Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:19 pm
Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:34 pm
Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:06 pm
jurasic1968 wrote:And about the OD in 1973 it's unlikely for Elvis to do a very good show in St. Louis and after that make an overdose.
Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:14 pm
Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:22 am
Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:17 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:jurasic1968 wrote:And about the OD in 1973 it's unlikely for Elvis to do a very good show in St. Louis and after that make an overdose.
No, there are many examples of performers having an overdose one day, and being on stage the next. For example, Nirvana's Kurt Cobain had a 1993 overdose in New York on July 22, recovered and played Roseland Ballroom the next evening -- and no one saw anything amiss in the performance.
Nirvana - "Lithium," Roseland Ballroom, New York - Friday, July 23, 1993
What I have yet to determine is whether Elvis' mishap occurred prior to -- or after -- the June 28, 1973 performance in St. Louis.
Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:32 pm
Mike Eder wrote:Could it have happened in 1976 and not 1973?
Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:31 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:Mike Eder wrote:Could it have happened in 1976 and not 1973?
You have forgotten that we've gone over this before.
Assistant "Hamburger James" Caughley was not with Elvis in 1976. This is one reason why my Cobain analogy is applicable to the event in St. Louis in 1973. And, like Elvis, Kurt gave a great show after recovering. Your confusion about dates stems in part from the fact that Peter Guralnick attributes problems in St. Louis to 1976, despite his source actually citing 1973.
See -->
Elvis in St. Louis, March 1976: Reviewed by "Rolling Stone"
http://www.elvis-collectors.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=48071
Hosted by ElviCities