Anything about Elvis
More than 30 Million visitors can't be wrong
Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:48 pm
elvisrecords.us wrote:The point that I believe some have tried to make was RCA still pressing copies after December 1958. I don't believe so.
You may well be right. But could LOC 1035 overstock have lasted for the 1958-1963 holiday seasons?
-----
At this point I offer a big thank you to the following members who added
something positive to this topic:
elvisfan_48079
Mike Windgren
Frankie Teardrop
ekenee
rickeap
Hav-A-Tampa
Alexander
Steve Morse
painterboy
MysteryTrain
Little Darlin
Mike C
hollandgroupc2008
Juan Luis
jbnva58
paulsweeney
Mississippi
KiwiAlan
londonflash
Barry
PEP
epf
Mike Eder
pjdlibra
Luuk
wwelvis
PetriTCB
RonBaker2003
Mister Mike
norrieIt is for you, and all the fans who visit this forum worldwide, that I make the effort.
---
An extra special shout out goes to
elvisrecords.us, whose scans from fifty year-old
Schwann and
RCA Victor catalogs, not to mention some of the great album art seen on page 1, helped cement the goals of my topic.
His clean, beautifully organized and easy-to-navigate website is
HIGHLY recommended:
www.elvisrecords.us | The Elvis Presley Record Research Databasehttp://www.elvisrecords.us/---
It's fun to
rewrite history, even if it's just one EP and one LP in the enormous Elvis Presley U.S. discography.
If I get any more credible information, I'll add it here.
You can TRUST the DOC!
Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:35 am
Thanks for starting this informative thread, Doc.
One fact I neglected to mention. I purchased a mint copy of LOC 1035 from Rocky Barra, publisher of Strictly Elvis, in 1972. I was told that he or Taylor Scott noticed a record store ad in a Detroit newspaper advertising Elvis' "double" Christmas album. When the went to investigate they found a cashe of LOC 1035 for sale at the normal price for what would be a double album at the time -- maybe $9 or $10. Needless to say, they bought the whole lot. I paid $45 for my mint copy, which was in strink wrap, complete with the gold sticker. So, at least one store in the U.S.A. was stocking LOC 1035 as late as 1972.
MT
Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:39 am
drjohncarpenter wrote:An extra special shout out goes to
elvisrecords.us, whose scans from fifty year-old
Schwann and
RCA Victor catalogs, not to mention some of the great album art seen on page 1, helped cement the goals of my topic.
His clean, beautifully organized and easy-to-navigate website is
HIGHLY recommended:
www.elvisrecords.us | The Elvis Presley Record Research Databasehttp://www.elvisrecords.us/
Totally agree - and that website is awesome.
Thanks for a very interesting and informative thread, Doc.
Rich
Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:57 am
Rich_TCB wrote:drjohncarpenter wrote:An extra special shout out goes to
elvisrecords.us, whose scans from fifty year-old
Schwann and
RCA Victor catalogs, not to mention some of the great album art seen on page 1, helped cement the goals of my topic.
His clean, beautifully organized and easy-to-navigate website is
HIGHLY recommended:
www.elvisrecords.us | The Elvis Presley Record Research Databasehttp://www.elvisrecords.us/
Totally agree - and that website is awesome.
Thanks for a very interesting and informative thread, Doc.
Rich
+1!
Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:58 am
Just a small update to a terrific topic -->
From: Ernst Jørgensen'
A note: Somebody checked LPM 1951 for me.
The matrix numbers for the LP sides are 1957 numbers, so they are of no use for dating the release.
If anything else comes to light, please post it here. I will do the same.
Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:42 pm
Memphis....um, R&B player, your agenda is loud and clear. Like all others who continuously get banned and rejoin FECC, you hang in there for a little while with your "new" user id, and when you can't take it any longer, you blow a gasket and start aggressively posting knowing full well another ban is coming. Who cares, right? You'll just rejoin a few weeks later! And the best part, you and your pals in the waiting room get to enjoy another psychotic laugh together! Yay!
Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:47 pm
midnightx wrote:Memphis....um, R&B player, your agenda is loud and clear. Like all others who continuously get banned and rejoin FECC, you hang in there for a little while with your "new" user id, and when you can't take it any longer, you blow a gasket and start aggressively posting knowing full well another ban is coming. Who cares, right? You'll just rejoin a few weeks later! And the best part, you and your pals in the waiting room get to enjoy another psychotic laugh together! Yay!
Careful - you might get the attentions of
1965, and you don't be wanting that now do ya?! Try to stay clear of the school gates children! (shudder)
Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:21 am
Memphis, I'm not talking about the Doc, nor defending him. I am merely pointing out that your barrage of 7 posts is a bit extreme and clearly designed to attack the "Monkey Business" nemesis. You and your pals are very transparent with your "new" user ids and agenda. Have fun!
Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:40 am
"The Doc.." (eye-twitch) "The Doc.." (eye-twitch) "The Doc.." (eye-twitch) "The Doc.." (eye-twitch) "The Doc.." (eye-twitch)
There's a remedy for your ailment - close your web browser and open the curtains.
Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:41 am
fantastic research Doc as always.
Mon Apr 04, 2011 4:12 am
midnightx wrote:Memphis, I'm not talking about the Doc, nor defending him. I am merely pointing out that your barrage of 7 posts is a bit extreme and clearly designed to attack the "Monkey Business" nemesis. You and your pals are very transparent with your "new" user ids and agenda. Have fun!
Ironic that you are calling others "transparent". Just saying...
Everyone can see what your clicke is up to.
Never ceases to amaze me.
Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:34 am
pjdlibra wrote:fantastic research Doc as always.

Thank you. I spent hours on this topic.
Please forgive the rantings on the page, the internet is a public place, sometimes that's to our mutual misfortune.
Thanks to
midnightx and
Matthew for their support.
Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:00 pm
Doc...
Great research, as always. It was both thought provoking and encouraged additional research to support or dispell a valid theory. Either way, it generated interest and created a discussion. That's what I like about this forum.
Mon Apr 04, 2011 10:03 pm
elvisrecords.us wrote:Doc...
Great research, as always. It was both thought provoking and encouraged additional research to support or dispell a valid theory. Either way, it generated interest and created a discussion. That's what I like about this forum.
Thank you so very much.
In case everyone does not already know,
elvisrecords.us has the best Presley vinyl discography website I have ever seen:
www.elvisrecords.us | The Elvis Presley Record Research Database
Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:10 am
The Canadian 1958--LPM-1951
DSCN0019.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:11 am
EP
DSCN0021.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:12 am
EP
DSCN0020.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:37 am
Barry, that is one heck of a clean LP!
Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:50 am
Barry wrote:The Canadian 1958--LPM-1951
DSCN0019.JPG
I bet it's worth a whole bunch.
Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:37 am
I uploaded some larger versions of my screen shots to the original post. Enjoy.
Thu Apr 12, 2012 2:34 am
The original shipping date for LPM-1951 was September 25, 1959 for October 1959 release.
I received this update from Keith Flynn. I have updated the dates on my website with the information he had provided me. References to all his material and interesting pieces of information are provided within each of the posts below.
My linkshttp://www.elvisrecords.us/lpm-1951-elv ... mas-album/http://www.elvisrecords.us/lpm-1951-elv ... etermined/I have also corrected the date for EPA-4340 which holds the same image as LPM-1951. Mistakenly it was 9/1958. Corrected with the relevant documentation and sources.
http://www.elvisrecords.us/epa-4340-chr ... ith-elvis/
Last edited by elvisrecords.us on Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:08 am
Any chance that this may originally have been planned as a 10" LP? 8 songs, 4 per side...no Peace in the Valley tracks?
Fri Apr 13, 2012 11:50 am
Doc this is one Kick-Ass Topic!!
Although I had nothing to contribute, I thoroughly enjoyed reading every post , These type quality topics is what makes FECC so much fun and at the same time very imformative reading.
Hope to have even more of these from the masterminds
DJC and Company!
Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:22 pm
promiseland wrote:Doc this is one Kick-Ass Topic!!
Although I had nothing to contribute, I thoroughly enjoyed reading every post , These type quality topics is what makes FECC so much fun and at the same time very imformative reading.
Hope to have even more of these from the masterminds
DJC and Company!

This has been a fascinating, informative read! Thanks, promiseland, for reviving it for those of us who weren't here to catch it the first time. The intricacies of the Christmas product, especially, but not limited to the first album, are quite complex. Thanks, Doc, for making it clearer!
rjm
P.S. -- Around a year ago, I was still messing with VERY old threads, and missed the then-still-current ones such as this. Well, it had additions, and I missed it then. I was still in awe of it all!
Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:01 am
I just found an interesting, double-page, late October 1957 RCA ad in
Billboard. which includes a plug for both the Christmas EP and LP:
Billboard Oct 28 1957 Audition 2-3.JPG
Billboard - October 28, 1957Full scan of two-page advertisementInterestingly, a mockup involving the David B. Hecht cover shot for the second LP in 1956 is used:
Billboard Oct 28 1957 Audition 3_DETAIL.JPG
Billboard - October 28, 1957Detail of Presley albumOne might think RCA's ad department might have the cover art ready, but it seems this was not the case. The ad does serve to show the album was due out in November, not October.
Merry Christmas, everybody!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.