Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:33 pm
Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:52 pm
DarrylMac wrote:May I ask who told you that it was Detroit? Now you are right that some of the See See Rider is from Detroit. It is a mixture of San Antonio and Detroit. You got that right but the other is wrong.
Theres a part of that footage that you posted showing Elvis in sunglasses backstage - that's Detroit. Actually, having reviewed the photo's, I believe the main body of footage you've shown could be Macon Georgia. It comes down to Elvis hair. It could be Macon, which is the day after Greensboro, and they could well be discussing the night before.
The reason I'm adamant it's not San Antonio is Elvis hair is completely different.
Here, in Macon, his hair is coming down over his face a little, in the same way it is during the backstage footage.
Whereas in San Antonio, he almost has a side part, with no hair coming down over his face.
Wherever that red room footage may be, it's 100% not San Antonio, as right up until he goes on stage, he has hair down over his face from the right side, which then changes completely as he enters the stage as shown in EOT.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:10 am
The Red Room is from San Antonio just because of what Elvis is saying.
You can't deny the facts presented before you just because you going by hair alone.
Well, I can tell you right now. It is not Macon Georgia. How do I know? Because I only live 15 miles from the Macon Coliseum.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:28 am
DarrylMac wrote:The Red Room is from San Antonio just because of what Elvis is saying.
We'll have to agree to disagree. Elvis at no point says "we're going to do Burning Love today." He only discusses the fact they'd goofed on it previously, which does indeed date it after Greensboro, when someone asks if he's going to do it.You can't deny the facts presented before you just because you going by hair alone.
I have a keen eye for details, and I can tell you, and have presented photgraphic evidence to show that Elvis appearance in the backstage footage is totally different to how he appeared on stage that night in San Antonio. The camera doesn't lie. We follow Elvis right up untll he goes on stage, and he has hair down over his eye. We see in the movie his entrance in San Antonio, and he looks totally different.Well, I can tell you right now. It is not Macon Georgia. How do I know? Because I only live 15 miles from the Macon Coliseum.
I live 15 miles from Manchester, but it doesn't mean I know what colour the dressing room is at the MEN Arena. How can you say for sure that there was never a red room in 1972?
That backstage footage isn't from San Antonio.

Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:34 am
Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:46 am
DarrylMac wrote:As I said, there is such a difference in Elvis' appearance, there's no way that backstage footage is from San Antonio. We're going to have to agree to disagree.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:58 am
elvislennon wrote:
How do I know? I done more research on the Macon Coliseum that you have ever done. I talked to the ones who worked there and works there now. I have been working with the people at the Macon Coliseum on a Elvis tribute for that place.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:00 am
The workers told me that the walls has always been the same color is 1968 when it first open, they have always been white.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:23 am
elvislennon wrote:DarrylMac wrote:The Red Room is from San Antonio just because of what Elvis is saying.
We'll have to agree to disagree. Elvis at no point says "we're going to do Burning Love today." He only discusses the fact they'd goofed on it previously, which does indeed date it after Greensboro, when someone asks if he's going to do it.You can't deny the facts presented before you just because you going by hair alone.
I have a keen eye for details, and I can tell you, and have presented photgraphic evidence to show that Elvis appearance in the backstage footage is totally different to how he appeared on stage that night in San Antonio. The camera doesn't lie. We follow Elvis right up untll he goes on stage, and he has hair down over his eye. We see in the movie his entrance in San Antonio, and he looks totally different.Well, I can tell you right now. It is not Macon Georgia. How do I know? Because I only live 15 miles from the Macon Coliseum.
I live 15 miles from Manchester, but it doesn't mean I know what colour the dressing room is at the MEN Arena. How can you say for sure that there was never a red room in 1972?
That backstage footage isn't from San Antonio.
How do I know? I done more research on the Macon Coliseum that you have ever done.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:33 am
DarrylMac wrote:The workers told me that the walls has always been the same color is 1968 when it first open, they have always been white.
Here's a pic of someone backstage at the Macon Coliesum, taken from this website.
http://www.gainformer.com/Files/Bow%20Wow%20Concert.htm
Look familiar?
The red wall in the Elvis footage was only one wall - identical to this photo.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:35 am
ben wrote:elvislennon wrote:DarrylMac wrote:The Red Room is from San Antonio just because of what Elvis is saying.
We'll have to agree to disagree. Elvis at no point says "we're going to do Burning Love today." He only discusses the fact they'd goofed on it previously, which does indeed date it after Greensboro, when someone asks if he's going to do it.You can't deny the facts presented before you just because you going by hair alone.
I have a keen eye for details, and I can tell you, and have presented photgraphic evidence to show that Elvis appearance in the backstage footage is totally different to how he appeared on stage that night in San Antonio. The camera doesn't lie. We follow Elvis right up untll he goes on stage, and he has hair down over his eye. We see in the movie his entrance in San Antonio, and he looks totally different.Well, I can tell you right now. It is not Macon Georgia. How do I know? Because I only live 15 miles from the Macon Coliseum.
I live 15 miles from Manchester, but it doesn't mean I know what colour the dressing room is at the MEN Arena. How can you say for sure that there was never a red room in 1972?
That backstage footage isn't from San Antonio.
How do I know? I done more research on the Macon Coliseum that you have ever done.
oh your too modest![]()
i hope this was completely filmed, i would love footage from ANY show released complete
Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:41 am
Little Darlin wrote:elvislennon wrote:
How do I know? I done more research on the Macon Coliseum that you have ever done. I talked to the ones who worked there and works there now. I have been working with the people at the Macon Coliseum on a Elvis tribute for that place.
Are they erecting a Statue by any chance?
Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:43 am
elvislennon wrote:The two shows was not completely filmed. I would say about 25% of both shows was filmed.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:47 am
drjohncarpenter wrote:elvislennon wrote:The two shows was not completely filmed. I would say about 25% of both shows was filmed.
Unless you worked on the documentary, please tell us how you know this.
Otherwise, the first wish here is that Buffalo sees the light of day -- none of us is getting any younger.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:46 am
Thu Mar 13, 2008 3:39 pm
elvislennon wrote:I am going by what the owner said. That is what he remembers they filmed of it. They was having trouble filming at the Coliseum for some reason.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 3:55 pm
Kris P wrote:epf wrote: IIRC there was a thread not too long ago (just the other week) which more or less delt with the camera in question. Somebody posted a picture of the camera that was used for this show and it clearly showed a not to be missed a (semi?) attached microphone, so one would think there would be sound, even if it was in a somewhat lesser quality.
Here's the pics I posted epf, though not the actual camera and portapack used by Abel, this setup is indicative of the time.
As well as recording the majority of the Buffalo concert, it was Abel who also used his video camera to tape the Buffalo rehearsal.
As for audio of the concert it is likely that RCA only booked Record Plant to record Hampton, Richmond, Greensboro and San Antonio (recorded by the Wally Heider Company), therefore the only audio in existence would be that of the Abel videotape or soundboard.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:07 pm
Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:49 pm
Scott wrote:A question ...
(lights small bomb, throws, moves away ...)
Forget the hairstyle.
How do we know - for a fact, mind you - that the Red Lion footage from On Tour is from Detroit and not San Antone?
I will explain why I'm asking this question later ...
Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:51 pm
Renan wrote:elvislennon wrote:I am going by what the owner said. That is what he remembers they filmed of it. They was having trouble filming at the Coliseum for some reason.
Maybe the owner does not have all the tapes containing the Jacksonville concerts.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:52 pm
elvislennon wrote:If you are talking about the concert footage itself, then why is the band outfits changing colors from dark blue to white every little bit.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:55 pm
Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:58 pm
Scott wrote:elvislennon wrote:If you are talking about the concert footage itself, then why is the band outfits changing colors from dark blue to white every little bit.
Yes, I am talking about the concert footage only. Not backstage, not the entrance on the outtakes where the other outfits change.
My question again: how do we know it's from Detroit?
Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:00 pm
DarrylMac wrote:Scott - in the outtake concert footage, the band are in blue, which they were in Detroit, whereas they weren't in blue in San Antonio, and they I'm not sure what colour they wore in Macon.
Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:02 pm
elvislennon wrote: Because of the band members wearing the outfits.
Hosted by ElviCities