frankly I really don't get the meaning of this post
this picture was taken against elvis will probably
it is easiest for a big fat moron to "imitate" the 77 elvis than the 68/69 one
did elvis looks pretty bad wearing his stage outfit in his car ?
YES HE DID
so what ?
if this is CALLED ECCENTRIC BEHAVIOUR ? YOU WILL BE ASTONISHED
BY WHAT ELVIS REALLY DID IN MANY OTHERS SITUATIONS
as any rock star living in a golden cage he had a way of life and a behaviour without any connection to reality or normality
we cannot compare it to the way of life of any of us
this is pure fact it is logical and it don't disturb me
just a thought ( may be of topic )
why elvis is always showed ( officialy ) in his "working outfit" in the seventies ?
we all know that even for releasing a pure studio album they used a "on stage picture" ( and always the ugliest one !! )
INSTEAD OF THESE BAD PICTURES RCA should have hired a real
good photographer and present him working in the studio or at home
beautiful coverdesign didn't fit with elvis release policy whe he was alive !
shure there was some nice one but how many were confusing people
or without any appeal
there was no difference in a picwick camden budget price compilation
( filed with movie rejects ) and a brand new album
there was no difference beetween a live and a studio album ( same sort of cover art )
this had contributed to elvis decreasing poupularity
more than a ugly polaroid picture taken by a fan
luckily the coverart is way better now !!!!!