Sat Mar 30, 2013 11:41 pm
Sun Mar 31, 2013 12:55 am
takecare wrote:News ?,
Sun Mar 31, 2013 5:18 am
Sun Mar 31, 2013 8:22 am
Sun Mar 31, 2013 2:13 pm
Sun Mar 31, 2013 2:45 pm
elvis-fan wrote:Very well thought out, essential thread!
Thanks for posting!!!
Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:29 pm
TCB-FAN wrote:elvis-fan wrote:Very well thought out, essential thread!
Thanks for posting!!!
Your sarcasm is killing me. Stop it.
Sun Mar 31, 2013 8:18 pm
.
Sun Mar 31, 2013 9:46 pm
Mike Windgren wrote:Hi there!!![]()
![]()
.
They are probably out of business and will come out under a different label. That's what happened with the Madison label. Bye for now
.
Sun Mar 31, 2013 9:48 pm
Mike Windgren wrote:They are probably out of business and will come out under a different label. That's what happened with the Madison label.
Sun Mar 31, 2013 10:35 pm
Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:14 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:Mike Windgren wrote:They are probably out of business and will come out under a different label. That's what happened with the Madison label.
This is actually incorrect.
.
Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:27 pm
Mike Windgren wrote:Dear Doc!. I stated probably.
Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:36 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:Mike Windgren wrote:Dear Doc!. I stated probably.
Right. What information was your comment based on? Just curious.
.
Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:44 pm
Mike Windgren wrote:Because it has been awhile since the latest cd release and bootleg labels changes names to avoid to be caught by internet police. It is not the first time they did so. Do you remember lables like: Fort Baxter, 2001, Madison?, well they are all the same..
Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:59 pm
drjohncarpenter wrote:Mike Windgren wrote:Because it has been awhile since the latest cd release and bootleg labels changes names to avoid to be caught by internet police. It is not the first time they did so. Do you remember lables like: Fort Baxter, 2001, Madison?, well they are all the same..
Actually, no, they were not.
So your post was based on nothing. OK, thanks for clarifying.
. Again, please share your inside info
. Bye for now
.
Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:10 am
Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:12 am
Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:15 am
Mike Windgren wrote:Thank you for not clarifying on your side as well ...
Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:38 am
drjohncarpenter wrote:Mike Windgren wrote:Thank you for not clarifying on your side as well ...
I made no statement. I only pointed out that yours was erroneous, and you have admitted it was based on nothing.
As for the old labels, the best ones were primarily run by xxxxxx xxxxxx and xxxxxx xxxxx, and for a while xxx xxxxx joined up, but it was only a temporary thing. They then went their separate ways. The labels ended when pressure from xxx became too much.
Hope this helps.
.
Mon Apr 01, 2013 1:44 am
Mike Windgren wrote: xxxxxx, doesn´t work for me ...
Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:11 am
drjohncarpenter wrote:Mike Windgren wrote: xxxxxx, doesn´t work for me ...
You're joking, right?
Because if you aren't, there's a noun that springs immediately to mind.
. In other words, I wanted to ask above what your sources are as you many times claim when somebody post something
.
Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:49 am
Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:38 am
drjohncarpenter wrote:You're not joking. My goodness.
Hold on, I'll post the names and addresses of all import CD makers in a just a sec ... hang on ...
. Good luck!. Bye for now
.
Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:38 pm
Mike Windgren wrote:No I am not joking ...
Hosted by ElviCities