his most sincere here, and the album is a deserved success.
The album is extremely good, the arrangements often stunning, the material traditional and the vocals sincere. Such a shame, then, that commercialism over-rides all of this with the album being re-released in a deluxe edition with a couple of extra tracks in an attempt to get people to buy the thing twice.
Ah, the sound of cash-tills. Now, that's one of the real sounds of Christmas.
Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:10 am
Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:25 am
Thu May 02, 2013 3:52 am
Fri May 03, 2013 5:01 pm
episthebest wrote:His music is nice, but he uses a lot of autotune that he doesn't need.
Fri May 03, 2013 5:32 pm
The Pirate wrote:
This is a live version of the same song, and you can really tell the difference.
Fri May 03, 2013 6:22 pm
Bodie wrote:The Pirate wrote:
This is a live version of the same song, and you can really tell the difference.
This performance from the Graham Norton Show a few weeks ago was not good at all.
He seemed to have a problem with his earpiece and wasn't comfortable.
Buble is a tremendous talent with a great voice.
Im seeing him this year at the O2 arena in London.
Fri May 03, 2013 6:46 pm
poormadpeter wrote:Bodie wrote:The Pirate wrote:
This is a live version of the same song, and you can really tell the difference.
This performance from the Graham Norton Show a few weeks ago was not good at all.
He seemed to have a problem with his earpiece and wasn't comfortable.
Buble is a tremendous talent with a great voice.
Im seeing him this year at the O2 arena in London.
Yes, agreed regarding the performance on Norton - but good for him for not being worried about it and just getting on with it rather than redoing it etc, which I'm sure is what most would have done. That said, he seemed very relaxed on Norton throughout the show!
Fri May 03, 2013 6:53 pm
Fri May 03, 2013 9:25 pm
Fri May 03, 2013 10:11 pm
Hosted by ElviCities