Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:40 am
Matthew wrote:Some of the rough mixes are interesting, especially if they are close to the session conclusions like those on Elvis Country, as they become performance mixes. The Today mixes are of interest as well. They are also a cheaper way of in some cases presenting undubbed masters without having to create new mixes, which I've no doubt it partly why they're used! Why create a new undubbed mix when "hey!" here's one from 1976 already!
Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:04 am
elvis-fan wrote:elvisjock wrote:How do we know they didn't work on the masters?
By what's listed as "credits" for the FEPB FTD... it say Remastered by Vic Anesini... if the tracks were remixed, it would state it...midnightx wrote:Why should the masters be remixed? A historically accurate mix for the masters should be commended.
Sure but they've been available since 2009. The FEPB album masters are terribly dull/muddy sounding on the original LP... and while the remastered 2009 CD is an improvement, it's not much of one. It would be great if they were on par with the recordings as heard on The Jungle Room Sessions... remastering the original mixes is not enough to accomplish this.
elvisjock wrote:My point it is, they did the whole thing backwards. Instead of artificially making the records sound "normal," they missed a chance to get back to basics and do something different.
Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:12 am
elvisjock wrote:At the time, recording Elvis at Graceland was seen as nothing but a hassle. It was the only way they were going to get him to open his mouth and sing. The venue was a handicap. Colonel only cared that Felton came up with the requisite album and single cuts.
Had there been a single person in the organization charged with creativity (even if it was a known quantity like Schilling), it might have dawned on them that the so-called crisis presented an opportunity. Hey, cutting a record at Elvis' house. That could be COOL! Instead, they took recordings that turned out to be of surprisingly high technical quality, and they ruined them with strings and horns and God knows what else.
My point it is, they did the whole thing backwards. Instead of artificially making the records sound "normal," they missed a chance to get back to basics and do something different.
Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:20 am
midnightx wrote:Isn't the atrocious Ferrente 2000 edition a remix?
Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:13 am
Matthew wrote:midnightx wrote:Isn't the atrocious Ferrente 2000 edition a remix?
No, just a really bad remaster. For some reason people assumed it was remixed due to the Promised Land release around the same time, no idea why.
Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:05 pm
Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:07 pm
Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:31 pm
Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:14 pm
elvisjock wrote:At the time, recording Elvis at Graceland was seen as nothing but a hassle. It was the only way they were going to get him to open his mouth and sing. The venue was a handicap. Colonel only cared that Felton came up with the requisite album and single cuts.
Had there been a single person in the organization charged with creativity (even if it was a known quantity like Schilling), it might have dawned on them that the so-called crisis presented an opportunity. Hey, cutting a record at Elvis' house. That could be COOL! Instead, they took recordings that turned out to be of surprisingly high technical quality, and they ruined them with strings and horns and God knows what else.
My point it is, they did the whole thing backwards. Instead of artificially making the records sound "normal," they missed a chance to get back to basics and do something different.
Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:24 pm
Good Time Charlie wrote:elvisjock wrote:At the time, recording Elvis at Graceland was seen as nothing but a hassle. It was the only way they were going to get him to open his mouth and sing. The venue was a handicap. Colonel only cared that Felton came up with the requisite album and single cuts.
Had there been a single person in the organization charged with creativity (even if it was a known quantity like Schilling), it might have dawned on them that the so-called crisis presented an opportunity. Hey, cutting a record at Elvis' house. That could be COOL! Instead, they took recordings that turned out to be of surprisingly high technical quality, and they ruined them with strings and horns and God knows what else.
My point it is, they did the whole thing backwards. Instead of artificially making the records sound "normal," they missed a chance to get back to basics and do something different.
Good points.
What it all comes down to was Elvis. Even had Felton thought, great, lets record Elvis like when he's at home jamming with his friends, singing all those old classics - it would have required Elvis to engage artistically too. I would have loved nothing more than RCA recording an album of Elvis at home at Graceland, on guitar and piano, with minimal / no backing, even with the voice he was in, in 1976.
Perhaps they could have played on his moods. We are often told Elvis was in some kind of a depressed state in 1976, and the musicians would be hanging around Graceland, not knowing whether Elvis would leave his bedroom that day to record. Part of me wishes that could have somehow translated into RCA recording a sombre and broken Elvis sitting alone at the piano. Of course, this would have still needed Elvis to engage somewhat, but had they just brought in the minimal amount of people required to operate the recording equipment and Felton to produce everything, it might have encouraged Elvis to really engage in proper music making and open up almost. As if he was just sitting at home alone singing for his own comfort, instead of 'working'. It seems like Elvis almost fell out love with music towards the end of his life, as the recording process and touring became almost a chore. I know people will argue that is not true, but when you see the total disinterest Elvis had in his career by this point, I can't come to any other conclusion.
Just somehow, some way, somebody needed to coax Elvis out of that rut and start enjoying making great records and taking a keen interest in it. Perhaps that would have been the only way for him to solve the other personal and health issues he had in his life.
Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:52 pm
JerryNodak wrote:JohanD wrote:Every upcoming FTD release i look forward too.
Back in Memphis, EP Boulevard, the '72 reharsal and show...
But this one even more... a trip down memory lane.
And with the upgrading of bonus tracks, it's truly Hits of the 70's.
My grey played album and boolteg cd will finally have a worthy first grade companion.
I very much look forward to this release as well. It will get lots of time in my cd player. It may well become my favorite FTD.
Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:08 pm
poormadpeter wrote:Good Time Charlie wrote:elvisjock wrote:At the time, recording Elvis at Graceland was seen as nothing but a hassle. It was the only way they were going to get him to open his mouth and sing. The venue was a handicap. Colonel only cared that Felton came up with the requisite album and single cuts.
Had there been a single person in the organization charged with creativity (even if it was a known quantity like Schilling), it might have dawned on them that the so-called crisis presented an opportunity. Hey, cutting a record at Elvis' house. That could be COOL! Instead, they took recordings that turned out to be of surprisingly high technical quality, and they ruined them with strings and horns and God knows what else.
My point it is, they did the whole thing backwards. Instead of artificially making the records sound "normal," they missed a chance to get back to basics and do something different.
Good points.
What it all comes down to was Elvis. Even had Felton thought, great, lets record Elvis like when he's at home jamming with his friends, singing all those old classics - it would have required Elvis to engage artistically too. I would have loved nothing more than RCA recording an album of Elvis at home at Graceland, on guitar and piano, with minimal / no backing, even with the voice he was in, in 1976.
Perhaps they could have played on his moods. We are often told Elvis was in some kind of a depressed state in 1976, and the musicians would be hanging around Graceland, not knowing whether Elvis would leave his bedroom that day to record. Part of me wishes that could have somehow translated into RCA recording a sombre and broken Elvis sitting alone at the piano. Of course, this would have still needed Elvis to engage somewhat, but had they just brought in the minimal amount of people required to operate the recording equipment and Felton to produce everything, it might have encouraged Elvis to really engage in proper music making and open up almost. As if he was just sitting at home alone singing for his own comfort, instead of 'working'. It seems like Elvis almost fell out love with music towards the end of his life, as the recording process and touring became almost a chore. I know people will argue that is not true, but when you see the total disinterest Elvis had in his career by this point, I can't come to any other conclusion.
Just somehow, some way, somebody needed to coax Elvis out of that rut and start enjoying making great records and taking a keen interest in it. Perhaps that would have been the only way for him to solve the other personal and health issues he had in his life.
I'm no expert on the sessions by any means, but I think there was a sign of Elvis running off with an old tune in Pledging My Love. Certainly the October session found Elvis in much better voice than the Feb efforts and the results are, on the whole, more engaging.
Sat Sep 22, 2012 11:25 pm
Sat Sep 22, 2012 11:48 pm
rlj4ep wrote:It's really too bad that Elvis never laid down a vocal for "Fire Down Below." Could have been a major hit in 1977, IMHO. I don't know, maybe at this point Elvis couldn't handle that type of song(?). Maybe deep down he knew that.
Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:14 am
Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:36 am
rlj4ep wrote:It's really too bad that Elvis never laid down a vocal for "Fire Down Below." Could have been a major hit in 1977, IMHO. I don't know, maybe at this point Elvis couldn't handle that type of song(?). Maybe deep down he knew that.
Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:41 am
Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:56 pm
Rob wrote:Rigs wrote:I don't know who is more retarted the producers or the ones who will buy this turd of a release!
What are your thoughts about the ones who can't spell it?
I'm still skeptical about this actually being released by FTD. I'll believe it when I see it. However, if this is really released by FTD, I'm kissing someone's ass.
It will also be the first FTD release that I skip.
Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:07 pm
elvis-fan wrote:elvisjock wrote:How do we know they didn't work on the masters?
By what's listed as "credits" for the FEPB FTD... it say Remastered by Vic Anesini... if the tracks were remixed, it would state it...midnightx wrote:Why should the masters be remixed? A historically accurate mix for the masters should be commended.
Sure but they've been available since 2009. The FEPB album masters are terribly dull/muddy sounding on the original LP... and while the remastered 2009 CD is an improvement, it's not much of one. It would be great if they were on par with the recordings as heard on The Jungle Room Sessions... remastering the original mixes is not enough to accomplish this.
Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:11 pm
Tony.. wrote:I thought you always say you like squandering / wasting money???
Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:25 pm
Rob wrote:Tony.. wrote:I thought you always say you like squandering / wasting money???
I have to be at least a little interested in it first. This release gets no interest whatsoever. It would never get played.
I guess I could buy it and use the CDs for drink coasters.
Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:28 pm
Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:35 pm
Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:45 pm
Mon Oct 01, 2012 3:48 pm
Hosted by ElviCities