Moderators: Moderator1, Moderator2



Rob wrote:I will participate in "Best" threads, but I no longer do "Weakest, Worst, Suckiest," or anything of the sort.
Thanks.




ElvisTheKid wrote:Here is my take....
These film songs were built to fit a movie and the movies they were built to fit are more or less comedies. I don't take these songs to heart. They have absolutely nothing to do with Elvis' talent. He didn't write them, he didn't sing them bad, and he wasn't out promoting them live (The point was to go to the movies to hear Elvis sing). None of this was his doing. He was a puppet on a string. A very rich puppet on a string.
Back then was a little different then today. Bands go years between albums. Aerosmith hasn't had a studio album out in 5 years. While the Beatles came in and did their thing, Elvis took a back seat and made some 60's style comedies for 5 years ('63 to '67 was when the formula was in full force. '65 '66 '67 being the worst). People don't realize that some of his most beautiful Gospel work came out in '66 during the heart of this supposed "declined period"
I personally don't think his movies are as horrible as everyone says either. His early 60's movies were decent, the few towards the end weren't all that bad, and there were also some decent ones in the middle. I still watch them all the time. I like Elvis' swave character in each film. He's consistently cool and consistently Elvis. If you take away the 10 worst films, I wonder if he would still have had a bad movies rap. Don't matter to me because I like them all.
I get so mad when people mock him for his movies because it's not a true reflection on his talent. Both Acting and Singing. He was making "Hip" films, not "Hit" films.
Getting back to these worst songs. The topic should be “Elvis' 5 Weakest Movie Title Songs That Were Written For Him”
r&b wrote:ElvisTheKid wrote:Here is my take....
These film songs were built to fit a movie and the movies they were built to fit are more or less comedies. I don't take these songs to heart. They have absolutely nothing to do with Elvis' talent. He didn't write them, he didn't sing them bad, and he wasn't out promoting them live (The point was to go to the movies to hear Elvis sing). None of this was his doing. He was a puppet on a string. A very rich puppet on a string.
Back then was a little different then today. Bands go years between albums. Aerosmith hasn't had a studio album out in 5 years. While the Beatles came in and did their thing, Elvis took a back seat and made some 60's style comedies for 5 years ('63 to '67 was when the formula was in full force. '65 '66 '67 being the worst). People don't realize that some of his most beautiful Gospel work came out in '66 during the heart of this supposed "declined period"
I personally don't think his movies are as horrible as everyone says either. His early 60's movies were decent, the few towards the end weren't all that bad, and there were also some decent ones in the middle. I still watch them all the time. I like Elvis' swave character in each film. He's consistently cool and consistently Elvis. If you take away the 10 worst films, I wonder if he would still have had a bad movies rap. Don't matter to me because I like them all.
I get so mad when people mock him for his movies because it's not a true reflection on his talent. Both Acting and Singing. He was making "Hip" films, not "Hit" films.
Getting back to these worst songs. The topic should be “Elvis' 5 Weakest Movie Title Songs That Were Written For Him”
?? - All songs good and bad were written for him. He didnt write. You made too much out of the topic. Its just a ranking, dont read more into it on how times were different, etc. He sang what he sang, good and bad.
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot], davide, Google [Bot], grelvis06, JohanD, L Ray, LesterB, Ludde70, Mike C, R2-D2, Rich_TCB and 18 guests