Anything about Elvis
Moderators: Moderator5 , Moderator3 , FECC-Moderator , Site Mechanic
Topic author
CHR1S
Posts: 579Registered for: 14 years 1 month Location: GreeceHas thanked: 4 times Been thanked: 4 times Age: 39
#773126
Post
by CHR1S Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:57 am
I recently got the region 2 dvd for Loving you.To my surprice it turns out to be a full screen presentation but when I saw the movie it looked to me that nothing was missing from the sides, in fact I got more picture than a widscreen!!
Check the pocket on Elvis suit. In region 2 you see the whole pocket and the button.But in region 1 you barely see it!!
same goes for the top 2 more lights in region 2.
But in region 1 on the left ,you see more from the letter A on the sign behind them and on the right you see were the sign ends!!
region 2
region 1
weird?!!
Last edited by
CHR1S on Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
drjohncarpenter
Posts: 108403Registered for: 21 years 3 months Location: United States of AmericaHas thanked: 12012 times Been thanked: 35631 times Age: 89
#773129
Post
by drjohncarpenter Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:06 am
It may mean the producers of the DVD screwed up the aspect ratio for letterboxed format.
. Dr. John Carpenter, M.D. Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!
KiwiAlan
Posts: 11660Registered for: 21 years 3 months Location: Wellington, New ZealandBeen thanked: 16 times
#773131
Post
by KiwiAlan Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:08 am
Are these both the NBC versions?
When you get to the point where you really understand your computer, it's probably obsolete
Topic author
CHR1S
Posts: 579Registered for: 14 years 1 month Location: GreeceHas thanked: 4 times Been thanked: 4 times Age: 39
#773132
Post
by CHR1S Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:11 am
KiwiAlan wrote: Are these both the NBC versions?
the region 2 is nbc, the region 1 I found it online. Could someone make a screen cap from region 1 to compare?
ekenee
Banned: VERY angry previously returning member. Banned for abuse of the forum. ****Same Member as Mississippi1935****
Posts: 9807Registered for: 21 years 3 months Has thanked: 3 times Been thanked: 98 times
#773138
Post
by ekenee Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:28 am
I have often wondered if they do this on purpose as a kind of "widescreen" scam.
Topic author
CHR1S
Posts: 579Registered for: 14 years 1 month Location: GreeceHas thanked: 4 times Been thanked: 4 times Age: 39
#773141
Post
by CHR1S Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:33 am
ekenee wrote: I have often wondered if they do this on purpose as a kind of "widescreen" scam.
my thoughts exactly!!so I guess that 2 Marilyn Monroe movies I have in full screen might have the same thing!
Frankie Teardrop
Posts: 3584Registered for: 14 years 7 months Been thanked: 8 times
#773145
Post
by Frankie Teardrop Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:42 am
When widescreen films that utilise the matte process (which masks off part of the camera frame and is then blown up to widescreen size, to avoid the distortions sometimes found in Panavision/Cinemascope) are shown in full screen, it reveals more of the picture than originally intended (sometimes revealing things such as boom mikes).
"Computers may outthink us one day, but as long as people got feelings, we'll be better than they are"
Frankie Teardrop
Posts: 3584Registered for: 14 years 7 months Been thanked: 8 times
#773146
Post
by Frankie Teardrop Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:43 am
ekenee wrote: I have often wondered if they do this on purpose as a kind of "widescreen" scam.
No, the film was shown in 1:85:1 widescreen ratio in cinemas.
"Computers may outthink us one day, but as long as people got feelings, we'll be better than they are"
Topic author
CHR1S
Posts: 579Registered for: 14 years 1 month Location: GreeceHas thanked: 4 times Been thanked: 4 times Age: 39
#773150
Post
by CHR1S Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:50 am
Frankie Teardrop wrote: ekenee wrote: I have often wondered if they do this on purpose as a kind of "widescreen" scam.
No, the film was shown in 1:85:1 widescreen ratio in cinemas.
so that means the "correct" version is a combination of both ?
Frankie Teardrop
Posts: 3584Registered for: 14 years 7 months Been thanked: 8 times
#773151
Post
by Frankie Teardrop Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:54 am
CHR1S wrote: Frankie Teardrop wrote: ekenee wrote: I have often wondered if they do this on purpose as a kind of "widescreen" scam.
No, the film was shown in 1:85:1 widescreen ratio in cinemas.
so that means the "correct" version is a combination of both ?
No, the correct version is widescreen, not full screen. You are seeing more picture there than was intended.
"Computers may outthink us one day, but as long as people got feelings, we'll be better than they are"
Topic author
CHR1S
Posts: 579Registered for: 14 years 1 month Location: GreeceHas thanked: 4 times Been thanked: 4 times Age: 39
#773154
Post
by CHR1S Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:58 am
Frankie Teardrop wrote:
so in away the full screen version is like a "uncut colectable" in this case.
drjohncarpenter
Posts: 108403Registered for: 21 years 3 months Location: United States of AmericaHas thanked: 12012 times Been thanked: 35631 times Age: 89
#773156
Post
by drjohncarpenter Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:14 am
Frankie Teardrop wrote: When widescreen films that utilise the matte process (which masks off part of the camera frame and is then blown up to widescreen size, to avoid the distortions sometimes found in Panavision/Cinemascope) are shown in full screen, it reveals more of the picture than originally intended (sometimes revealing things such as boom mikes).
You're absolutely right -- I forgot all about this. Nice post.
. Dr. John Carpenter, M.D. Stop, look and listen, baby <<--->> that's my philosophy!
ekenee
Banned: VERY angry previously returning member. Banned for abuse of the forum. ****Same Member as Mississippi1935****
Posts: 9807Registered for: 21 years 3 months Has thanked: 3 times Been thanked: 98 times
#773169
Post
by ekenee Thu Jun 17, 2010 4:19 am
Frankie Teardrop wrote: ekenee wrote: I have often wondered if they do this on purpose as a kind of "widescreen" scam.
No, the film was shown in 1:85:1 widescreen ratio in cinemas.
You missed my point completely.
dannyboy1
On Suspension Until Further Notice...
Posts: 1520Registered for: 20 years 3 months Has thanked: 6 times Been thanked: 179 times
#773196
Post
by dannyboy1 Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:14 am
Add to this the fact that the top photo (region 2) is out of its correct aspect ratio, with Elvis and Delores looking much too thin. It's like they tried to squeeze the full widescreen angle into the narrower 4:3 frame. Always hate that.
"The way you looked, the sound of your laughing..."
Topic author
CHR1S
Posts: 579Registered for: 14 years 1 month Location: GreeceHas thanked: 4 times Been thanked: 4 times Age: 39
#773204
Post
by CHR1S Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:07 am
dannyboy1 wrote: Add to this the fact that the top photo (region 2) is out of its correct aspect ratio, with Elvis and Delores looking much too thin. It's like they tried to squeeze the full widescreen angle into the narrower 4:3 frame. Always hate that.
actualy the look thin beacuase when I take screen shots from my dvd player it tends to "push" the image "inside". also don forget that there is more picture from the downside
but in the end do you guys think I should keep this or buy a widescrren version?
memphisflash
#773247
Post
by memphisflash Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:34 pm
this is a screen dump I made from the USA widescreen version - seems to me open matte ... looking at this DVD, it about time for a restored blu-ray !
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by memphisflash on Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Topic author
CHR1S
Posts: 579Registered for: 14 years 1 month Location: GreeceHas thanked: 4 times Been thanked: 4 times Age: 39
#773254
Post
by CHR1S Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:05 pm
memphisflash wrote: this is a screen dumb I made from the USA widescreen version - seems to me open matte ... looking at this DVD, it about time for a restored blu-ray !
this is better from the one I found. It seems that both have and missing the same amount of picture depending on the frame.Region 2 more picture on top and bottom.Region 1 more picture left and right. so in a way the ultimate picture frame could come from a combination of both!!
TONY
Posts: 5662Registered for: 21 years 3 months Location: MIDDLESEXBeen thanked: 9 times
Contact:
#773255
Post
by TONY Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:21 pm
I'd like to own a version of "Double trouble" with The Weire Brothers 'squeezed out'!!
ekenee
Banned: VERY angry previously returning member. Banned for abuse of the forum. ****Same Member as Mississippi1935****
Posts: 9807Registered for: 21 years 3 months Has thanked: 3 times Been thanked: 98 times
#773323
Post
by ekenee Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:52 pm
Both examples have information missing. One from the sides, and the other from the top and bottom.
Topic author
CHR1S
Posts: 579Registered for: 14 years 1 month Location: GreeceHas thanked: 4 times Been thanked: 4 times Age: 39
#773339
Post
by CHR1S Thu Jun 17, 2010 6:44 pm
ekenee wrote: Yes, a nice re-release is in order, considering its not in print anymore, and diffiult to find.
are they gonna re-release it? when?
ColinB
Posts: 29384Registered for: 21 years 3 months Location: Gravesend, UKHas thanked: 73 times Been thanked: 101 times
Contact:
#773374
Post
by ColinB Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:19 pm
Frankie Teardrop wrote: ekenee wrote: I have often wondered if they do this on purpose as a kind of "widescreen" scam.
No, the film was shown in 1:85:1 widescreen ratio in cinemas.
I have it listed as being 1:78:1..................
Colin B Judge a man not by his answers, but by his questions - Voltaire
Frankie Teardrop
Posts: 3584Registered for: 14 years 7 months Been thanked: 8 times
#773376
Post
by Frankie Teardrop Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:24 pm
ColinB wrote: Frankie Teardrop wrote: ekenee wrote: I have often wondered if they do this on purpose as a kind of "widescreen" scam.
No, the film was shown in 1:85:1 widescreen ratio in cinemas.
I have it listed as being 1:78:1..................
Correct, sorry about that!
"Computers may outthink us one day, but as long as people got feelings, we'll be better than they are"
Claus
#773384
Post
by Claus Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:45 pm
Frankie Teardrop wrote: ColinB wrote: Frankie Teardrop wrote: ekenee wrote: I have often wondered if they do this on purpose as a kind of "widescreen" scam.
No, the film was shown in 1:85:1 widescreen ratio in cinemas.
I have it listed as being 1.78:1..................
Correct, sorry about that!
The r1 dvd is closer to 1.78:1 than 1.85:1. The OAR is 1.85:1 according to imdb. Not that it makes much difference...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050659/technical
ColinB
Posts: 29384Registered for: 21 years 3 months Location: Gravesend, UKHas thanked: 73 times Been thanked: 101 times
Contact:
#773386
Post
by ColinB Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:48 pm
Claus wrote: Frankie Teardrop wrote: ColinB wrote: Frankie Teardrop wrote: ekenee wrote: I have often wondered if they do this on purpose as a kind of "widescreen" scam.
No, the film was shown in 1:85:1 widescreen ratio in cinemas.
I have it listed as being 1.78:1..................
Correct, sorry about that!
The r1 dvd is closer to 1.78:1 than 1.85:1.
The OAR is 1.85:1 according to imdb.
Not that it makes much difference...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050659/technical
Well, it's nice to get it right !
Can't remember where I got the ratio from now........... but I would think the IMDB site would be correct, wouldn't it ?
Colin B Judge a man not by his answers, but by his questions - Voltaire
Claus
#773394
Post
by Claus Thu Jun 17, 2010 10:15 pm
Imdb isn't always correct but I think it is in this case.
