Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:15 am
Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:19 am
Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:37 am
brian wrote:No.
The lyrics were too weak to be a #1 hit.
It was also clear that in the 1970s that RCA's strategy of just sending the song to radio and hoping the fans would go out and buy it wasn't working anymore.
If Elvis wanted another #1 hit he needed to promote his singles by going on television.
Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:58 am
SuspiciousMind wrote:brian wrote:No.
The lyrics were too weak to be a #1 hit.
It was also clear that in the 1970s that RCA's strategy of just sending the song to radio and hoping the fans would go out and buy it wasn't working anymore.
If Elvis wanted another #1 hit he needed to promote his singles by going on television.
The lyrics, for 1976, were about right considering what was being sung and written at that time. RCA though could only put out what he recorded. But he gave them nothing solid to promote in 1977. So it wasn't thier fault. Way Down did well, but wasn't the true rock song like Fire Down Below would have been.
Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:29 am
Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:20 pm
Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:26 pm
Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:52 pm
A. C. van Kuijk wrote:I guess "Fire Down Below" would have been as weak as "Way Down". The band surely would have rocked the song, but Elvis would have sounded tired and not like a Rock' n Roll singer at all.
Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:01 pm
Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:06 pm
Hosted by ElviCities