c.man wrote:... he does have some valid points when it comes to our beloved artist.
- Elvis was a junkie!
- Elvis loved junkfood and medicated drugs (for whatever reason)
- Elvis his voice in general was declining in his final years except for those rare moments when it still showed his class (unchained melody,hurt) Nobody remembered Little Darlin'? It sounded like he was out of breath.
- Elvis was a blue collar as they would call now "white trash"
Valid points?
Your first two examples tell us almost nothing about Elvis, but a lot about the author, who despised rock and roll and the drug culture which sprang up in the 1960s, and frames most of his opinions through this warped perspective.
Your third "valid point" is hardly a novel observation, and in Goldman's case, he provides no context for Elvis' vocal troubles in the later years. In fact, there is no point in the book where he give Elvis sole credit for any musical accomplishment.
Perhaps it is because you are not from America that the fourth "valid point" escapes you -- Gladys, Vernon and Elvis Presley were NOT "white trash," except in the eyes of a Northern intellectual snob like Goldman.
Goldman's failure was a twisting of the facts -- or simply getting them wrong, or ignoring them altogether -- to suit his agenda, which was to dismiss Elvis' art, accomplishments, and southern background.
To top it off, it was all written in a hateful fashion. Here is a man who devoted years of his life to create a biography on someone he disliked and whose music he found awful. How dysfunctional is that?