Sat Jan 05, 2013 2:59 pm
Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:17 pm
Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:31 pm
TJ wrote:All the comments on the site are predictably negative, accusing them of crimes against music etc.
They are a pop band for young girls, just like many who have gone before and many who will follow them. Totally harmless.
Sat Jan 05, 2013 5:29 pm
Sat Jan 05, 2013 5:31 pm
Sat Jan 05, 2013 7:04 pm
Sat Jan 05, 2013 7:21 pm
rlj4ep wrote:A real credit to Elvis that his work is still being used by newer performers.
One Direction is really a good group. I took my daughters to a concert they gave back in May. I must admit, they are good and despite their ages, they were entertaining.
rlj
Sat Jan 05, 2013 8:22 pm
Tony.. wrote:rlj4ep wrote:A real credit to Elvis that his work is still being used by newer performers.
One Direction is really a good group. I took my daughters to a concert they gave back in May. I must admit, they are good and despite their ages, they were entertaining.
rlj
Is this the group of top musicians where one of them appears to have a dead squirrel on his head?!
Sat Jan 05, 2013 8:34 pm
Sat Jan 05, 2013 9:00 pm
poormadpeter wrote:One comments says:
"To do this to him is offensive to his importance and memory.Shame on One Direction and whoever thought of this idea to (badly) recreate an iconic music scene.I'm an Elvis fan and this ticks me off, to see this awful industry created "group" try to pick on the bones of Elvis Presley.Elvis was an original. The King Of Rock and Roll.......One Direction is a part of the PROBLEM."
Quite what problem they are a part of I'm really not sure. They seem nice guys to me, completely harmless and quite rightfully having a ball with their fame and fortune. I also dont remember such things being written when Robbie Williams did a similar thing with the opening of the 68 comeback special on his own TV special back in 2002 or 2003. Part of the backlash is as much against Simon Cowell as it is against One Direction, but as I have said in other threads there are many well-known entertainers and singers who started their career on a radio or TV talent show. And, frankly, who cares how they get started providing they do what they do so well. The comments on the Sun website also basically go to show that there are a large number of venomous, hate-filled idiots trawling the web. There is also the irony that the "Elvis fan" clearly missed which is that he is spewing the same ridiculous vitriol as that which was made at Elvis when he first came on the scene.
The issue with groups such as One Direction and singers such as Justin Bieber is that it is seen to be the right thing to do to jump on them, suggest they have no talent whatsoever, will never last, blah blah blah. Whether they last or not is something we will not know as yet - although, to be fair, the average life of a group is normally smaller than that of an individual. However, I would certainly urge their detractors who claim that One Direction and others have no talent to get up on stage and put on the kind of show that such artists put on, and to sing the harmonies etc that such artists sing, and to play the variety of instruments that they play. The same "they won't last" comments were made ten years ago about McFly and twenty-three years ago about Take That, and yet both are still with us and going strong. Just because a group is not aimed at us - or is put together in a way some don't approve of - doesn't mean they should be ridiculed or put down in some form of strange fits of jealousy. If they had no talent they certainly wouldn't have become the sensation that they have across the globe. They may well land up suffering from over-exposure on our TV screens as they seemed to be everywhere during the autumn and, while their music is certainly not aimed at me, I've only ever seen them giving a bad performance once on a TV show (the X-Factor final in December) and confess that I found the ballad they brought out in the autumn to be really quite delightful.
Sat Jan 05, 2013 9:56 pm
poormadpeter wrote:One comments says:
"To do this to him is offensive to his importance and memory.Shame on One Direction and whoever thought of this idea to (badly) recreate an iconic music scene.I'm an Elvis fan and this ticks me off, to see this awful industry created "group" try to pick on the bones of Elvis Presley.Elvis was an original. The King Of Rock and Roll.......One Direction is a part of the PROBLEM."
Quite what problem they are a part of I'm really not sure. They seem nice guys to me, completely harmless and quite rightfully having a ball with their fame and fortune. I also dont remember such things being written when Robbie Williams did a similar thing with the opening of the 68 comeback special on his own TV special back in 2002 or 2003. Part of the backlash is as much against Simon Cowell as it is against One Direction, but as I have said in other threads there are many well-known entertainers and singers who started their career on a radio or TV talent show. And, frankly, who cares how they get started providing they do what they do so well. The comments on the Sun website also basically go to show that there are a large number of venomous, hate-filled idiots trawling the web. There is also the irony that the "Elvis fan" clearly missed which is that he is spewing the same ridiculous vitriol as that which was made at Elvis when he first came on the scene.
The issue with groups such as One Direction and singers such as Justin Bieber is that it is seen to be the right thing to do to jump on them, suggest they have no talent whatsoever, will never last, blah blah blah. Whether they last or not is something we will not know as yet - although, to be fair, the average life of a group is normally smaller than that of an individual. However, I would certainly urge their detractors who claim that One Direction and others have no talent to get up on stage and put on the kind of show that such artists put on, and to sing the harmonies etc that such artists sing, and to play the variety of instruments that they play. The same "they won't last" comments were made ten years ago about McFly and twenty-three years ago about Take That, and yet both are still with us and going strong. Just because a group is not aimed at us - or is put together in a way some don't approve of - doesn't mean they should be ridiculed or put down in some form of strange fits of jealousy. If they had no talent they certainly wouldn't have become the sensation that they have across the globe. They may well land up suffering from over-exposure on our TV screens as they seemed to be everywhere during the autumn and, while their music is certainly not aimed at me, I've only ever seen them giving a bad performance once on a TV show (the X-Factor final in December) and confess that I found the ballad they brought out in the autumn to be really quite delightful.
Sat Jan 05, 2013 9:59 pm
promiseland wrote:poormadpeter wrote:One comments says:
"To do this to him is offensive to his importance and memory.Shame on One Direction and whoever thought of this idea to (badly) recreate an iconic music scene.I'm an Elvis fan and this ticks me off, to see this awful industry created "group" try to pick on the bones of Elvis Presley.Elvis was an original. The King Of Rock and Roll.......One Direction is a part of the PROBLEM."
Quite what problem they are a part of I'm really not sure. They seem nice guys to me, completely harmless and quite rightfully having a ball with their fame and fortune. I also dont remember such things being written when Robbie Williams did a similar thing with the opening of the 68 comeback special on his own TV special back in 2002 or 2003. Part of the backlash is as much against Simon Cowell as it is against One Direction, but as I have said in other threads there are many well-known entertainers and singers who started their career on a radio or TV talent show. And, frankly, who cares how they get started providing they do what they do so well. The comments on the Sun website also basically go to show that there are a large number of venomous, hate-filled idiots trawling the web. There is also the irony that the "Elvis fan" clearly missed which is that he is spewing the same ridiculous vitriol as that which was made at Elvis when he first came on the scene.
The issue with groups such as One Direction and singers such as Justin Bieber is that it is seen to be the right thing to do to jump on them, suggest they have no talent whatsoever, will never last, blah blah blah. Whether they last or not is something we will not know as yet - although, to be fair, the average life of a group is normally smaller than that of an individual. However, I would certainly urge their detractors who claim that One Direction and others have no talent to get up on stage and put on the kind of show that such artists put on, and to sing the harmonies etc that such artists sing, and to play the variety of instruments that they play. The same "they won't last" comments were made ten years ago about McFly and twenty-three years ago about Take That, and yet both are still with us and going strong. Just because a group is not aimed at us - or is put together in a way some don't approve of - doesn't mean they should be ridiculed or put down in some form of strange fits of jealousy. If they had no talent they certainly wouldn't have become the sensation that they have across the globe. They may well land up suffering from over-exposure on our TV screens as they seemed to be everywhere during the autumn and, while their music is certainly not aimed at me, I've only ever seen them giving a bad performance once on a TV show (the X-Factor final in December) and confess that I found the ballad they brought out in the autumn to be really quite delightful.
This comment on the Sun page is yet another example of the fanatical, lost in an "Elvis shell" type fan that thinks any little change or forward movement to the music of Elvis Presley is the ultimate artistic blaspheme to his legacy. They even hate the Compact Disc or anything that wasn't used during Elvis' lifetime. These are the type of fans who shouldn't even have Internet access if that's the case, since Elvis didn't have it either.
I just try to ignore their idiocy and let then live in their lost in the 50's, 8-track- LP mental content lives.
Sun Jan 06, 2013 12:08 am
Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:30 am
ElvisTheKid wrote:The only difference is, Elvis looked cool doing it and they look like a bunch a school girls.
But unfortunately it has to result to that in order to help the Elvis legacy going. The only problem is, they are a British boy band. I think there is a more fitting band out there. They have the sailor suits on in the end of that thing. Maybe a Yellow Submarine would be more fitting?
Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:38 am
poormadpeter wrote:To youngsters today, no doubt 1D also look cool doing it. Times change and popular culture cannot and should not be stuck in the 1950s. The young have every right to their music and the artists involved.
Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:45 am
poormadpeter wrote:ElvisTheKid wrote:To youngsters today, no doubt 1D also look cool doing it. Times change and popular culture cannot and should not be stuck in the 1950s. The young have every right to their music and the artists involved.
Sun Jan 06, 2013 4:38 am
Jove wrote:More than 55 years later, Elvis famous spiral staircase and plummeting down a fire station pole is still inspiring the acts of today.
Sun Jan 06, 2013 4:53 am
Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:04 am
Elvisgirl wrote:I don't like when other people imitates Elvis
Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:13 am
Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:31 am
Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:58 am
ChrisM wrote:Jove wrote:More than 55 years later, Elvis famous spiral staircase and plummeting down a fire station pole is still inspiring the acts of today.
Why would there be a fire station pole in a jailhouse?
Chris
Sun Jan 06, 2013 6:15 am
Jove wrote: The same reason why there is a saxophone and a slide trombone and the guards singing along in a jailhouse.
Sun Jan 06, 2013 6:18 pm
poormadpeter wrote:ElvisTheKid wrote:The only difference is, Elvis looked cool doing it and they look like a bunch a school girls.
But unfortunately it has to result to that in order to help the Elvis legacy going. The only problem is, they are a British boy band. I think there is a more fitting band out there. They have the sailor suits on in the end of that thing. Maybe a Yellow Submarine would be more fitting?
To youngsters today, no doubt 1D also look cool doing it. Times change and popular culture cannot and should not be stuck in the 1950s. The young have every right to their music and the artists involved.
Sun Jan 06, 2013 7:25 pm
Tony.. wrote:poormadpeter wrote:ElvisTheKid wrote:The only difference is, Elvis looked cool doing it and they look like a bunch a school girls.
But unfortunately it has to result to that in order to help the Elvis legacy going. The only problem is, they are a British boy band. I think there is a more fitting band out there. They have the sailor suits on in the end of that thing. Maybe a Yellow Submarine would be more fitting?
To youngsters today, no doubt 1D also look cool doing it. Times change and popular culture cannot and should not be stuck in the 1950s. The young have every right to their music and the artists involved.
But, in my opinion, no one should be allowed to have a recording contract if they mime on stage, can't play any instrument, have no obvious talent or were voted for on a cheaply produced karaoke TV show.
Hosted by ElviCities