Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:22 am
Rob wrote:poormadpeter wrote:Are you happy about buying a CD mastered at the wrong speed, Rob?
I never really gave it much thought, Pete.
I get these recordings because I get enjoyment out of Elvis Presley. If I happen to obtain an audience recording that is of bad quality, or a soundboard show that is the same, or even a rehearsal that is the wrong speed, I'm not particularly fond of it, no. However, I also know that much of this material was never meant to be heard by a hardcore Elvis fan / CD collector like me anyway. That alone makes me glad to hear it anyway that I can. As a fan at the level that I am, I would much rather hear this mastered a little too slow than to never hear it at all. I do not dissect these releases like so many others here do. I appreciate having had the chance to hear them. I am fortunate enough that I don't have to come close to picking and choosing various CD releases, so maybe that's where I don't agree when others complain. However, I am as much of a fan here as anyone and I remember 30+ years ago when I would have pushed an old lady in a wheelchair in front of a freight train to get this same material that is so easily accessible now. I enjoy what I can get and never take it for granted. Many here do not know what it was like in those days and are spoiled because FTD soundboards and great sounding boot CDs are all they've ever known. I'm from the old school and never take any of this material for granted. It makes me shake my head to hear all of this moaning about 5% too slow, this mix sucks, etc. Man, just enjoy the releases because someday it will all be over.
I really pity some on here who cannot just sit back and enjoy the recordings the way I do. They are really missing out on some great material. Damn the 5% too slow BS. You were never meant to hear it anyway.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:29 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:30 am
Rob wrote:poormadpeter wrote:Are you happy about buying a CD mastered at the wrong speed, Rob?
I never really gave it much thought, Pete.
I get these recordings because I get enjoyment out of Elvis Presley. If I happen to obtain an audience recording that is of bad quality, or a soundboard show that is the same, or even a rehearsal that is the wrong speed, I'm not particularly fond of it, no. However, I also know that much of this material was never meant to be heard by a hardcore Elvis fan / CD collector like me anyway. That alone makes me glad to hear it anyway that I can. As a fan at the level that I am, I would much rather hear this mastered a little too slow than to never hear it at all. I do not dissect these releases like so many others here do. I appreciate having had the chance to hear them. I am fortunate enough that I don't have to come close to picking and choosing various CD releases, so maybe that's where I don't agree when others complain. However, I am as much of a fan here as anyone and I remember 30+ years ago when I would have pushed an old lady in a wheelchair in front of a freight train to get this same material that is so easily accessible now. I enjoy what I can get and never take it for granted. Many here do not know what it was like in those days and are spoiled because FTD soundboards and great sounding boot CDs are all they've ever known. I'm from the old school and never take any of this material for granted. It makes me shake my head to hear all of this moaning about 5% too slow, this mix sucks, etc. Man, just enjoy the releases because someday it will all be over.
I really pity some on here who cannot just sit back and enjoy the recordings the way I do. They are really missing out on some great material. Damn the 5% too slow BS. You were never meant to hear it anyway.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:48 am
Matthew wrote:The collector base needs to care about production quality - if there are only low standards of expectation from the fans, then low production values is what we will receive.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:20 am
paulsweeney wrote:We do care about production quality. You imply that there are low standards of expectation from the fans, and as a result we get low production values. You are dead wrong Matthew.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:36 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:06 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:23 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:28 am
dannyboy1 wrote:Did you notice that regarding the PFAP release they said they had to speed up the film to match the sound? If they had instead slowed the sound to match the film then that release would have been well worth its money. Instead we get both at the wrong speed. Very disappointing.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:03 am
Matthew wrote:paulsweeney wrote:We do care about production quality. You imply that there are low standards of expectation from the fans, and as a result we get low production values. You are dead wrong Matthew.
No, I am saying that if the fan-base does not care about silly mastering and production errors, why should anyone else? In that, I am quite right. There are many here implying that we should be thankful for each and every release, warts and all, without complaint - regardless of problems like tapes playing too slow to present the recordings correctly. That, is cause for concern.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:45 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:18 am
Matthew wrote:paulsweeney wrote:We do care about production quality. You imply that there are low standards of expectation from the fans, and as a result we get low production values. You are dead wrong Matthew.
No, I am saying that if the fan-base does not care about silly mastering and production errors, why should anyone else? In that, I am quite right. There are many here implying that we should be thankful for each and every release, warts and all, without complaint ...
Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:25 am
drjohncarpenter wrote:it is irksome to note 91% of your posts bitching about 9% of FTD releases, while maybe 9% of your comments praise the 91% that have brightened our lives since the label began in 1999.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:33 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:36 am
dannyboy1 wrote:Did you notice that regarding the PFAP release they said they had to speed up the film to match the sound? If they had instead slowed the sound to match the film then that release would have been well worth its money. Instead we get both at the wrong speed. Very disappointing.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:44 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:52 am
YDKM wrote:with FTD, Bootlegs, written reviews articles etc.. EVERYONE SHOULD AIM to be 100% perfect..... but Geez that is so difficult to achieve eh/ and (i guess) FTD suffers from mistakes just like the rest of us eh??
Sun Dec 02, 2012 1:56 pm
Blue River wrote:But we're not charging Ernst or SONY anything for our mistakes... eh?
Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:03 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:Blue River wrote:But we're not charging Ernst or SONY anything for our mistakes... eh?
Suggestion: stop buying anything by a label that charges you for their mistakes.
Start the FTD boycott now: skip these upcoming titles, they'll get the message!
Back In Memphis (Classic Album)
3000 South Paradise Road (8-12-1972 DS + 8-1972 rehearsal)
G.I. Blues (Double LPl)
Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:19 pm
bajo wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote:Blue River wrote:But we're not charging Ernst or SONY anything for our mistakes... eh?
Suggestion: stop buying anything by a label that charges you for their mistakes.
Start the FTD boycott now: skip these upcoming titles, they'll get the message!
Back In Memphis (Classic Album)
3000 South Paradise Road (8-12-1972 DS + 8-1972 rehearsal)
G.I. Blues (Double LPl)
I agree! Especially 3000 South Paradise Road is a potential, major let down! I'll get for what it is! Not for moaning over it if I don't like it. So, for those who may be sceptical. Wait until you read about how bad or good it is. Save your money and sleep well at night!
Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:20 pm
rlj4ep wrote:As an Elvis fan, I don't have the time to sit around and notice such things. "Glitches," what some call errors, are just what they are, momentary glithes. If this upsets a purchaser, then don't buy the product. Perhaps on the Hawaii/Vegas release someone certainly should have noted the slower speed, I suppose. But the typos and other glitches seems rather insignificant to me. I listen to the CD, if I like it I revisit it again. I am just grateful that FTD takes the time and money and to make these gems available to the Elvis fans. With all of the negative complaining I hope FTD remembers that there are fans who appreciate all that they are doing. I focus on the great releases they are giving us, which in the case of many of them, we would not have were it not for FTD. I appreciate all of the time and investment FTD is making. FTD shows they care in the case of "So High" and "Fool" as they did correct the error by providing us with a replecement CD.
rlj
Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:23 pm
Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:29 pm
Matthew wrote:Let us hope they've checked the rehearsal tape speed this time around, hey fellas!
Sun Dec 02, 2012 3:44 pm
Chad Gates wrote:Tony.. wrote:According to a contributor in the latest "Elvis the man & his music" magazine, the recent FTD rehearsal release runs 5% too slow. He blames Lene Reidel for this latest cock up. Anyone know what went wrong this time?
Looking on the bright side you got 5% extra running time for free![]()
.
Alan.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 3:55 pm
Tony.. wrote:So you are saying that these mistakes are not important to you when spending £20 on a poor quality to start with cassette tape transfer?
Hosted by ElviCities